IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND DUNEDIN REGISTRY
CRI-2013-412-002556 [2015] NZHC 286
THE QUEEN
v
STEVEN KENNETH BOSKELL ROBERT JAMES CUMMINGS RYAN WARREN GEARY-SMART
JACOB CHRISTOPHER GEARY-SMART
STEPHANIE ROSE MCCORMACK AKA STEPHANIE ROSE LAWRENCE
Hearing: 20 February 2015 Appearances:
L C Preston for Crown
J A Westgate for S K Boskell
A Stevens and A Logan for R J Cummings
D J More and A More for R W Geary-SmartJ M Ablett-Kerr QC and S A Saunderson-Warner for R W Geary-Smart
M Winders for S R McCormack/Lawrence
Judgment:
20 February 2015
SENTENCING NOTES OF OF GENDALL J
NOTE: Names of victim’s children, their ages and details of home detention
address have been redacted.
R v BOSKELL & ORS [2015] NZHC 286 [20 February 2015]
Introduction
[1] Steven Boskell, Robert Cummings, Jacob Geary-Smart and Ryan Geary- Smart you appear today for sentencing for the murder of Justin McFarlane. Stephanie McCormack, you appear today for sentencing for being an accessory after the fact to murder. You were all five convicted after being found guilty by a jury on
12 December 2014. This followed a nine week trial here in Dunedin. [2] You may all remain seated until I ask you to stand.
[3] Before getting into the detail of my remarks today can I please begin by acknowledging the presence of everybody here today. To the family and friends of the victim in this case, Mr McFarlane, who was tragically taken from you at a relatively young age, there is nothing I am able to say, or do, that can ever replace your loss. A dearly loved father, son, brother, partner, friend and relative has been taken from you. There is nothing I can say or do to change that but the sympathy of this Court is with you all.
Three strikes warning
[4] I want to talk first and just mention the three strikes warning.
[5] When on 12 December 2014 I entered convictions following your trial, I gave those of you convicted of murder, Mr Boskell, Mr Cummings, Mr Ryan Geary-Smart and Mr Jacob Geary-Smart a ‘three-strikes’ warning as required under the legislation. You know what that means and I will not repeat it here.
The offending
[6] I now want to turn to set out the facts of the offending as I have found them.
[7] Mr Boskell, Mr Cummings, Mr Ryan Geary-Smart and Mr Jacob Geary- Smart, on the day and evening of the Tuesday in 2013 in question you were engaged in the consumption of alcohol and drugs. At some point one or more of your group raised the idea of travelling to Mr McFarlane’s property for the purpose of stealing a
motorbike and obtaining drugs. It is clear the idea to steal a motorbike came from
Mr Jacob Geary-Smart. Ultimately you elected to do so.
[8] In the early morning that night of the Wednesday Ms McCormack drove you all to Mr McFarlane’s property in Mr Ryan Geary-Smart’s Nissan Skyline vehicle. When you arrived,…
Continue reading R v Boskell
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Boskell [2015] NZHC 286
- Case
- [2015] NZHC 286
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.