Moncrief-Spittle v Regional Facilities Auckland Limited

[2021] NZSC 94

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

I TE KŌTI MANA NUI

 SC 57/2021
 [2021] NZSC 94

BETWEEN	MALCOLM BRUCE MONCRIEF‑SPITTLE First Applicant DAVID CUMIN Second Applicant
AND	REGIONAL FACILITIES AUCKLAND LIMITED First Respondent AUCKLAND COUNCIL Second Respondent

Court:	William Young, O’Regan and Ellen France JJ
Counsel:	J E Hodder QC, P A Joseph and J K Grimmer for Applicants K Anderson for Respondents
Judgment:	5 August 2021

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

ALeave to appeal is granted (Moncrief‑Spittle v Regional Facilities Auckland Ltd [2021] NZCA 142).

BThe approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the appeal against the High Court’s substantive decision.

____________________________________________________________________

Solicitors:
Franks Ogilvie, Wellington for Applicants
Anthony Harper, Auckland for Respondents