Parliamentary
Archives,
HL/PO/JU/18/254
Hunt (now Severs) (A.P.) (Respondent)
v.
Severs
(Appellant)
JUDGMENT
Die Jovis 28° Aprilis 1994
Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to
whom was
referred the Cause Hunt (now Severs) against Severs, That
the
Committee had heard Counsel as well on Monday the 28th day
of
February last as on Tuesday the 1st day of March last upon
the
Petition and Appeal of David Severs of Willow End, Chapel
Lane,
Long Marston, near Tring, Hertfordshire, praying that the
matter
of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely an
Order
of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 12th day of May
1993,
might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court
of
Parliament and that the said Order might be reversed, varied
or
altered or that the Petitioner might have such other relief
in
the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court
of
Parliament might seem meet; as upon the case of
Katherine
Elizabeth Hunt (now Severs) lodged in answer to the said
Appeal;
and due consideration had this day of what was offered on
either
side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by
the Lords Spiritual and
Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her
Majesty the Queen
assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's
Court of Appeal
of the 12th day of May 1993 complained of in the
said Appeal be,
and the same is hereby, Set Aside and that
the Order of Mr.
Latham Q.C. (sitting as a Deputy High Court
Judge) of the 15th
day of April 1992 be, and the same is hereby,
so Varied that the
amount of damages be reduced by £89,936:
And it is further
Ordered. That the Respondent do pay or
cause to be paid to the
said Appellant the Costs incurred by him
in the Court of Appeal
and in respect of the said Appeal to this
House, the total amount
thereof not to exceed £20,000 and
the amount of such Costs in
this House to be certified by the
Clerk of the Parliaments if not
agreed between the parties: And it
is also further Ordered. That
the costs of the Respondent
be taxed in accordance with the Legal
Aid Act 1988: And it is also
further Ordered. That the Cause be,
and the same is hereby,
remitted back to the Queen's Bench
Division of the High Court of
Justice to do therein as shall be
just and consistent with this
Judgment.
Cler: Parliamentor:
Judgment: 28 April 1994
HOUSE OF LORDS
HUNT
(NOW SEVERS) (A.P.)
(RESPONDENT)
v.
SEVERS
(APPELLANT)
Lord
Keith
Lord
Bridge of Harwich
Lord
Jauncey of Tullichettle
Lord
Browne-Wilkinson
Lord
Nolan
LORD KEITH OF KINKEL
My Lords,
For the reasons
given in the speech prepared by my noble and learned
friend, Lord
Bridge of Harwich, which I have read in draft and with which
I
agree, I would allow this appeal and make the order he proposes.
LORD BRIDGE OF HARWICH
My Lords,
A plaintiff who…
Continue reading Hunt v Severs
Sign in free to access the full text
- Case
- [1994] UKHL 4
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.