Michael Hill International Limited

Case [2016] NZHC 1393


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY

CIV-2016-404-000978 [2016] NZHC 1393

IN THE MATTER

of an application for approval of an

arrangement under Part 15 of the
Companies Act 1993

BETWEEN

MICHAEL HILL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

First Applicant

ACN 610 937 598 LTD Second Applicant

Hearing: 23 June 2016

Counsel:

GF Fitzgerald and AF Kissling for Applicants

Judgment:

23 June 2016

JUDGMENT OF ASHER J

Solicitors:

Kensington Swan, Wellington.

MICHAEL HILL INTERNATIONAL LTD [2016] NZHC 1393 [23 June 2016]

[1]      Michael Hill International Ltd (the company) is seeking orders approving a scheme of arrangement,  proposed by that company and ACN 610 937 598  Ltd (MHI Australia) under Part 15 of the Companies Act 1993.  The scheme is part of a proposed restructure of the Michael Hill group of companies.   The result of the restructure  will  be  that  MHI Australia  will  replace  the  company  as  the  parent company of the group.  MHI Australia will be an Australian incorporated company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange.  It will also be listed on the NZX main board as a dual listed issuer.

[2]      The details of the scheme were set out in a scheme booklet.  In summary it was proposed under the scheme:

aMHI Australia  acquires  from  each  shareholder  in  the  Company (Shareholder)  other  than  Durante  Holdings  Pty  Limited  (Hill HoldCo) all their shares in the Company in consideration for the issue by MHI Australia of MHI Australia shares to each such Shareholder on a one-for-one basis subject to and on the terms set out in the Scheme Booklet;

b        the  Company  changes  its  name  to  ‘Michael  Hill  New  Zealand

Limited’;

cMHI Australia will change its name to ‘Michael Hill International Limited’ when, and provided that, it is available under Australian law; and

dall  employee  options  are  novated  from  the  Company  to  MHI Australia on substantially the same terms except that the options will relate to MHI Australia shares in the place of shares in the Company.

[3]      Together with a separate transaction involving MHI Australia acquiring the shares  in  Durante  Holdings  Pty  Ltd  (Hill  HoldCo),  the scheme  will  enable the restructure to occur.

[4]      A without notice interlocutory application for orders dispensing with service and representation was filed, and for initial orders as to the procedure to be adopted for the Part 15 application.  Following a hearing before me on 24 May 2016, after having discussed some changes and additions to the scheme booklet, which were made, I made initial orders under Part 15 of the Companies Act, orders dispensing

with service and representation, and following some amendments I made the interlocutory orders sought.1

[5]      In my assessment the material presented to the shareholders was in sufficient detail for the shareholders of all groups to form a reasoned judgment as to the proposal.2

[6]      To grant an order under s 236 of the Companies Act the Court must be satisfied that:3

(a)      There  has  been  compliance  with  the  statutory  provisions  as  to meetings, resolutions, the Court orders and similar procedural requirements.

Continue reading Michael Hill International Limited

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Michael Hill International Limited [2016] NZHC 1393
Case
[2016] NZHC 1393
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, Michael Hill International Ltd and ACN 610 937 598 Ltd, sought approval for a scheme of arrangement under Part 15 of the Companies Act 1993. The scheme was proposed to restructure the Michael Hill group of companies, resulting in ACN 610 937 598 Ltd replacing Michael Hill International Ltd as the parent company. The scheme involved the acquisition of shares from shareholders, changes in company names, and the novation of employee options. The court was required to determine whether the scheme complied with statutory provisions and was fair and equitable to all shareholders.

The court considered several legal issues, including compliance with statutory requirements, fairness to shareholders, representation of shareholder classes, and the overall fairness and equity of the arrangement. The court found that the scheme complied with procedural requirements, provided shareholders with necessary information, ensured fair representation, and was fair and equitable overall. The court also noted that the Takeovers Panel had no objections to the scheme.

The court reasoned that the scheme aligned with the evolution of the Michael Hill group into an international entity with a significant presence in Australia. The restructuring aimed to reduce administrative complexity and open the company to a wider investor base. The court concluded that the scheme did not prejudice any particular group of shareholders, employees, or creditors and was fair and equitable in the circumstances.

The court approved the scheme of arrangement, making specific orders under Part 15 of the Companies Act 1993. The scheme was declared binding upon the company, its shareholders, ACN 610 937 598 Ltd, and other necessary persons. The orders included the acquisition of shares, changes in company names, and the novation of employee options. Formal service and representation in the proceeding were dispensed with.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.