Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc

Link copied
Case Copied 46 min read

    Parliamentary Archives,
    HL/PO/JU/18/253

    Cambridge Water Company (Respondents)

    v.
    Eastern Counties Leather plc (Appellants)

    JUDGMENT

    Die Jovis 9° Decembris 1993

    Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to whom was
    referred the Cause Cambridge Water Company against Eastern
    Counties Leather plc, That the Committee had heard Counsel as
    well on Monday the 11th as on Tuesday the 12th, Wednesday the
    13th, Thursday the 14th, Monday the 18th and Tuesday the 19th
    days of October last upon the Petition and Appeal of Eastern
    Counties Leather plc of Langford Arch, London Road, Sawston,
    Cambridgeshire, CB2 4EG, praying that the matter of the Order set
    forth in the Schedule thereto, namely an Order of Her Majesty's
    Court of Appeal of the 19th day of November 1992, might be
    reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament
    and that the said Order might be reversed, varied or altered or
    that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises
    as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament might seem
    meet; as upon the case of Cambridge Water Company lodged in
    answer to the said Appeal; and due consideration had this day of
    what was offered on either side in this Cause:

    It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and
    Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen
    assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal
    of the 19th day of November 1992 complained of in the said Appeal
    be, and the same is hereby, Set Aside and that the Order of Mr.
    Justice Kennedy of the 31st day of July 1991 be, and the same is
    hereby, Restored: And it is further Ordered. That the
    Respondents do pay or cause to be paid to the said Appellants the
    Costs incurred by them in the Court of Appeal and in respect of
    the said Appeal to this House, the amount of such last-mentioned
    costs to be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not
    agreed between the parties: And it is also further Ordered. That
    the Cause be, and the same is hereby, remitted back to the
    Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice to do therein
    as shall be just and consistent with this Judgment.

    Cler: Parliamentor:

    Judgment: 9 December 1993

    HOUSE OF LORDS


    CAMBRIDGE WATER COMPANY
    (RESPONDENTS)

    v.

    EASTERN COUNTIES LEATHER PLC.
    (APPELLANTS)


    Lord Templeman
    Lord Goff of Chieveley
    Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle
    Lord Lowry
    Lord Woolf


    LORD TEMPLEMAN

    My Lords,

    For the reasons given in the speech by my noble and learned friend,
    Lord Goff of Chieveley I would allow this appeal.

    LORD GOFF OF CHIEVELEY

    My Lords.


    This appeal is concerned with the question whether the appellant
    company. Eastern Counties Leather Plc (ECL), is liable to the respondent
    company. Cambridge Water Company (CWC), in damages in respect of
    damage suffered by reason of the contamination of water available for
    abstraction at CWC's borehole at Sawston Mill near Cambridge. The
    contamination was caused by a solvent…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[1993] UKHL 12
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.