IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND PALMERSTON NORTH REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE PAPAIOEA ROHE
CIV-2024-454-95 [2025] NZHC 1827
UNDERthe Trust Act 2019 and the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015
IN THE MATTER of the breach of ss 45(d), 45(g) and 45(i) of
the Trust Act 2019 and s 19(1)(a) of the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015
BETWEEN SCOTT STEPHEN GUTHRIE
Plaintiff
AND NICOLA WILLIAMS
First Defendant
ROBERT FINCH
Second Defendant
SUSAN FREEMAN
Third Defendant
Hearing: 5 June 2025 Appearances: Plaintiff In Person
D R Weatherley for Defendants
Judgment 4 July 2025
JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE SKELTON
Introduction
[1] These proceedings relate to a charitable trust, the Transforming Justice Foundation (the Trust). The plaintiff founded the Trust, and the defendants became trustees. The plaintiff alleges he has suffered loss because of breaches of the Trusts Act 2019 by the defendants. He also alleges that the third defendant committed
GUTHRIE v WILLIAMS [2025] NZHC 1827 [4 July 2025]
perjury, and he seeks an order that all electronic media publications making false allegations or insinuations about him relating to the Trust be removed.
[2] The defendants have applied for strike out of the plaintiff’s claim, and/or summary judgment against the plaintiff on the basis that there is no tenable cause of action pleaded and the plaintiff’s claim cannot succeed. They also apply for orders as to costs.
Background and Procedural History
[3] On 10 July 2019, the plaintiff (Mr Guthrie) established the Trust. The trust deed itself did not identify the trustees, but he was the sole founding trustee.
[4] On 1 September 2019, Mr Guthrie retired as trustee, and appointed the first and second defendants (Ms Williams, then named Ms O’Leary, and Mr Finch, respectively) as trustees in his place. Mr Guthrie remained employed by the Trust, as its CEO. On 18 May 2020, Mr Finch appointed the third defendant (Ms Freeman) as trustee. The trust deed was amended in July 2020.
[5] From 6 June 2020, the Trust employed Christine Rankin as spokesperson on child abuse issues.1 Mr Guthrie did not inform the Trust about Mrs Rankin’s employment, and when she raised concerns with non-payment of her salary, he paid her $10,000 from his personal bank account, listing the name of the Trust and his name in the payment details.2
[6] On 31 January 2021, Mr Finch, in his position as Board Chairperson, terminated Mr Guthrie’s employment and advised him to cease all activities on behalf of the Trust.3 The reason given for this was that Mr Guthrie had engaged Mrs Rankin as an employee without the knowledge of the Board, damaging the image and credibility of the Trust and rendering it liable for remuneration payments, risking it being wound up. In March 2021, the Department of Internal Affairs issued a report
1 As established by Rankin v Transforming Justice Foundation [2023] NZERA 420 [First ERA Determination].
2 Rankin v Transforming Justice Foundation [2024] NZERA 145 [Second ERA Determination] at [50].
3 At [17].
which concluded…
- AGLC
- Guthrie v Williams [2025] NZHC 1827
- Case
- [2025] NZHC 1827
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.