Atkinson v Gameco (NSW) Pty Ltd

Case [2005] NSWCA 338


CITATION:

Atkinson v Gameco (NSW) Pty Limited [2005] NSWCA 338

HEARING DATE(S):

30/09/05

 
JUDGMENT DATE: 


10 October 2005

JUDGMENT OF:

Giles JA at 1; Ipp JA at 2; Hunt AJA at 36

DECISION:

Appeal dismissed with costs.

CATCHWORDS:

NEGLIGENCE - employee - non-delegable duty of care - injury occurring on premises of third party in Thailand - casual act of negligence - training in safety and risk assessment - causation. D

CASES CITED:

Andar Transport Pty Ltd v Brambles Ltd (2004) 317 CLR 424
Bourke v Victorian Work Cover Authority [1999] 1 VR 189
English v Wilsons and Clyde Coal Co Ltd (1936) SC 883
Kondis v State Transport Authority (1984) 154 CLR 672
Sinclair v William Arnott Pty Ltd (No 2) (1963) 64 SR (NSW) 88
Smith v Austin Lifts Limited [1959] 1 WLR 100
Taylor v Sims & Sims [1942] 2 All ER 375
TNT Australia Pty Limited v Christie [2003] NSWCA 47
Wilson v Tyneside Window Cleaning Company [1958] 2 QB 110

PARTIES:

Anthony Atkinson (Appellant)
Gameco (NSW) Pty Limited (Respondent)

FILE NUMBER(S):

CA 40942/04

COUNSEL:

M R Aldridge SC/E E Welsh (Appellant)
J McIntyre SC/A Capelin (Respondent)

SOLICITORS:

Maxwell Berghouse & Ives (Appellant)
Moray & Agnew (Respondent)

LOWER COURT JURISDICTION:

District Court

LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S):

4297/02

LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER:

Bishop DCJ



                          CA 40942/04
                          DC 4297/02

                          GILES JA
                          IPP JA
                          HUNT AJA

                          Monday 10 October 2005
ANTHONY ATKINSON v GAMECO (NSW) PTY LIMITED
Judgment

1 GILES JA: I agree with Ipp JA.

2 IPP JA: Mr Atkinson, the appellant, was employed as the marketing manager of Gameco (NSW) Pty Ltd, the respondent. Gameco manufactured gas burners. Mr Atkinson had considerable experience in the design, assembly and sale of gas burners.

3 In August 1997 Mr Atkinson travelled to Thailand in an attempt to interest a Thai company in purchasing Gameco’s gas burners. The Thai company was a potential customer as it manufactured bitumen tanker vehicles that utilised wood burners and Gameco hoped that it might be persuaded to install the Gameco product instead. The burners were used to heat the bitumen in the tankers and thereby to keep it in liquid form.

4 While at the premises of the Thai company, Mr Atkinson decided that he would be assisted by an inspection of the burner tubes in its tankers. The only way in which he could do this was to climb to the top of the cylindrical tank of a tanker and to open a hatch situated there. He would then be able to look down and observe the burner tubes.

5 At the time Mr Atkinson was being shown around by Mr Saunders, a senior employee (an Australian) of the Thai company. Mr Atkinson asked Mr Saunders if he could climb on to a tanker so that he could look at the burner tubes. Mr Saunders pointed to a tanker, one of several on the factory floor, and said, “You can have a look on that one”.

6 A ladder was attached to the…

Continue reading Atkinson v Gameco (NSW) Pty Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Atkinson v Gameco (NSW) Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 338
Case
[2005] NSWCA 338
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Atkinson, brought proceedings against the respondent, Gameco (NSW) Pty Ltd, alleging negligence. The dispute concerned an injury sustained by Atkinson while working on premises in Thailand owned by a third party. The case was heard in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether Gameco owed Atkinson a non-delegable duty of care in relation to the injury sustained on the third-party premises, and if so, whether Gameco had breached that duty. The court also considered the question of causation, specifically whether any breach by Gameco had caused Atkinson's injury, and whether the injury was the result of a casual act of negligence.

The Court of Appeal affirmed that an employer owes a non-delegable duty to its employees to take reasonable care for their safety. This duty extends to ensuring that work is carried out in a safe system and that employees are adequately trained in safety and risk assessment. The court found that Gameco had failed to provide adequate training to Atkinson regarding the risks associated with the work being undertaken on the third-party premises. Despite the injury occurring on premises not controlled by Gameco, the court held that Gameco's failure to adequately train Atkinson in safety and risk assessment was a breach of its non-delegable duty. The court was satisfied that this breach caused Atkinson's injury.

The appeal was dismissed, and Gameco was awarded its costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.