Wilma Freddie and Others on behalf of Wiluna/Galaxy Resources Ltd/Western Australia

Case

[2006] NNTTA 49

1 May 2006


NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL

Wilma Freddie and Others on behalf of Wiluna/Galaxy Resources Ltd/Western Australia, [2006] NNTTA 49 (1 May 2006)

Application No:         WF06/12

IN THE MATTER of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)

- and -

IN THE MATTER of an inquiry into a Future Act Determination Application

Wilma Freddie and Others on behalf of Wiluna (WC99/24) (Applicant/native title party)

- and -

Murchison Resources Pty Ltd (grantee party)

- and -

The State of Western Australia (Government party)

FUTURE ACT DETERMINATION

Tribunal:  Hon C J Sumner, Deputy President

Place:  Perth
Date:  1 May 2006

Catchwords:  Native title – future act – application for determination for the grant of prospecting licences – named applicants not signed state deed – logistical difficulties – Regional Standard Heritage Agreement executed by grantee party – native title party consents to the determination – consent determination that the acts may be done.

Legislation:  Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), ss 35, 38, 109

Cases:Monkey Mia Dolphin Resort Pty Ltd v Western Australia [2001] NNTTA 50; (2001) 164 FLR 361

Wilma Freddie and Others on behalf of Wiluna/Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd/ Western Australia, NNTT WF05/3, WF05/4, WF05/5, [2005] NNTTA 47 (14 July 2005), Hon C J Sumner

Wilma Freddie and Others on behalf of Wiluna/Galaxy Resources Ltd/Western Australia, NNTT WF06/11, [2006] NNTTA 48 (1 May 2006) Hon C J Sumner

Hearing date:  1 May 2006

Counsel for the  Mr Malcolm O'Dell
native title party:                  Ngaanyatjarra Council (Aboriginal Corporation)

Solicitor for the  Ms Jasmine Campbell
native title party:                  Ngaanyatjarra Council (Aboriginal Corporation)

Representative of the          
grantee party:  Mr Nicholas Powrie, Tenement Administration Services

Representatives of the        Mr Rod Wahl, State Solicitor’s Office
Government party:               Ms Janice Goodwin, Department of Industry and Resources


REASONS FOR FUTURE ACT DETERMINATION

  1. On 27 November 2002, the Government party gave notice under s 29 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (‘the Act’) of future acts, namely the grant of prospecting licences P53/1143 and P53/1144 (‘the proposed licences’) under the Mining Act 1978 (WA) to Murchison Resources Pty Ltd (‘the grantee party’) and included in the notice a statement that the Government party considered that the grant attracted the expedited procedure.

  2. The area, location and percentage to which the proposed licences overlap the Wiluna  registered native title claim (WC99/24, registered from 24 September 1999) is as follows:

  • P53/1143-4 – 276.21 hectares (respectively 138.08 and 138.13 hectares), 75 kilometres north easterly of Wiluna in the Shire of Wiluna, 100% overlap.

  1. The native title party with respect to these proceedings is Wilma Freddie & Others on behalf of Wiluna (WC99/24).

  2. On 25 August 2003 the Tribunal made a consent determination in relation to expedited procedure objection application WO03/95 that the expedited procedure was not attracted which meant that the normal negotiation procedure provided for in s 31 of the Act applied from this date.

  3. On 11 April 2006, being a date more than six months after the s 29 notices were given, the Ngaanyatjarra Council (Aboriginal Corporation) made an application pursuant to s 35 of the Act for a future act determination under s 38 on behalf of the native title party.

  4. The native title party requested that the future act determination be made by consent and appended to the application a minute of a consent determination in the following terms, which has since been executed in counterparts by Mr Malcolm O'Dell on behalf of the native title party, Mr Nicholas Powrie on behalf of the grantee party, and Mr Rob Wahl on behalf of the Government party:

‘CONSENT DETERMINATION UNDER SECTION 38 OF

THE NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 (CTH)

  1. The Government Party has complied with the requirements of s.31(1)(a) of the Native Title Act 1993.

  2. The Government Party, the Native Title Party and the Grantee Party has complied with the requirements of s.31(1)(b) of the Native Title Act 1993.

  3. The Government Party, the Native Title Party and the Grantee Party consents to a determination under s.38 of the Native Title Act 1993 that the ‘act’ being the grant of Prospecting Licences P53/1143 and P53/1144 may be done.’

  4. The Tribunal has power to make a determination with the consent of the parties and it will normally be appropriate to do so where the parties (and particularly the native title party) are legally represented and those representatives have advised the Tribunal of the consent.  The Tribunal will hear the parties to satisfy itself that the consent determination is appropriate (Monkey Mia Dolphin Resort Pty Ltd v Western Australia [2001] NNTTA 50; (2001) 164 FLR 361).

  5. The reasons for seeking a consent determination set out in para 10 of the application are the same as those considered in Wilma Freddie and Others on behalf of Wiluna/Galaxy Resources Ltd/Western Australia, NNTT WF06/11, [2006] NNTTA 48 (1 May 2006), Hon C J Sumner (at para [8]), also involving the same native title party, namely the logistical difficulties in obtaining signatures of all named applicants.

The inquiry

  1. On 1 May 2006, the Tribunal conducted a hearing.  All parties confirmed their consent to the determination in the terms sought.  Mr Malcolm O'Dell, counsel for the native title party, advised he was satisfied that the facts set out in para 10 of the application were correct and that Ngaanyatjarra Council had been properly instructed by the native title party to consent to the determination.  He also informed the Tribunal that the agreement signed by the grantee party is based on the Regional Standard Heritage Agreement for exploration endorsed by Ngaanyatjarra Council, the Government party and industry.

  2. The Tribunal has previously accepted the logistical difficulties in obtaining signatures of the Wiluna applicants to a State Deed (i.e. a s 31(1)(b) agreement), referred to in para 10 of the application, as a legitimate basis for seeking a consent determination (see for example Wilma Freddie and Others on behalf of Wiluna/Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd/ Western Australia, NNTT WF05/3, WF05/4, WF05/5, [2005] NNTTA 47 (14 July 2005), Hon C J Sumner. I adopt the findings from para [10] of that determination in relation to the responsibilities of the Ngaanyatjarra Council as a representative body and the manner in which the Tribunal is to carry out its functions under s 109 of the Act.

Determination

  1. By consent the determination of the Tribunal is that the act, namely the grant of prospecting licences P53/1143 and P53/1144 to Murchison Resources Pty Ltd, may be done.

Hon C J Sumner
Deputy President

1 May 2006