Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Yang v Blacktown City Council [2005] NSWLEC 282
PARTIES: APPLICANT
Eric YangRESPONDENT
Blacktown City CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 11371 of 2004
CORAM: Hoffman C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- Brothel -carparking - security measures - social and economic impacts - issues raised by objectors
LEGISLATION CITED: Blacktown Local Environmental Plan 1998
Blacktown Development Control Plan 1992CASES CITED: Parry Properties Pty Ltd v Ashfield Municipal Council No. 2 [2001] NSWLEC 62;
Venus Enterprises v Parramatta City Council, [1981] 43 LGERA 67;
Cartier Holdings Pty Ltd v Newcastle CC [2001] NSWLEC 70;
Martyn v Hornsby SC [2004] NSWLEC 614DATES OF HEARING: 07-08/03/20051 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 05/19/2005
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT
Mr R Creighton, agentRESPONDENT
Mr T O'Connor, solicitor
SOLICITORS
Houston Dearn O'Connor
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESHoffman C
19 May 2005
11371 of 2004 Eric Yang v Blacktown City Council
JUDGMENT
1 This is a class 1 appeal, No. 11371 of 2004 between Eric Yang and Blacktown Council in regard to refusal of a brothel in industrial unit Nos. 11 and 12 in an existing development at No. 12 Forge Street, Blacktown.
2 The applicant sought opening hours of seven days a week, 24 hours a day. The area is zoned 4(A) Industrial under the Blacktown Local Environmental Plan 1998. The use for a brothel is permissible with consent of the responsible authority. Part E of the Blacktown Development Control Plan 1992 stated controls on brothels in the industrial zone in Ch 6, Pt E. The Local Environmental Plan contains statutory provisions in cl 43(A).
3 The brothel occupies industrial units having direct street frontage with an entry door immediately beside a take-away food shop that services the industrial area. Outside the shop are some tables and chairs used by shop patrons whilst consuming food.
4 Just inside the front boundary through the drive entry gates to the shared carpark there are two roller doors to garages one in each of the brothel units. At the time of the on-site hearing one was fitted out as a CCTV security camera office, with TV screens, telephones, files and office furniture. The other roller door and garage was used for storage.
5 The two industrial bays had been joined by the opening of doorways through the fire separation walls. The customer service rooms had showers installed by breaking up the concrete slabs to lay pipes. There was cracking of the concrete masonry walls in places, both inside and outside. Air conditioning units have been installed on the roof and external flood lights installed in various places.
6 The secretary of the Owners Corporation of Strata Plan No. SP70989, the Industrial Bay Development of which the brothel was part, gave uncontested evidence that these works had been done without consent of the body corporate. The council indicated there was no council consents either.
7 At the rear of the brothel units was a shared carpark.…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Yang v Blacktown City Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2005] NSWLEC 282
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the proposed development did not make adequate provision for carparking, as only two carparks were available for a business requiring nine spaces. The court also found that the proposed security measures were not satisfactory, as the brothel's accesses were prominent and likely to cause offence to the surrounding community. Additionally, the court found that the location of the brothel was unsuitable, as its street entry was directly beside an existing shop and its customer tables and chairs, causing brothel clientele to interact with other owners, employees, and customers in the industrial development.
The court dismissed the appeal and refused consent for the proposed brothel, stating that the three determinative impacts of the brothel's operation, including offence to a considerable number of adjoining and adjacent business owners, their employees, their customers, and concern for minors either unaccompanied or accompanying adults, could not be ameliorated to acceptable levels through the proposed hours of operation and plan of management.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.