Wolverhampton City Council and others (Respondents) v London Gypsies and Travellers and others (Appellants)
[2023] UKSC 47
Citation 1
…ken to balance her particular human rights against the grant of an injunction against her, in accordance with South Bucks District Council v Porter [2003] UKHL 26; [2003] 2 AC 558.…
London Borough of Harrow v. Qazi
[2003] UKHL 43
Citation 2
…Strasbourg jurisprudence and, in my opinion, gives effect to the purpose of the Convention. I agree with it. In South Bucks District Council v Porter [2003] UKHL 26, [2003] 2 WLR 1547 paragraph 37, I wished to leave open the question whether "any action by a public authority seeking possession of residential prop…
Secretary of State for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs v Meier & Ors
[2009] UKSC 11
Citation 3
…m have young children, so imprisonment may very well be disproportionate. In South Bucks District Council v Porter [2003] UKHL 26, [2003] 2 AC 558, local planning authorities were seeking injunctions to restrain gypsies from remaining on land in breach of planning law, and at para 32, Lord Bingham of Cornhill sai…
Wolverhampton City Council & Ors v London Gypsies and Travellers & Ors
[2023] UKSC 47
Citation 4
…k LJJ agreed, stated that each of the appellants became a party to the proceedings when she did an act which brought her within the definition of defendant in the particular case. Ms Gammell had therefore already become a defendant when she stationed her caravan on the site. Her proper course (and that of any new…