Legal Research
Cases
Milson v Carter (New South Wales)

Milson v Carter (New South Wales)

Case [1893] UKPC 47

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is coming soon as we're improving how the document is presented.

Details

Case: [1893] UKPC 47
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Most Recent Citation

Director-General Department of Land and Water Conservation v Pye (No 2) [1999] NSWLEC 45

Cases Citing This Decision

17

Hrycenko (by His Legal Representative Hycenko) v Hrycenko [2022] FedCFamC2G 2
Citation 1 (Para 26)

…This rule, like similar rules in other Courts, is commonly referred to as the slip rule. In L Shaddock and Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 2) (1982) 151 CLR 590 the High Court was concerned with a case in which through the inadvertence of Counsel, both before the appeal court in New…
Krimbogiannis v Fallshaw (Investments) Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATCD 49
Citation 2

…‘Order 29, r. 11 is in the traditional form of a slip rule. It reflects the inherent jurisdiction of a court "at any time to correct an error in a decree or order arising from a slip or accidental omission" (see Milson v. Carter (1893) AC 638 , at p 640). In terms, the rule provides, inter alia, tha…
Simmons v Love [2015] WASC 79 (S2)
Citation 3

…an error in a decree or order arising from a slip or accidental omission', regardless of whether the order has been drawn up, passed and entered: see Milson v Carter (1893) AC 638 at 640. It applies where the mistake or error is the result of inadvertence by a party's legal representative: L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd…
Koushappis v The State of Western Australia [No 2] [2015] WASC 211
Citation 4

…an error in a decree or order arising from a slip or accidental omission', regardless of whether the order has been drawn up, passed and entered: see Milson v Carter (1893) AC 638, 640. It applies where the mistake or error is the result of inadvertence by a party's legal representative: L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v…
Orchard Holdings Pty Ltd v Paxhill Pty Ltd as trustee for Paxhill Trust trading as Property People [2012] WASC 271 (S2)
Citation 5

…LFOT Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 180; (2004) 136 FCR 566 L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 2) [1982] HCA 59; (1982) 151 CLR 590 Milson v Carter (1893) AC 638 Orchard Holdings Pty Ltd v Paxhill Pty Ltd [2012] WASC 271 Storey & Keers Pty Ltd v Johnstone (1987) 9 NSWLR 446…
Orchard Holdings Pty Ltd v Paxhill Pty Ltd as Trustee for Paxhill Trust trading as Property People [2012] WASC 271
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…an error in a decree or order arising from a slip or accidental omission', regardless of whether the order has been drawn up, passed and entered: see Milson v Carter (1893) AC 638, 640.…
R v Green and Quinn [2011] NSWCCA 71
Citation 7 (Para 1)

…or omissions in order to ensure that orders finally made reflect the intention of the Court. That authority includes In re Swire (1885) 30 Ch D 239; Milson v Carter (1893) AC 638; R v Michael (1976) QB 414; L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council [No 2] [1982] HCA 59; 151 CLR 590 at 594-595; De Zylva (…
Kane Stephen Davis v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2011] NSWSC 153
Citation 8

…omission ( Storey & Keers Pty Ltd v Johnstone (1987) 9 NSWLR 446 at 449 per McHugh JA; Ex parte Hassell; Re Quirk (1937) 37 SR (NSW) 192 at 198-9 and Milson v Carter (1893) AC 638 at 640).…
Barclay & Orton [2009] FamCAFC 159
Citation 9 (Para 3)

…The principles related to the slip rule are well settled law. In Bailey and Bailey (1990) FLC 92-145, Mullane J stated at 78,009: Superior courts do have inherent power to amend orders to give effect to the meaning of the judgment and intention of the court (e.g. see Ex parte Herman; re Mathieson (N…
Boral Resources (Qld) Pty Ltd v Griffiths (No.2) [2005] FMCA 1340
Citation 10 (Para 7)

…t. A Court has an inherent jurisdiction “ at any time to correct an error in the decree or order arising from a slip or accidental omission” (see Milson v Carter (1893) A.C. 638 at page 640; El Shaddock and Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No. 2) (1982) 151 CLR 590 at 594). I am satisfied this principle appl…
Noetel & Quealey [2005] FamCA 677
Citation 11 (Para 3)

…), vol 2, Pt 2, pp 1547-1548; Lawrie v Lees [1881] 7 AC 19 ; In re Swire Mellor v Swire (1885) 30 ChD 239 ; Hatton v Harris (1892) AC 547 ; Milson v Carter (1893) AC 638 ; MacCarthy v Agard (1933) 2 KB 417 ; and Gikas v Papanayiotou (1977) 2 NSWLR 944 , his Honour continued: ‘The slip rule applies where the proposed amen…
Sakr v Mercantile Mutual Insurance [2000] NSWCA 266
Citation 12

…onwealth v McCormack (1984) 155 CLR 273 Barrell Insurances Pty Ltd v Pennant Hills Restaurant Pty Ltd (1983) 49 ALR 384 Hatton v Harris (1892) AC 547 Carter v Milson (1893) 10 WN (NSW) 9 Gould v Vaggelas (1983-85) 157 CLR 215 DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.…
Russell & Russell [1999] FamCA 1875
Citation 13 (Para 2)

…pp 1547-8; William Lawrie v George Lees [1881] 7 AC 19; Re Swire. Mellor v Swire (1885) 30 ChD 239; Henry William Hatton v Hugh Harris (1892) AC 547; Milson v Carter (1893) AC 638; MacCarthy v Agard (1933) 2 KB 417; and Gikas v Papanayiotou (1977) 2 NSWLR 944, his Honour continued: "The slip rule applies where the propos…
L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 2) [1982] HCA 59
Citation 14

…6. Order 29, r. 11 is in the traditional form of a slip rule. It reflects the inherent jurisdiction of a court "at any time to correct an error in a decree or order arising from a slip or accidental omission" (see Milson v. Carter (1893) AC 638, at p 640 ). In terms, the rule provides, inter alia, t…
Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Goldfinger Bullion Reserve Corporation [No 2] [2013] WASC 16
Citation 15

…Victoria Legal Aid [2005] HCA 12; (2005) 223 CLR 1 L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 2) [1982] HCA 59; (1982) 151 CLR 590 Milson v Carter (1893) AC 638 Storey & Keers Pty Ltd v Johnstone (1987) 9 NSWLR 446…
Westsub Discounts Pty Ltd v Idaps Australia Ltd (No 2) [1990] FCA 188
Citation 16

…rect an error in an order arising from a slip or accidental omission, whether or not that power is conferred expressly on the court by the slip rule (Milson v Carter (1893) AC 638). The power is vested in a court in virtue of its inherent jurisdiction and it seems that this power is no less extensive than the power confe…
Director-General Department of Land & Water Conservation - v - Pye (No 2) [1999] NSWLEC 45
Citation 17

…court ‘at any time to correct an error in a decree or order arising from a slip or accidental omission’ (see Milson v Carter (1893) AC 628 at p 640). In terms, the rule provides, inter alia, that ‘an error arising in a judgment or order from an accidental slip or omission, may at any time be corrected by the Court or a…

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0

AI Chat coming soon