Woodford v Westpac Group

Link copied
Case Copied 17 min read
CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER 

CITATION:

Woodford v Westpac Group [2021] NSWPIC 461

APPLICANT: Christine Woodford
RESPONDENT: Westpac Group
MEMBER: Cameron Burge
DATE OF DECISION: 16 November 2021
CATCHWORDS:

WORKERS COMPENSATION -   Claim for weekly and permanent impairment compensation and medical expenses regarding alleged psychological injury; applicant employed as customer service officer in bank and subjected to repeated interactions with aggressive and violent customer over 12 months, and other work-related problems; respondent denies injury and alleges if there was a work-related injury it was wholly or predominantly caused by its reasonable actions with respect to promotion of the applicant’s co-worker within the branch; Held - applicant suffered work-related psychological injury; the causes of the injury were multi-factorial, not wholly or predominantly the promotion of the applicant’s co-worker; respondent to pay the applicant weekly compensation as set out in the Certificate of Determination; claim for permanent impairment compensation remitted to President for referral to a Medical Assessor; respondent to pay the applicant’s reasonably necessary medical and treatment expenses.

DETERMINATIONS MADE:

1.    Leave is granted to the applicant to amend the Application to Resolve a Dispute to plead a claim for weekly benefits from 1 September 2021 to date and continuing.

2.    The applicant suffered an injury in the course of her employment with the respondent, with a deemed date of injury of 31 May 2019.

3.    The injury referred to in (2) above is not wholly or predominantly caused by the reasonable actions of the respondent with respect to performance appraisal or promotion.

4.    At the date of injury, the applicant's preinjury average weekly earnings were $1,265.53 per week.

5.    Since 1 September 2021, the applicant has been and remains totally incapacitated for employment.

6. The respondent is to pay the applicant weekly compensation pursuant to section 37 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 at the rate of $1,012.26 per week.

7. The respondent is to pay the applicant’s reasonable and necessary medical and treatment expenses pursuant to section 60 to the Workers Compensation Act 1987.

8.    The claim for permanent impairment compensation is remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor to determine the whole person impairment arising from the following:

Date of injury:                  31 May 2019 (deemed).

Body systems referred:      psychological/psychiatric injury.

Method of assessment:   whole person impairment.

9.    The documents to be referred to the Medical Assessor to assist with their determination are to include the following:

(a)    this Certificate of Determination and Statement of Reasons;

(b)    Application to Resolve a Dispute and attachments;

(c)    Reply and attachments, and

(d)    respondent's Application to Admit Late Documents dated 3 September 2021.

STATEMENT OF REASONS

BACKGROUND

Christine Woodford (the applicant) worked for Westpac Group (the respondent) under the St George brand as a customer service specialist, having started working with St George Building Society in 1984. She left that employment in or about 1990 and returned to employment with the Westpac Group in March 2004, working as a casual customer service officer based at Nelson Bay. She…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Woodford v Westpac Group and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWPIC 461
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Woodford v Westpac Group involved the applicant, Woodford, who sought compensation for weekly and permanent impairment, along with medical expenses, due to an alleged psychological injury sustained during his employment as a customer service officer with the respondent, Westpac Group. Woodford claimed that he was subjected to repeated interactions with an aggressive and violent customer over a 12-month period, as well as other work-related problems, leading to his psychological injury. Westpac Group denied that Woodford had suffered a work-related injury and argued that if any injury did occur, it was wholly or predominantly caused by its reasonable actions in promoting one of Woodford's co-workers within the branch.

The legal issues before the court included whether Woodford had indeed suffered a work-related psychological injury, and if so, what were the causes of that injury. The court had to determine whether the injury was caused by the alleged work-related stressors or if it was predominantly due to the promotion of Woodford's co-worker, as argued by Westpac Group. The court also had to decide on the appropriate compensation payable to Woodford for his injuries.

In its decision, the court found that Woodford had suffered a work-related psychological injury. The court held that the causes of the injury were multi-factorial and not wholly or predominantly attributable to the promotion of Woodford's co-worker. Consequently, the court ordered Westpac Group to pay Woodford weekly compensation as set out in the Certificate of Determination. The claim for permanent impairment compensation was remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor. Furthermore, the court ordered Westpac Group to pay Woodford's reasonably necessary medical and treatment expenses related to his psychological injury.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.