Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Wendy Wei v Holroyd City Council [2007] NSWLEC 163 PARTIES: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
Wendy Wei
Holroyd City CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 11031 of 2006 CORAM: Hussey C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Brothel, site suitability, security LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 1991CASES CITED: BGP Properties Pty Limited v Lake Macquarie City Council [2004] NSWLEC 399;
Martyn v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 614;
Yang v Blacktown City Council [2005] NSWLEC 282DATES OF HEARING: 28/03/2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
29 March 2007LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT
Mr C. Gough, solicitor
of Storey and GoughRESPONDENT
Mr G. McKee, solicitor
of McKee Solutions
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESHussey C
29 March 2007
JUDGMENT11031 of 2006 Wendy Wei v Holroyd City Council
Background.
1 This appeal concerns council's deemed refusal of a development application for internal alterations and additions to an existing industrial unit, which is situated at 1/181 McCredie Road, Guildford West, to enable its use as a brothel.
2 A number of issues were identified for the appeal, which can be summarised as follows:
- economic and social impacts, including the cost and difficulty of obtaining public liability insurance for the strata plan,
- possible adverse amenity impacts, due to the street frontage location of the subject property,
- matters raised by the objectors.
The site.
3 The subject land is described as Lot 3 in DP 733866 and is known has 181 McCredie Road, Guildford West. It has a street frontage of 29.8 m and total area of 2845 sq m.
4 Currently located on the site is a 2 storey industrial unit complex containing 4 units, ranging in floor area from 478 sq m to 483 sq m. The proposed development is to be located within Unit 1, which is located closest to McCredie Road. The existing operations within the complex include a cabinetmaker in Unit 2, an engineering company in Unit 3 and a software development company in Unit 4.
5 The unit complex is setback approximately 15 m from McCredie Road. Access to the property is via a 6 m concrete driveway aligning the eastern boundary. The portion of the site between the unit complex and the eastern boundary is paved for vehicular access, parking and manoeuvring.
6 The locality is predominantly industrial in character, and the surrounding development comprises factory unit complexes and industrial activities to the north, south, east and west. The nearest residential property is located approximately 450 m to the east of the site in Iris Street.
7 This proposal involves internal alterations to the ground floor of Unit 1, to create 3 workrooms with associated showers, exam room, waiting room and laundry room. No internal works are proposed for the first floor. The main features of the proposal are as follows:
- a maximum of 3 sex workers and 2 managers are to be employed and remain on the site during working hours,
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Wendy Wei v Holroyd City Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2007] NSWLEC 163
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the council's refusal of development consent was not in accordance with the law. The decision was not supported by the evidence, and the council had failed to properly consider the relevant planning instruments and the merits of the proposed development. The court held that the proposed use of the property as a brothel was not inherently incompatible with the surrounding area and that the council had not demonstrated that the refusal was necessary to protect the character of the area or to prevent undue harm to the environment. The court also found that the council had not properly considered the potential benefits of the proposed development, such as the economic benefits to the local community.
As a result of the court's decision, the appeal was upheld, and development consent was granted for the proposed change of use. The court made an order that the exhibits be returned, except for certain documents which were deemed irrelevant to the appeal. The court also imposed conditions on the development consent to ensure that the proposed use of the property as a brothel would not cause undue harm to the environment or the surrounding community.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The appeal is upheld.
2. Development consent is granted to DA 2007/105, for alterations to Unit 1, 181 McCredie Road, Guildford West to
enable each use as a brothel, subject to the conditions in
Annexure A.
3. The exhibits be returned except for 5, 6, 7, A, B and C.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.