Rhone v Stephens

Case [1994] UKHL 3


    Parliamentary Archives,
    HL/PO/JU/18/254

    Rhone (A.P.) and another (A.P.) (Appellants)

    v.
    Stephens (Executrix of Mrs M. Barnard, deceased) (Respondent)


    JUDGMENT

    Die Jovis 17° Martii 1994

    Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to whom was
    referred the Cause Rhone and another against Stephens (Executrix
    of Mrs M. Barnard, deceased) , That the Committee had heard
    Counsel as well on Monday the 7th as on Tuesday the 8th days of
    February last upon the Petition and Appeal of Ronald John Rhone
    and Hazel Grace Rhone of 1 Harbour View, Combwich, Bridgwater,
    Somerset, praying that the matter of the Order set forth in the
    Schedule thereto, namely an Order of Her Majesty's Court of
    Appeal of the 15th day of January 1993, so far as stated therein
    to be appealed against, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the
    Queen in Her Court of Parliament and that the said Order so far
    as aforesaid might be reversed, varied or altered or that the
    Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to
    Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament might seem meet;
    as upon the case of Jean Stephens (Executrix of Mrs M. Barnard,
    deceased) lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and due
    consideration had this day of what was offered on either side in
    this Cause:

    It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and
    Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen
    assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal
    of the 15th day of January 1993 complained of in the said Appeal
    be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed and that the said Petition
    and Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House: And
    it is further Ordered. That the Costs incurred by the Respondent
    in this House and in the Court of Appeal be paid out of the Legal
    Aid Fund in accordance with section 18 of the Legal Aid Act 1988,
    such order to be suspended for four weeks to allow the Legal Aid
    Board to object if they wish: And it is also further Ordered.
    That the Costs incurred by the Appellants in respect of the said
    Appeal be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Act 1988.

    Cler: Parliamentor:

    Judgment: 17 March 1994

    HOUSE OF LORDS

    RHONE (A.P.) AND ANOTHER (A.P.)
    (APPELLANTS)

    v.

    STEPHENS (EXECUTRIX OF MRS. M. BARNARD, DECEASED)

    (RESPONDENT)

    Lord Templeman
    Lord Oliver
    of Aylmerton
    Lord Woolf
    Lord Lloyd
    Lord Nolan


    LORD TEMPLEMAN

    My Lords,

    This appeal raises the question of the enforceability of positive
    covenants between owners of freehold estates and involves consideration of the
    rule in Austerberry v. Oldham Corporation (1885) 29 Ch. D. 750 ("the
    Austerberry Case").

    The roof which covers Walford House also covers part of Walford
    Cottage. Both properties were in common ownership until by a conveyance
    dated 27 August 1960 Walford Cottage was sold. The conveyance contained
    the following provisions:

    "2 It is hereby agreed and declared between the Vendor and the
    Purchasers that all easements…

Continue reading Rhone v Stephens

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
Case
[1994] UKHL 3
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.