Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wyong Shire Council v Australia Skydive Pty Ltd; Australia Skydive Pty Ltd v Wyong Shire Council; Australia Skydive Pty Ltd v Central Coast Aero Club Ltd [2014] NSWLEC 56 Hearing dates: 12 May 2014 Decision date: 12 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Craig J Decision: 1.Order that Australia Skydive Pty Ltd produce the documents identified in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the Council's Notice to Produce filed on 13 March 2014.
2.Dismiss the Notice of Motion filed by Australia Skydive Pty Ltd on 3 April 2014 seeking to have its Class 1 proceedings 14/10059 heard together with the Class 4 proceedings 13/40934 and 14/40065.
3.Costs of the respective Notices of Motion to be costs in the proceedings.
4.Orders in accordance with the Short Minutes of Order initialled by his Honour and placed with the papers.
5.Note the proceedings are next listed for directions before Craig J at 9.30 am on Wednesday 25 June 2014.
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - motion to set aside a notice to produce - notice issued under r 34.1 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) - whether documents sought in notice were relevant to or had any bearing upon the issues in the proceedings - whether premature to require production of documents - motion granted in part Legislation Cited: Air Navigation Act 1938 (NSW)
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
Commonwealth Constitution
Crown Lands Act 1989 (NSW)
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW)
Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)Cases Cited: Norris v Kandiah [2007] NSWSC 1296
Patonga Beach Holdings Pty Ltd v Lyons [2009] NSWSC 869
Penrith Rugby League Club Pty Ltd v Brown [2004] NSWSC 1182
Southern Pacific Hotel Services Inc v Southern Pacific Hotel Corporation Ltd [1984] 1 NSWLR 710Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: 13/40934
Wyong Shire Council (Applicant)
Australia Skydive Pty Limited (First respondent)
Tuggerah Lake Reserve Trust (Second respondent)14/10059
14/40065
Australia Skydive Pty Limited (Applicant)
Wyong Shire Council (Respondent)
Australia Skydive Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Central Coast Aero Club Limited (First respondent)
Wyong Shire Council (Second respondent)Representation: 13/40934
P W Larkin SC with L Thomas (Applicant)
M Astill (First respondent)
F Berglund (Second respondent)14/10059
M Astill (Applicant)
P W Larkin SC with L Thomas (Respondent)14/40065
M Astill (Applicant)
Dilworth (First respondent)
P W Larkin SC with L Thomas (Second respondent)
13/40934
Wyong Shire Council (Applicant)
Maddocks Lawyers (First respondent)
McCabes Lawyers(Second respondent)14/10059
14/40065
Maddocks Lawyers (Applicant)
Wyong Shire Council (Respondent)
Maddocks Lawyers (Applicant)
Peter Hudson Solicitors (First respondent)
Wyong Shire Council (Second respondent)
File Number(s): 40934 of 2013 10059 of 2014 40065 of 2014
ex tempore Judgment
Adjacent to the shore of Tuggerah Lake on the Central Coast of New South Wales is a large area of land formerly known as the Pioneer Dairy and now a reserve under the Crown Lands Act1989 (NSW) (the Reserve). That Reserve is under…
Continue reading Wyong Shire Council v Australia Skydive Pty Ltd; Australia S...
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Wyong Shire Council v Australia Skydive Pty Ltd; Australia Skydive Pty Ltd v Wyong Shire Council; Australia Skydive Pty Ltd v Central Coast Aero Club Ltd [2014] NSWLEC 56
- Case
- [2014] NSWLEC 56
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether Australia Skydive Pty Ltd should be compelled to produce specific documents as required by the Wyong Shire Council's Notice to Produce and whether the legal proceedings initiated by Australia Skydive Pty Ltd should be consolidated with other proceedings. The court needed to determine if the documents were relevant to the case and if consolidating the proceedings would be in the interest of justice and efficiency.
The court ruled that Australia Skydive Pty Ltd must produce the documents identified in the Notice to Produce. The court found that the documents were relevant to the case and their production was necessary for the fair administration of justice. Regarding the consolidation of proceedings, the court dismissed the application by Australia Skydive Pty Ltd. The court held that consolidating the proceedings would not serve the interests of justice and efficiency, and therefore, the proceedings should remain separate.
The final orders of the court included compelling Australia Skydive Pty Ltd to produce the specified documents, dismissing the application to consolidate the proceedings, and setting costs for the respective notices of motion. The proceedings were scheduled for further directions before Craig J. The orders were to be recorded in accordance with the Short Minutes of Order and the case was set to be next listed for directions on 25 June 2014.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.Order that Australia Skydive Pty Ltd produce the documents identified in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the Council's Notice to Produce filed on 13 March 2014.
2.Dismiss the Notice of Motion filed by Australia Skydive Pty Ltd on 3 April 2014 seeking to have its Class 1 proceedings 14/10059 heard together with the Class 4 proceedings 13/40934 and 14/40065.
3.Costs of the respective Notices of Motion to be costs in the proceedings.
4.Orders in accordance with the Short Minutes of Order initialled by his Honour and placed with the papers.
5.Note the proceedings are next listed for directions before Craig J at 9.30 am on Wednesday 25 June 2014.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.