Legal Research
Cases
Aurisch v Wilson

Aurisch v Wilson

Case [2022] VCC 720

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Aurisch v Wilson [2022] VCC 720
Case: [2022] VCC 720
Decision Date: 13 May 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Aurisch v Wilson [2022] VCC 720

Most Recent Citation

Kirali v Matthews (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 218

Cases Citing This Decision

Kirali v Matthews (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 218
Citation 1 (Para 24)

…in a defamation action where the imputations pleaded (namely conducting a “puppy farm”) were very similar to those here: Aurisch & Anor v Wilson [2022] VCC 720.…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 750
Citation 1

…John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1981] 2 NSWLR 474; Cables v Winchester [2018] VSC 392; Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd & Slee (1993) 178 CLR 44; Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (2015) 237 FCR 33; Roberts v Bass (2002) 212 CLR 1; Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2003) 216 CLR 327; Triggell v Pheeney (1951) 82 CLR 497 Judgment: For the plaint…
Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 52
Citation 2

…airfax & Sons Ltd & Slee (1993) 178 CLR 44; Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (2015) 237 FCR 33; Roberts v Bass (2002) 212 CLR 1; Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2003) 216 CLR 327; Triggell v Pheeney (1951) 82 CLR 497 Judgment: For the plaintiffs against the defendant for damages in the sum of $115,000 including aggravated da…
Roberts v Bass [2002] HCA 57
Citation 3 (Para 30)

…r some purpose or motive foreign to the duty or interest that protects the making of the statement.”[24] (Footnotes omitted.) [24] Roberts v Bass (2002) 212 CLR 1 at paragraph [62][…
Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1993] HCA 31
Citation 4 (Para 6)

…defamed person for damage to his or her reputation; and (c) to vindicate that person’s reputation.[27] [27] Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd & Slee (1993) 178 CLR 44 at [32].…
Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Uren [1966] HCA 37
Citation 5 (Para 32)

…vation caused by it.[32] [32] Defamation Law in Australia – P. George 3 rd Ed . at [34.2]; Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Uren (1965-1966) 117 CLR 185, at 205.…
Triggell v Pheeney [1951] HCA 23
Citation 6 (Para 31)

…e conduct is improper, unjustifiable, or lacking in bona fides.[30] Malice on the part of the defendant is not necessary.[31] [30] Triggell v Pheeney (1951) 82 CLR 497, at 514. [31] Bickel v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1981] 2 NSWLR 474 at 497…
Cables v Winchester [2018] VSC 392
Citation 7 (Para 48)

…2022 at the rate of 3% per annum. I note that this was the rate at which interest was to be calculated in the matter of Cables v Winchester.[34] [34] [2018] VSC 392 Costs…

AI Chat coming soon