Winslow Constructors v Head, Transport for Victoria

Link copied
Case Copied 67 min read
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA Not Restricted

AT MELBOURNE
COMMERCIAL COURT
ARBITRATION LIST

S ECI 2020 02720

WINSLOW CONSTRUCTORS PTY LTD (ACN 006 581 764) Applicant
v 
HEAD, TRANSPORT FOR VICTORIA (ABN 97 481 088 949) Respondent

---

JUDGE:

RIORDAN J

WHERE HELD:

Melbourne

DATES OF HEARING:

21 and 22 September 2020

DATE OF JUDGMENT:

2 December 2020

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

Winslow Constructors v Head, Transport for Victoria

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2020] VSC 790

---

ARBITRATION – Application to enforce awards – Whether award stated reasons on which it was based as required by s 31(3) of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic) (‘the Act’) – Nature of the obligation with respect to reasons imposed by the Act considered.

ARBITRATION – Waiver – Elements of waiver under s 4 of the Act considered – Whether conduct constituting waiver must precede the challenged award – Whether party waived objection to alleged inadequacy of reasons in award by failing to object until after further awards relating to costs and other matters.

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Applicant Mr H Foxcroft QC with
Mr T J Mullen
Giannakopoulos Solicitors
For the Respondent Mr M R Scott QC with
Ms E Levine
Maddocks

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Background......................................................................................................................................... 1

The Contract........................................................................................................................................ 8

Relevant statutory provisions........................................................................................................ 11

Issues for determination................................................................................................................. 15

What obligation with respect to reasons is imposed by s 31(3) of the Act?.......................... 15

Submissions................................................................................................................................. 15

The Department’s submissions....................................................................................... 15

Winslow’s submissions..................................................................................................... 16

Conclusion.................................................................................................................................... 17

Does the Second Award state the reasons upon which it is based as required by s 31(3) of the Act?........................................................................................................................................................ 20

Summary of the relevant parts of the Second Award........................................................... 20

Claims for EOTs during periods of adverse weather, suspensions and shutdowns.......... 26

Submissions................................................................................................................................. 29

The Department’s submissions....................................................................................... 29

Winslow’s submissions..................................................................................................... 30

Consideration.............................................................................................................................. 31

Conclusion on individual EOTs and Variation No. 6............................................................... 32

Has the Department waived its right to object under s 4 of the Act?.................................... 33

Submissions................................................................................................................................. 34

Winslow’s submissions..................................................................................................... 34

The Department’s submissions....................................................................................... 36

Conclusion.................................................................................................................................... 37

The parties may derogate from s 31(3) of the Act......................................................... 37

The Department knew of the alleged non-compliance................................................ 38

The Department unduly delayed in stating its objection............................................ 38

Orders................................................................................................................................................. 41

Annexure A....................................................................................................................................... 42

Window 4........................................................................................................................................... 42

EOT 9............................................................................................................................................. 42

EOT 13........................................................................................................................................... 44

EOT 14........................................................................................................................................... 45

EOT 15........................................................................................................................................... 46

EOT 16........................................................................................................................................... 47

EOT 18........................................................................................................................................... 49

EOT 19........................................................................................................................................... 50

EOT 20........................................................................................................................................... 51

EOT 21........................................................................................................................................... 52

EOT 28........................................................................................................................................... 53

EOT 33........................................................................................................................................... 55

EOT 34........................................................................................................................................... 56

Window 5......................................................................................................................................... 57

EOT 22........................................................................................................................................... 57

EOT 26........................................................................................................................................... 58

Window 6......................................................................................................................................... 59

EOT 27........................................................................................................................................... 59

EOT 29........................................................................................................................................... 61

EOT 35........................................................................................................................................... 62

Variation No. 6.................................................................................................................................. 62

HIS HONOUR:

  1. By originating application to enforce an award filed 26 June 2020, the applicant (‘Winslow’)[1] seeks:

    [1]On occasion the initials ‘WC’ appear in quotations. For the avoidance of doubt, WC is a reference to Winslow.

1.an order under section 35 of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 that the following awards be enforced:

(a)the Second Partial Final Award dated 7 April 2020, further or alternatively, the Third Partial Final…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Winslow Constructors v Head, Transport for Victoria and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] VSC 790
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Winslow Constructors brought an application to the Supreme Court of Victoria to enforce an arbitration award made in their favour against Head, Transport for Victoria. The dispute centred on whether the award complied with the statutory requirement under section 31(3) of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic) to state the reasons on which it was based. Winslow Constructors argued that the award did not sufficiently state its reasons, while Head, Transport for Victoria contended that the award was adequate and that any deficiencies were waived by their conduct.

The court had to determine whether the award was compliant with the statutory requirement to provide reasons, considering the nature of the obligation imposed by the Act. The court also examined whether Head, Transport for Victoria waived any objection to the adequacy of the reasons by failing to raise the issue until after further awards had been made relating to costs and other matters. The court needed to consider the elements of waiver under section 4 of the Act and whether such conduct could constitute a waiver of an objection to the reasons provided in the award.

The court held that the award did not adequately state the reasons on which it was based, and thus did not comply with the statutory requirement. However, the court found that Head, Transport for Victoria waived any objection to the adequacy of the reasons by failing to raise the issue until after further awards were made. The court determined that the failure to object to the reasons until after the subsequent awards constituted a waiver of the objection. Consequently, the court dismissed the application to enforce the award, as the waiver by Head, Transport for Victoria precluded them from challenging the adequacy of the reasons.

The court ordered that the application to enforce the award be dismissed. The court did not make any orders regarding costs, finding that the waiver effectively precluded Winslow Constructors from obtaining an order for costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.