IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
CIV-2016-404-000978 [2016] NZHC 1393
IN THE MATTER of an application for approval of an
arrangement under Part 15 of the
Companies Act 1993BETWEEN
MICHAEL HILL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
First Applicant
ACN 610 937 598 LTD Second Applicant
Hearing: 23 June 2016 Counsel:
GF Fitzgerald and AF Kissling for Applicants
Judgment:
23 June 2016
JUDGMENT OF ASHER J
Solicitors:
Kensington Swan, Wellington.
MICHAEL HILL INTERNATIONAL LTD [2016] NZHC 1393 [23 June 2016]
[1] Michael Hill International Ltd (the company) is seeking orders approving a scheme of arrangement, proposed by that company and ACN 610 937 598 Ltd (MHI Australia) under Part 15 of the Companies Act 1993. The scheme is part of a proposed restructure of the Michael Hill group of companies. The result of the restructure will be that MHI Australia will replace the company as the parent company of the group. MHI Australia will be an Australian incorporated company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. It will also be listed on the NZX main board as a dual listed issuer.
[2] The details of the scheme were set out in a scheme booklet. In summary it was proposed under the scheme:
aMHI Australia acquires from each shareholder in the Company (Shareholder) other than Durante Holdings Pty Limited (Hill HoldCo) all their shares in the Company in consideration for the issue by MHI Australia of MHI Australia shares to each such Shareholder on a one-for-one basis subject to and on the terms set out in the Scheme Booklet;
b the Company changes its name to ‘Michael Hill New Zealand
Limited’;
cMHI Australia will change its name to ‘Michael Hill International Limited’ when, and provided that, it is available under Australian law; and
dall employee options are novated from the Company to MHI Australia on substantially the same terms except that the options will relate to MHI Australia shares in the place of shares in the Company.
[3] Together with a separate transaction involving MHI Australia acquiring the shares in Durante Holdings Pty Ltd (Hill HoldCo), the scheme will enable the restructure to occur.
[4] A without notice interlocutory application for orders dispensing with service and representation was filed, and for initial orders as to the procedure to be adopted for the Part 15 application. Following a hearing before me on 24 May 2016, after having discussed some changes and additions to the scheme booklet, which were made, I made initial orders under Part 15 of the Companies Act, orders dispensing
with service and representation, and following some amendments I made the interlocutory orders sought.1
[5] In my assessment the material presented to the shareholders was in sufficient detail for the shareholders of all groups to form a reasoned judgment as to the proposal.2
[6] To grant an order under s 236 of the Companies Act the Court must be satisfied that:3
(a) There has been compliance with the statutory provisions as to meetings, resolutions, the Court orders and similar procedural requirements.
Continue reading Michael Hill International Limited
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Michael Hill International Limited [2016] NZHC 1393
- Case
- [2016] NZHC 1393
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered several legal issues, including compliance with statutory requirements, fairness to shareholders, representation of shareholder classes, and the overall fairness and equity of the arrangement. The court found that the scheme complied with procedural requirements, provided shareholders with necessary information, ensured fair representation, and was fair and equitable overall. The court also noted that the Takeovers Panel had no objections to the scheme.
The court reasoned that the scheme aligned with the evolution of the Michael Hill group into an international entity with a significant presence in Australia. The restructuring aimed to reduce administrative complexity and open the company to a wider investor base. The court concluded that the scheme did not prejudice any particular group of shareholders, employees, or creditors and was fair and equitable in the circumstances.
The court approved the scheme of arrangement, making specific orders under Part 15 of the Companies Act 1993. The scheme was declared binding upon the company, its shareholders, ACN 610 937 598 Ltd, and other necessary persons. The orders included the acquisition of shares, changes in company names, and the novation of employee options. Formal service and representation in the proceeding were dispensed with.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.