IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND NAPIER REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA AHURIRI ROHE
CIV-2021-441-8
[2022] NZHC 90
BETWEEN USAR NAPIER LIMITED
Plaintiff
AND
MALCOLM ANDREW HERBERT
First Defendant
AND
ANTHONY JAMES HERBERT
Second Defendant
AND
ANTHONY JAMES HERBERT and
STEPHEN PETER LUNN, as trustees of the THACKERAY TRUST
Third Defendants
AND
ANTHONY JAMES HERBERT and
STEPHEN PETER LUNN, as trustees of the CHARLES STREET TRUST
Fourth Defendants
Hearing: (Determined on the papers) Counsel:
S M Lowery and J C Suyker for Plaintiff J K Mahuta-Coyle for Defendants
Judgment:
4 February 2022
JUDGMENT No. 2 OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE LESTER
USAR NAPIER LIMITED v HERBERT [2022] NZHC 90 [4 February 2022]
[1] In a judgment dated 5 October 2021,1 I granted summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff for amounts payable under an agreement that settled its rights under an agreement to lease a building in Napier which the defendants were converting into a hotel.
[2] Under the settlement agreement, two initial lump sums were payable with a further sum payable by instalments. The final instalment was due on 5 December 2021. As the judgment was released on 5 October 2021, the instalments due on 5 November 2021 and 5 December 2021 had not fallen due for payment.
[3] The judgment of 5 October 2021 entered judgment as to liability in respect of those outstanding payments.
[4] On 14 December 2021, counsel for the plaintiff filed a memorandum seeking judgment as to quantum for the two outstanding instalments together with interest.
[5]No memorandum in response has been filed by the defendants.
[6] Accordingly, as I am satisfied there is no issue as to the quantum of the outstanding instalments and no issue has been taken in that regard, there is judgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants in the sum of $55,555.54, being the two final monthly instalments of $27,777.77, together with interest of $4,332.19, giving a total judgment sum of $59,887.73.
[7]The call of this matter in the next Napier List is vacated.
Associate Judge Lester
Solicitors:
Anthony Harper, Christchurch
Copy to counsel: S M Lowery, Barrister, Auckland
Lawson Robinson, Napier
Copy to counsel: J K Mahuta-Coyle, Barrister, Wellington
- AGLC
- Usar Napier Limited v Herbert [2022] NZHC 90
- Case
- [2022] NZHC 90
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the plaintiff was entitled to the two outstanding instalments of $27,777.77 each, together with interest of $4,332.19. The court had to determine if there were any issues regarding the quantum of the outstanding payments and if any objections had been raised by the defendants. The court also needed to consider whether the interest calculated by the plaintiff was appropriate.
The court found that there was no dispute as to the quantum of the outstanding instalments and no objections were raised by the defendants. The plaintiff's calculation of interest was also deemed appropriate. Therefore, the court granted judgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants in the sum of $55,555.54, comprising the two final monthly instalments and interest, totaling $59,887.73. The court vacated the call of this matter in the next Napier List.
The court ordered that Usar Napier Limited recover from the first and second defendants the sum of $59,887.73, including the two final monthly instalments and interest. The call of this matter in the next Napier List was vacated.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.