IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WHANGANUI REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA WHANGANUI ROHE
CRI-2018-083-000018
[2018] NZHC 2146
THE QUEEN v
HAYZE NEIHANA WAITOKIA
Counsel: H C Mallalieu for Crown
R B Crowley for Defendant
Sentence:
21 August 2018
NOTES ON SENTENCE OF COLLINS J
Introduction
[1] Mr Waitokia, you appear for sentencing on one charge of wounding with intent to injure.1
[2]This afternoon I will:
(1)set out your offending;
(2)outline the effect of the three strikes regime;
(3)explain whether the manifestly unjust exception applies in your circumstances; and
1 Crimes Act 1961, s 188(2); maximum penalty seven years’ imprisonment.
R v WAITOKIA [2018] NZHC 2146 [21 August 2018]
(4)give you your final sentence.
Summary of offending
[3] On 4 January 2018, you were drinking alcohol with several associates at the Marton Hotel, where you were living while on bail. There is evidence you had been drinking for seven to eight hours. An argument broke out between you and the victim, who believed you had stolen his phone. The victim was sitting next to you on a couch. You produced a knife with a retractable blade and stabbed the victim in the leg about 20 cm below his knee. This happened without any warning and produced a wound approximately 2 cm in length, and 0.5 cm deep, into the victim’s calf muscle, which required medical attention including three sutures.2 You were described by police who arrived at the scene as being belligerent, aggressive and intoxicated.
Personal circumstances
[4] You are 26 years old. You have 14 previous convictions, including six for violent offending, many of which involved domestic violence. In 2012, you were sentenced to five months’ home detention for wounding with intent to injure. You were given your first-strike warning on this occasion. In 2014, you were sentenced to three years’ imprisonment for sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection. You were given your second-strike warning on this occasion. You were sentenced to four months’ imprisonment for domestic violence assaults in March of this year.
Three strikes regime
[5] This is your third-strike offence. In those circumstances, s 86D(2) of the Sentencing Act 2002 requires me to sentence you to the maximum term of imprisonment for your offence. In your case, that is a sentence of seven years’ imprisonment. There is no discretion to allow any discount for the circumstances of your offending, or for your personal circumstances. I acknowledge that this sentence is disproportionate to the gravity of your offending, but that is the intent of the three
2 The summary of facts refers to the wound being 5 cm long. The medical report on file and witness statements refer to the wound being 2 cm long. The wound was to the front and side of the victim’s lower right leg. The unusual location of the wound is not relevant to my assessment. It is possible that, as the victim was sitting on a couch, he may have raised his bent legs to bear the brunt…
Continue reading R v Waitokia
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Waitokia [2018] NZHC 2146
- Case
- [2018] NZHC 2146
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.