Zhou v Position Property Real Estate

Link copied
Case Copied 9 min read

QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


CITATION:

Zhou v Position Property Real Estate [2020] QCAT 42

PARTIES:

XIAOBIN ZHOU

(applicant)

v

POSITION PROPERTY REAL ESTATE

(respondent)

APPLICATION NO/S:

MCDT104-19

MATTER TYPE:

Other minor civil dispute matters

DELIVERED ON:

11 February 2020

HEARING DATE:

10 September 2019

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Member Lumb

ORDERS:

The Residential Tenancies Authority pay the rental bond under rental bond number 700338412 in respect of the property at 2/132A Perth Street, South Toowoomba, Queensland as follows:

(a)     the amount of $1,419.00 to the Respondent; and

(b)     the balance to the Applicant.

CATHWORDS:          

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS  – QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL  – minor civil dispute – residential tenancy – rental bond – claim for compensation for damage to premises –whether fair wear and tear

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 11, s 12(1), s 12(4)(f), Schedule 3
Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act2008 (Qld), s 137, s 188(4)

Griffin v Gini [2011] QCATA 325

Stockdale & Leggo v Gordon [2017] QCATA 112

APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:

Applicant:

Self-represented

Respondent:

N Petrie of Position Property Real Estate

REASONS FOR DECISION

Introduction

  1. The Applicant filed an application for minor civil dispute – residential tenancy dispute on 16 January 2019 (‘the application’), claiming, against the Respondent, that the full amount of the (disputed) bond, the subject of rental bond number 700338412 of $2,240.00 be paid to him. A Minor civil dispute – counter-application was filed on 17 June 2019 (‘the counter-application’), by which Ivan Costello (‘the Lessor’) by the Respondent makes a claim of $1,540.00 for damage to timber flooring at the subject property 2/132 Perth Street, South Toowoomba in the State of Queensland (‘the property’). The Lessor also claims application and preparation costs totalling $1,960.50. I assume that the reference to the total amount of $1,960.50 is inclusive of the claim amount, such that the additional amount claimed is $429.50.

  2. At the hearing, the Applicant was assisted by an interpreter, Mr Jiao Li.

  3. The application does not identify the section pursuant to which the application is brought but the relevant provision is s 137 of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld) (‘RTRA Act’).

  4. The first issue for determination is whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine this dispute.

    Jurisdiction

  5. I am satisfied that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear this matter.[1]

    [1]See ss 11, 12(1), 12(4)(f) of, and the definitions of ‘minor civil dispute’ and ‘tenancy matter’ in Schedule 3 to, the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) (‘the QCAT Act’) and s 137 of the RTRA Act.

    The Respondent’s claim for damage to the flooring

  6. Clause 37 of Part 2 of the tenancy agreement between the lessor and the Applicant (and two other persons) provides:

    At the end of the tenancy, the tenant must leave the premises, as far as possible, in the same condition they were in at the start of the tenancy, fair wear and tear excepted.

    Examples of what may be fair wear and…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Zhou v Position Property Real Estate and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] QCAT 42
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Zhou v Position Property Real Estate involved a dispute between a tenant, Zhou, and a property manager, Position Property Real Estate. The tenant sought compensation for damage to the timber flooring of the rental property, which the property manager denied. The case was heard in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT).

The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the damage to the timber flooring was due to the tenant's negligence or normal wear and tear, and if it constituted damage for which the tenant should be liable. The Tribunal had to determine the extent of the damage, whether the damage was due to wear and tear or negligence, and if any of the damage was the responsibility of the tenant.

The Tribunal found that some of the damage was due to normal wear and tear, while other damage was due to the tenant's negligence. The Tribunal awarded the sum of $1,419.00 as compensation for the damage that was the responsibility of the tenant. The Tribunal did not order either party to pay the other party's costs as both the tenant and the property manager were justified in filing their respective applications.

The Tribunal ordered that the Residential Tenancies Authority pay the rental bond under rental bond number 700338412 in respect of the property at 2/132A Perth Street, South Toowoomba, Queensland as follows: (a) the amount of $1,419.00 to the Respondent; and (b) the balance to the Applicant.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Residential Tenancies Authority pay the rental bond under rental bond number 700338412 in respect of the property at 2/132A Perth Street, South Toowoomba, Queensland as follows:

(a) the amount of $1,419.00 to the Respondent; and

(b) the balance to the Applicant.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

I allow the sum of $1,419.00 as compensation for the damaged timber flooring.Conclusion For the reasons stated above, I find that the counter-application succeeds to the extent of $1,419.00. Given that the Applicant and the Respondent were justified in filing the application and counter-application respectively (the Respondent has established an entitlement to the majority but not the entirety of the amount claimed), I do not propose to allow the respective filing costs.Orders Pursuant to s 137 of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld) it is ordered that the Residential Tenancies Authority pay the rental bond under rental bond number 700338412 in respect of the property at 2/132A Perth Street, South Toowoomba, Queensland as follows:(a)the amount of $1,419.00 to the Respondent; and(b)the balance to the Applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.