IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND HAMILTON REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA KIRIKIRIROA ROHE
CIV-2019-419-000070
[2021] NZHC 1027
BETWEEN NORMAN CLIVE AUSTIN and MARGARET IRENE AUSTIN
PlaintiffsAND
RENTREZI 2 LIMITED
First Defendant
PRAGMA DESIGNER HOMES LIMITED
Second DefendantAHL RENTALS LIMITED
Third Defendant
Hearing: 19 – 23 April 2021 Appearances:
V A Whitfield for Plaintiffs
T M Braun and U B Keller for First and Second Defendants No appearance by or for the Third Defendant
Judgment:
10 May 2021
JUDGMENT OF WYLIE J
This judgment was delivered by Justice Wylie On 10 May 2021 at 12.00 noon
Pursuant to r 11.5 of the High Court Rules Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Date:…………………………
Solicitors/counsel:
O’Sheas Barristers & Solicitors, Hamilton/V Whitfield, Cambridge Braun Bond & Lomas Ltd, Hamilton
AUSTIN v RENTREZI 2 LIMITED [2021] NZHC 1027 [10 May 2021]
Introduction
[1] The plaintiffs, Norman and Margaret Austin, are the owners of a property located at 21 Hillary Street, Chedworth, Hamilton. Their property is accessed by a right of way.
[2] The right of way is likely to have been created sometime in 1974 or perhaps 1975. Initially it provided access to two other lots as well. In 2006, these two lots were subdivided and two new lots were created. The largest of the new lots was ultimately purchased by the first defendant, Rentrezi 2 Ltd (“Rentrezi”).
[3] Rentrezi has built four residential units on part of the lot it purchased. The construction works were carried out by the second defendant, Pragma Designer Homes Ltd (“Pragma”). The lot has been further subdivided and separate titles have issued for each of the new units and for the balance of the land. Rentrezi transferred the titles with the new units on them to Pragma, which in turn sold them to the third defendant, AHL Rentals Ltd (“AHL”). AHL retains the properties and the units are rented out to tenants. The tenants are using the right of way to access the units.
[4] In broad terms, these proceedings concern the use made of the right of way by Rentrezi and Pragma when the units were being built and the use being made of the right of way by AHL’s tenants now that the units have been completed.
Background
The right of way
[5] Hillary Street was previously a blind street terminating at the boundary of a large block of land. In 1973 this land was subdivided into a number of lots. The plan of the subdivision was deposited on 14 December 1973. It was allocated number DPS 17999. A copy of this plan is annexed – Annexure A.
[6] Hillary Street became a formed cul de sac as a result of the subdivision. The head of the cul-de-sac was shown as lot 21 on DPS 17999. It was to vest in the Hamilton City Council as a street. DPS 17999 also showed a right of way coming off lot 21 to provide access to lots 3, 4 and 5 on the plan. Each of them,…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Austin v Rentrezi 2 Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] NZHC 1027
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.