Kohn v Kohn

Case [2014] NZHC 1154


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND GISBORNE REGISTRY

CIV 2014-416-20 [2014] NZHC 1154

BETWEEN

DION HAMILTON KOHN and JULIAN

WILFRED KOHN Plaintiffs

AND

JENNIFER MARIAN KOHN Defendant

Hearing: (on the papers)

Counsel:

E R Revington for Plaintiffs
No appearance by or on behalf of Defendant

Judgment:

28 May 2014

JUDGMENT OF HEATH J

This judgment was delivered by me on 28 May 2014 at 4.00pm pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules

Registrar/Deputy Registrar

Solicitors:

Woodward Chrisp, Gisborne

KOHN v KOHN [2014] NZHC 1154 [28 May 2014]

[1]      Mr Dion Kohn and Mr Julian Kohn are trustees of the Dion and Jennifer Kohn Family Trust (the Trust).   The Trust was established on 18 May 1999.   Mr Dion Kohn’s wife, Jennifer, is also a trustee.

[2]      There is evidence that Mrs Jennifer Kohn suffers from dementia and that this condition has existed for some time.  That evidence is in the form of a report from a consultant  psycho-geriatrician  attached  to  Tairawhiti  District  Health,  dated  24

February 2014.

[3]      On  30  March  2005,  Mrs  Jennifer  Kohn  executed  an  enduring  power  of attorney in favour of her husband, in relation to her property.  This was done for the purpose of Part IX of the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988.  The power of attorney granted expressly stated that the authority “shall not be revoked if I become mentally incapable”.

[4]      The trustees of the Trust own a property at 24 Heatherlea Street in Gisborne.

The  present  proceeding  has  been  issued  to  obtain  a  vesting  order1

so  that  the

property  may  be  transferred  into  the  names  of  Messrs  Dion  and  Julian  Kohn, together with Ms Sarah Deighton and Ms Joanna Ebbett.  Ms Deighton and Ms

Ebbett are Mr and Mrs Kohn’s daughters.

[5]      Mrs Jennifer Kohn was removed as a trustee and replaced by Ms Deighton and  Ms  Ebbett,  through  the  remaining  trustees  exercising  powers  conferred  by s 43(1) of the Trustee Act 1956.   That was done because Mrs Jennifer Kohn was

unfit to act as a trustee, by virtue of her medical condition.

[6]      The purpose of the vesting order is to regularise the position so that all present trustees are shown as the registered proprietors.  The District Land Registrar will not accept the use of the power of attorney and the existing Deed of Removal and Appointment of New Trustees to facilitate that transfer.

[7]      In form, the application before me is for directions as to service; to dispense with the need to serve Mrs Jennifer Kohn.  I am satisfied that such an order should

1      Trustee Act 1956, s 52(1)(h).

be made.   Once made, I can see no basis on which a substantive order should be refused.  For that reason, I propose to deal with the substantive proceeding now.

[8]      I  am  satisfied  that  an  order  should  be  made  vesting  the  property  at  24

Heatherlea Street, Gisborne (Lot 1 DP 7071 GS4D/1204 Gisborne Registry) in the names of Dion Hamilton Kohn, Julian Wilfred Kohn, Sarah Louise Deighton and Joanna Frances Ebbett.  Although this will not be shown on the register, the vesting order is made on the basis that they are to hold the property as trustees for the Trust.

[9]      For those reasons, I make an order dispensing with service on Mrs Jennifer

Kohn and make a vesting order in the terms set out in para [8] above.

[10]     All costs in relation to the application shall be paid out of the Trust’s funds.

P R Heath J

Delivered at 4.00pm on 28 May 2014

Details
AGLC
Kohn v Kohn [2014] NZHC 1154
Case
[2014] NZHC 1154
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Kohn v Kohn, Dion Hamilton Kohn and Julian Wilfred Kohn, trustees of the Dion and Jennifer Kohn Family Trust, brought an application against Jennifer Marian Kohn, also a trustee, to vest property at 24 Heatherlea Street in Gisborne into their names. The plaintiffs sought to replace Jennifer as a trustee due to her dementia and to regularise the property's title by obtaining a vesting order. The case was heard in the High Court of New Zealand, Gisborne Registry.

The legal issues before the court were whether the power of attorney granted to Dion Kohn was valid and whether the court should make a vesting order to transfer the property to the plaintiffs and their daughters. The court had to consider whether dispensing with service on Jennifer Kohn was appropriate and whether the vesting order should be granted to reflect the current trustees accurately.

Justice Heath ruled that the enduring power of attorney granted to Dion Kohn was valid and irrevocable, even if Jennifer became mentally incapable. Given Jennifer's unfitness to act as a trustee, the court found that dispensing with service on her was appropriate. The court granted the vesting order, holding that the new trustees would manage the property for the Trust. The court also ordered that all costs related to the application be paid from the Trust's funds.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.