Usar Napier Limited v Herbert

Case [2022] NZHC 90


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND NAPIER REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA AHURIRI ROHE

CIV-2021-441-8

[2022] NZHC 90

BETWEEN

USAR NAPIER LIMITED

Plaintiff

AND

MALCOLM ANDREW HERBERT

First Defendant

AND

ANTHONY JAMES HERBERT

Second Defendant

AND

ANTHONY JAMES HERBERT and

STEPHEN PETER LUNN, as trustees of the THACKERAY TRUST

Third Defendants

AND

ANTHONY JAMES HERBERT and

STEPHEN PETER LUNN, as trustees of the CHARLES STREET TRUST

Fourth Defendants

Hearing: (Determined on the papers)

Counsel:

S M Lowery and J C Suyker for Plaintiff J K Mahuta-Coyle for Defendants

Judgment:

4 February 2022


JUDGMENT No. 2 OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE LESTER


USAR NAPIER LIMITED v HERBERT [2022] NZHC 90 [4 February 2022]

[1]        In a judgment dated 5 October 2021,1 I granted summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff for amounts payable under an agreement that settled its rights under an agreement to lease a building in Napier which the defendants were converting into    a hotel.

[2]        Under the settlement agreement, two  initial lump  sums were  payable with   a further   sum   payable   by   instalments.    The   final   instalment   was   due   on  5 December 2021. As the judgment was released on 5 October 2021, the instalments due on 5 November 2021 and 5 December 2021 had not fallen due for payment.

[3]        The judgment of 5 October 2021 entered judgment as to liability in respect of those outstanding payments.

[4]        On 14 December 2021, counsel for the plaintiff filed a memorandum seeking judgment as to quantum for the two outstanding instalments together with interest.

[5]No memorandum in response has been filed by the defendants.

[6]        Accordingly, as I am satisfied there is no issue as to the quantum of the outstanding instalments and no issue has been taken in that regard, there is judgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants in the sum of $55,555.54, being the two final monthly instalments of $27,777.77, together with interest of $4,332.19, giving a total judgment sum of $59,887.73.

[7]The call of this matter in the next Napier List is vacated.


Associate Judge Lester

Solicitors:

Anthony Harper, Christchurch

Copy to counsel: S M Lowery, Barrister, Auckland

Lawson Robinson, Napier
Copy to counsel: J K Mahuta-Coyle, Barrister, Wellington


1      USAR Napier Ltd v Herbert [2021] NZHC 2638.

Details
AGLC
Usar Napier Limited v Herbert [2022] NZHC 90
Case
[2022] NZHC 90
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The plaintiff, Usar Napier Limited, filed an application for judgment as to quantum in the High Court of New Zealand, Napier Registry, against the defendants, Herbert and others, following a previous judgment that granted summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff for amounts payable under a settlement agreement related to a lease for a hotel conversion project. The plaintiff sought judgment for the outstanding instalments and interest, which had not yet fallen due at the time of the previous judgment.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the plaintiff was entitled to the two outstanding instalments of $27,777.77 each, together with interest of $4,332.19. The court had to determine if there were any issues regarding the quantum of the outstanding payments and if any objections had been raised by the defendants. The court also needed to consider whether the interest calculated by the plaintiff was appropriate.

The court found that there was no dispute as to the quantum of the outstanding instalments and no objections were raised by the defendants. The plaintiff's calculation of interest was also deemed appropriate. Therefore, the court granted judgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants in the sum of $55,555.54, comprising the two final monthly instalments and interest, totaling $59,887.73. The court vacated the call of this matter in the next Napier List.

The court ordered that Usar Napier Limited recover from the first and second defendants the sum of $59,887.73, including the two final monthly instalments and interest. The call of this matter in the next Napier List was vacated.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.