AARONISLE PTY LTD -v- THORPE & ANOR [2005] WASC 87
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2005] WASC 87 | |
| Case No: | CIV:1388/2005 | 18 & 22 APRIL 2005 | |
| Coram: | COMMISSIONER MCKERRACHER QC | 20/05/05 | |
| 18 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Application dismissed | ||
| B | |||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | AARONISLE PTY LTD ANDREW CECIL THORPE REGISTRAR OF TITLES |
Catchwords: | Mandatory injunction Removal of caveat Summary accounting Fiduciary duty of legal practitioner in securing past and future fees Undertakings to remove caveats to accommodate settlements |
Legislation: | Legal Practice Act 2003, s 225, s 231(3), (4) Legal Practitioners Act 1893, s 62 Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA), O 45 r 2 Transfer of Land Act 1893 |
Case References: | Air Express Ltd v Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd (1981) 146 CLR 249 American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396 Bullock v Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (No 1) (1985) 5 FCR 464 Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148 Cayne v Global Natural Resources Plc [1984] 1 All ER 225 Evans Marshall & Co Ltd v Bertola SA [1973] 1 All ER 992; [1973] 1 WLR 349 Holborow v Macdonald Rudder (A Firm) [2001] WASCA 91 Pindan Pty Ltd v Sunny's Redevelopment & Ors [2001] WASC 104 Re Nelson and the Legal Practitioner's Act (1970) 106 ACTR 1; 105 FLR 137 Re Peggoty, unreported; SCt of Qld (Derrington J); Library No 256 of 1981; 5 April 1991 State of Queensland v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1985) 59 ALR 243 State Transport Authority v Apex Quarries Ltd [1988] VR 187 Westminster Brymbo Coal & Coke Co v Clapton (1867) 36 LJ Ch 476 Woodward v Page, unreported; Eq Div SCt of NSW (McLelland J); Library No 3329 of 1989; 20 July 1989 Kirschbaum v "Our Voices" Publishing Company & Ors [1972] 1 OR 737 Macedonian Society of Western Australia (Inc) (Receiver and Manager appointed) v St George Bank Ltd [2003] WASC 17 Re Gyhon; Allen v Taylor (1885) 29 Ch 834 |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
- IN CHAMBERS
- Plaintiff
AND
ANDREW CECIL THORPE
First Defendant
REGISTRAR OF TITLES
Second Defendant
Catchwords:
Mandatory injunction - Removal of caveat - Summary accounting - Fiduciary duty of legal practitioner in securing past and future fees - Undertakings to remove caveats to accommodate settlements
Legislation:
Legal Practice Act 2003, s 225, s 231(3), (4)
Legal Practitioners Act 1893, s 62
Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA), O 45 r 2
Transfer of Land Act 1893
(Page 2)
Result:
Application dismissed
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
Plaintiff : Mr J R Birman
First Defendant : In person (18 April 2005)
Mr J Gilmour QC (22 April 2005)
Second Defendant : No…
Continue reading Aaronisle Pty Ltd v Thorpe
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
- AGLC
- Aaronisle Pty Ltd v Thorpe [2005] WASC 87
- Case
- [2005] WASC 87
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Aaronisle Pty Ltd applied for urgent injunctive relief against Andrew Cecil Thorpe, a solicitor, and the Registrar of Titles. The plaintiff claimed that Thorpe, in breach of his fiduciary duties, had failed to advise the plaintiff about a charge executed to secure payment of professional fees. The plaintiff also sought an order for Thorpe to account for all monies he had received and paid on the plaintiff's behalf, both for professional services and commercial activities. The court was required to decide whether the plaintiff's claim was serious enough to warrant interlocutory injunctive relief and whether damages would be an adequate remedy. The court found that the plaintiff had not demonstrated a high probability of success on the claim that Thorpe had breached his fiduciary duties regarding the charge. Additionally, the court found that there was a real dispute regarding whether Thorpe had already accounted for the Maylands project and legal fees, making a summary accounting inappropriate. The court also concluded that the balance of convenience did not favour granting the injunctive relief sought by the plaintiff. The application for injunctive relief was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.