Parliamentary
Archives,
HL/PO/JU/18/254
Rhone (A.P.) and another (A.P.) (Appellants)
v.
Stephens
(Executrix of Mrs M. Barnard, deceased) (Respondent)
JUDGMENT
Die Jovis 17° Martii 1994
Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to
whom was
referred the Cause Rhone and another against Stephens
(Executrix
of Mrs M. Barnard, deceased) , That the Committee had
heard
Counsel as well on Monday the 7th as on Tuesday the 8th days
of
February last upon the Petition and Appeal of Ronald John
Rhone
and Hazel Grace Rhone of 1 Harbour View, Combwich,
Bridgwater,
Somerset, praying that the matter of the Order set
forth in the
Schedule thereto, namely an Order of Her Majesty's
Court of
Appeal of the 15th day of January 1993, so far as stated
therein
to be appealed against, might be reviewed before Her
Majesty the
Queen in Her Court of Parliament and that the said
Order so far
as aforesaid might be reversed, varied or altered or
that the
Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises
as to
Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament might seem
meet;
as upon the case of Jean Stephens (Executrix of Mrs M.
Barnard,
deceased) lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and
due
consideration had this day of what was offered on either side
in
this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by
the Lords Spiritual and
Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her
Majesty the Queen
assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's
Court of Appeal
of the 15th day of January 1993 complained of in
the said Appeal
be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed and
that the said Petition
and Appeal be, and the same is hereby,
dismissed this House: And
it is further Ordered. That the
Costs incurred by the Respondent
in this House and in the Court of
Appeal be paid out of the Legal
Aid Fund in accordance with
section 18 of the Legal Aid Act 1988,
such order to be suspended
for four weeks to allow the Legal Aid
Board to object if they
wish: And it is also further Ordered.
That the Costs
incurred by the Appellants in respect of the said
Appeal be taxed
in accordance with the Legal Aid Act 1988.
Cler: Parliamentor:
Judgment: 17 March 1994
HOUSE OF LORDS
RHONE
(A.P.) AND ANOTHER (A.P.)
(APPELLANTS)
v.
STEPHENS (EXECUTRIX OF MRS. M. BARNARD, DECEASED)
(RESPONDENT)
Lord
Templeman
Lord Oliver of
Aylmerton
Lord Woolf
Lord Lloyd
Lord Nolan
LORD TEMPLEMAN
My Lords,
This appeal
raises the question of the enforceability of positive
covenants
between owners of freehold estates and involves consideration of
the
rule in Austerberry v. Oldham Corporation (1885) 29 Ch.
D. 750 ("the
Austerberry Case").
The roof which
covers Walford House also covers part of Walford
Cottage. Both
properties were in common ownership until by a conveyance
dated 27
August 1960 Walford Cottage was sold. The conveyance contained
the
following provisions:
"2 It is
hereby agreed and declared between the Vendor and the
Purchasers
that all easements…
Continue reading Rhone v Stephens
Sign in free to access the full text
- Case
- [1994] UKHL 3
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.