Zefi v The Director of Public Prosecutions; Jakaj v The Director of Public Prosecutions; Stakaj v The Director of Public Prosecutions; NH v The Director of Public Prosecutions

Case

[2016] HCATrans 65

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2016] HCATrans 065

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Adelaide  No A23 of 2015

B e t w e e n -

DAVID ZEFI

Applicant

and

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

Respondent

Office of the Registry
  Adelaide  No A24 of 2015

B e t w e e n -

RROK JAKAJ

Applicant

and

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

Respondent

Office of the Registry
  Adelaide  No A25 of 2015

B e t w e e n -

DARIO STAKAJ

Applicant

and

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

Respondent

Office of the Registry
  Adelaide  No A27 of 2015

B e t w e e n -

NH

Applicant

and

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

Respondent

KIEFEL J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT BRISBANE ON FRIDAY, 11 MARCH 2016, AT 9.30 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

____________________

KIEFEL J:   In these matters, Justice Keane and I are of the view that there should be grants of special leave.  The parties will be contacted with respect to an estimate of time for the hearing of these matters and the parties will be made aware of the directions necessary for the undertaking of the appeal.

AT 9.30 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Abuse of Process

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Stay of Proceedings

  • Jurisdiction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
High Court Bulletin [2016] HCAB 4

Cases Citing This Decision

4

High Court Bulletin [2016] HCAB 4
High Court Bulletin [2016] HCAB 3
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0