Biondi & Koen
[2021] FamCA 230
Citation 1
(Para 11)
…e of H&T (Judicial Change of Mind) [2018] EWHC 3692 (Fam), at [79-80] and the decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in Re L and B (Children) [2013] UKSC 8. In H & T , Justice Macdonald observed [79-80]: As I have noted, in the original draft of this judgment circulated to the parties I concluded that the…
Department of Communities and Justice & Mangal
[2021] FamCA 118
Citation 2
…6] UKSC 4 Re C and another (Children) International Centre for Family Law, Policy and Practice intervening) [2018] UKSC 8 Re L and B (Children) [2013] UKSC 8 Re S (A Minor) (Custody: Habitual Residence) [1998] AC 750 Re S (Minors) (Abduction: Wrongful Retention) [1994] 1 FLR 82 State Central Authority & Handbury…
PERICLES & HOPMAN
[2021] FamCA 235
Citation 3
(Para 2)
…. [93] For a discussion of this process, see of H&T [2018] EWHC 3692 (Fam), at [79-80] and the decision of the Supreme Court in Re L and B (Children) [2013] UKSC 8. [94] Exhibit “W14” correspondence dated 21 April 2021 at 4.18pm.…
AIC Ltd (Respondent) v Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (Appellant)
[2022] UKSC 16
Citation 4
…In In re L (Children) (Preliminary Finding: Power to Reverse) [2013] UKSC 8; [2013] 1 WLR 634 (“ Re L ”), at para 27, Baroness Hale of Richmond (with whom the other members of the court agreed) said that the judge should seek to resolve the problem by doing justice in accordance with the overriding objective. Re…
Sharland (Appellant) v Sharland (Respondent)
[2015] UKSC 60
Citation 5
…be brought does not arise. The trial judge was able to revisit his order: see In re L and another (Children) (Preliminary Finding: Power to Reverse) [2013] UKSC 8; [2013] 1 WLR 634. This and other procedural issues do, however, arise in the case of Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61, which was heard at the same time…
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd v Laszczuk
[2018] VSC 388
Citation 6
(Para 1)
…se their decision after it had been perfected, either specifically in family and children proceedings or more generally.[99] [98][2013] 2 All ER 294; [2013] UKSC 8. [99]See Re L and B (Children) (care proceedings: power to revise judgment) [2013] 2 All ER 294, [32]–[45].…
Wollondilly Shire Council v Foxman Environmental Development Services Pty Ltd (No 8)
[2013] NSWLEC 168
Citation 7
(Para 1)
…cial functions in the community, less than exceptional circumstances" may be required to permit reopening (citing In the matter of L and B (Children) [2013] UKSC 8; [2013] 1 WLR 634 at [41] as authority for this proposition).…
AIC Ltd v Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria
[2022] UKSC 16
Citation 8
…ce with what principles, should the judge decide whether or not to exercise that power? In In re L (Children) (Preliminary Finding: Power to Reverse) [2013] UKSC 8; [2013] 1 WLR 634 (“ Re L ”), at para 27, Baroness Hale of Richmond (with whom the other members of the court agreed) said that the judge should seek…
Sharland v Sharland
[2015] UKSC 60
Citation 9
…trial judge was able to revisit his order: see In re L and another (Children) (Preliminary Finding: Power to Reverse) [2013] UKSC 8; [2013] 1 WLR 634. This and other procedural issues do, however, arise in the case of Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61, which was heard at the same time as this case. In L v L [2006] E…
Singh-Weekes v South-West Regional Health Regional Health Authority
[2025] UKPC 10
Citation 10
…n motion, recall and change an order made by him or her before it is perfected." For the equivalent rule in English law see In re L and B (Children) [2013] UKSC 8, Lady Hale at paras 16-19. Further, the Court of Appeal was incorrect in its interpretation of rule 67.13. In the Board's view the word "awarded" in c…