Drummond v Davidson

Case [2016] NZHC 1888


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY

CIV 2014-485-603664 [2016] NZHC 1888

IN THE MATTER

of the will of WILLIAM FRANK

SHEWARD

BETWEEN

JOHN WINSTON DRUMMOND AND PETER JOHN CORDNER

Plaintiffs

AND

ALASTAIR ROBERT DAVIDSON AND NEROLI CHRISTINE DAVIDSON

First Defendants

AND

PRUNELLA ANN DOWNES Second Defendant

AND

GUARDIANS OF AKAROA HOSPITAL LIMITED

Third Defendant

Hearing: 9 March, 23 to 30 June and 1 July 2016

Appearances:

G M Brodie for Plaintiffs (9 March and 23 June) BRD Burke and M K Crimp for First Defendants

R W Raymond QC and A M Toohey for Second Defendant
No appearance for Third Defendant

Judgment:

15 August 2016

JUDGMENT OF DUNNINGHAM J

Re SHEWARD, DRUMMOND AND CORDNER v DAVIDSON [2016] NZHC 1888 [15 August 2016]

Table of Contents

Introduction ..........................................................................................................[1] Mr Sheward ........................................................................................................ [11] The Davidsons.....................................................................................................[23] Prunella Downes.................................................................................................[29]

The other people in Mr Sheward’s life .............................................................[40] Graeme Curry  [41] Frank Miessen  [43] Wiremu Tainui  [46] Joy and Henry Green  [48] David Beattie  [51] Michael Price  [54] Johnathan Ballantyne  [56]

Previous wills ......................................................................................................[61]

What happened from 2010 onwards? ..............................................................[66] Falling out with Wi Tainui  [67] The private care arrangements with Ms Downes  [74] The gift of the Subaru Forrester car  [81] Christmas 2011  [86] The 2011 will  [87] Sale of the Cabstand to the Davidsons  [92] Purchase of the 1997 Forrester  [94] Payment of the balance of the Cabstand purchase  [95] Mr Sheward’s accounts and wills  [101] Communication with Mr Walker’s firm  [108] The CRT account  [112] Christmas 2012  [115] Mr Sheward’s relationship with the Downes children  [122] Sarah Downes and the house at Rue Balguerie  [128] Subdivision discussions prior to making new wills  [136] The 14 April will  [138] Events leading to the execution of the 18 April will  [145] Ongoing discussions about subdivision  [158] Mr Sheward’s hospitalisation and death  [161] The commencement of proceedings  [165]

Want of knowledge and approval – legal principles .....................................[172] Was there knowledge and approval of the terms of the 18 April will? .......[175] Undue influence – legal principles ..................................................................[187] Was the 14 April will procured through undue influence? ..........................[200] Was the 18 April will procured through undue influence? ..........................[223] Outcome ............................................................................................................[234]

Introduction

[1]      William Frank Sheward, known to all as Frank, lived a long and full life.  He was born in 1925, spent his childhood in Christchurch and, at 18 was called up to serve in World War 2.  However, he loved Akaroa and ended up moving there after he returned to New Zealand.  At Akaroa he was able to foster his love of boats.  He also met his future wife Betty there and they married in 1948.  In due course they bought a two-storey wooden colonial house on Rue Balguerie on about 6.5 acres of land.  Mr Sheward then branched out into farming, breeding Murray Grey cattle on two blocks of land he acquired on Banks Peninsula.  Eventually he became the local harbourmaster and also served as the Marine Search and Rescue Adviser for the Police for many years.

[2]      Mr…

Continue reading Drummond v Davidson

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Drummond v Davidson [2016] NZHC 1888
Case
[2016] NZHC 1888
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Drummond and Cordner v Davidson [2016] NZHC 1888 involved a dispute over the validity of two wills executed by William Frank Sheward. The Davidsons, who were friends and neighbours of Sheward, challenged the validity of the wills on the grounds of lack of knowledge and approval, and undue influence. The court found that the will dated 18 April 2013 was invalid due to want of knowledge and approval, and undue influence by Prunella Downes, Sheward's caregiver. The will dated 14 April 2013 was found to be valid and was granted probate in favour of the Davidsons and Cordner. The court also directed an exchange of submissions on costs among the parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.