Brooke Christie Rolleston and Brandon James Roche v The Queen

Case

[2019] NZSC 61

26 June 2019

No judgment structure available for this case.

NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 203 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. SEE

 NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF ANY COMPLAINANT UNDER THE AGE OF 18 YEARS WHO APPEARED AS A WITNESS OR NAMED WITNESS UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE PROHIBITED BY S 204 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. SEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

I TE KŌTI MANA NUI

 SC 17/2019
 [2019] NZSC 61
BETWEEN

BROOKE CHRISTIE ROLLESTON
Appellant

AND

THE QUEEN
Respondent

SC 18/2019

BETWEEN

BRANDON JAMES ROCHE
Appellant

AND

THE QUEEN
Respondent

Hearing:

20 June 2019

Court:

Winkelmann CJ, Glazebrook, O’Regan, Ellen France and Williams JJ

Counsel:

E Huda and T D A Harre for Appellant in SC 17/2019
A J Bailey for Appellant in SC 18/2019 
M J Lillico and K L Kensington for Respondent

Judgment:

26 June 2019

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Order made directing an inquiry to be undertaken by an independent practitioner of the jury foreperson in the appellants’ trial on terms to be settled following receipt of a memorandum from counsel.

____________________________________________________________________

[Reasons to follow]

Solicitors:
Patient & Williams, Christchurch for Appellant in SC 17/2019
Crown Law Office, Wellington for Respondent

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0