B v The Queen
Case
•
[2013] NZSC 37
•18 April 2013
No judgment structure available for this case.
| NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985. |
| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND |
| SC 12/2013 [2013] NZSC 37 |
| B (SC 12/2013) |
| v |
| THE QUEEN |
| Court: William Young and Chambers JJ |
| Counsel: R M Lithgow QC for Applicant |
| Judgment: 18 April 2013 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
A Leave to appeal is granted.
B The approved questions are whether:
(i)in light of ss 7 and 44 of the Evidence Act 2006, the Judge should have permitted the applicant to lead all (or some) of the proposed evidence; and
(ii)the apparent inconsistency of the jury’s verdicts warranted the allowing of the appeal.
____________________________________________________________________
Solicitors:
Crown Law Office, Wellington
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
B v The Queen [2013] NZSC 37
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0