Williams v Sutherland Shire Council

Link copied
Case Copied 52 min read
CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER 

Citation:

Williams v Sutherland Shire Council [2022] NSWPIC 498

APPLICANT: Jeffrey David Williams
RESPONDENT: Sutherland Shire Council
PRINCIPAL Member: Josephine Bamber
DATE OF DECISION: 7 September 2022
CATCHWORDS:

WORKERS COMPENSATION - Claim for weekly compensation in relation to the applicant’s left knee involving consideration as to whether injuries before and after 30 June 1985 contributed to incapacity for employment in period 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017; Held – the applicant sustained a personal injury to his left knee on 10 June 1979 which has caused incapacity for employment in the period 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017; the applicant also sustained an injury under section 4(b)(ii) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (1987 Act) as a result of the aggravation of the disease in the left knee with the deemed date of injury of 29 August 2006 which has caused incapacity for employment in the period 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017; the respondent is liable to pay the applicant weekly compensation in the period 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017 at the rate of $478 per week; pursuant to section 22 of the 1987 Act there is to be an apportionment of the respondent’s liability in the amount of 50% in respect of the injury on 10 June 1979 and 50% in respect of the disease injury; pursuant to section 22A (5)(b) of the 1987 Act the respondent in the interest of the self-insurer is to pay to the applicant weekly compensation in the period 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017 at the rate of $478 per week; pursuant to section 22A(4) of the 1987 Act the respondent in the interests of IGF is to pay to the self-insurer 50% of the award of weekly compensation; there is to be an award for the respondent in the interests of its insurers AAI Limited t/as GIO, Allianz Australia Ltd and Employers Mutual Limited.

determinations made:

1.     The applicant sustained a personal injury to his left knee on 10 June 1979 which has caused incapacity for employment in the period 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017.

2. The applicant also sustained an injury under s 4(b)(ii) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 as a result of the aggravation of the disease in the left knee, with the deemed date of injury of 29 August 2006, which has caused incapacity for employment in the period 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017.

3.     The respondent is liable to pay the applicant weekly compensation in the period 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017 at the rate of $478 per week.

4. Pursuant to s 22 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 there is to be an apportionment of the respondent’s liability in the amount of 50% in respect of the injury on 10 June 1979 and 50% in respect of the disease injury.

5. Pursuant to s 22A (5)(b) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 the respondent in the interest…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Williams v Sutherland Shire Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2022] NSWPIC 498
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Williams v Sutherland Shire Council involved a dispute regarding workers' compensation for injuries sustained by the applicant, Williams. Williams sought compensation for his left knee injuries, focusing on the period from 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017. The Sutherland Shire Council, as the employer, contested the claim, arguing that the injuries did not qualify for compensation or that any compensation should be apportioned differently. The court was tasked with determining whether Williams' injuries, both those incurred before and after 30 June 1985, contributed to his incapacity for work during the specified period.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether Williams' left knee injuries, which dated back to 10 June 1979, and the aggravation of a disease in the left knee on 29 August 2006, qualified as compensable injuries under the Workers Compensation Act 1987. Specifically, the court had to ascertain whether these injuries contributed to Williams' incapacity for employment from 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017, and if so, how liability should be apportioned among the employer, the self-insurer, and other insurers. The court also needed to determine the appropriate weekly compensation rate and whether the employer's liability should be apportioned between the initial injury and the aggravation of the disease.

The court found that Williams had sustained a personal injury to his left knee on 10 June 1979, which caused incapacity for employment from 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017. Additionally, it was determined that Williams had suffered an injury due to the aggravation of the disease in his left knee on 29 August 2006, also causing incapacity for employment during the same period. The court ruled that the Sutherland Shire Council was liable for weekly compensation at the rate of $478 per week. The court ordered an apportionment of the Council's liability, with 50% attributable to the initial injury on 10 June 1979 and 50% to the disease injury on 29 August 2006. Furthermore, the court mandated that the Council, in the interests of the self-insurer, pay weekly compensation, and in the interests of its insurers, it was required to pay 50% of the award of weekly compensation.

The court also made specific orders for the Sutherland Shire Council to pay Williams weekly compensation at the rate of $478 per week for the period from 3 November 2017 to 26 December 2017. The Council was required to pay 50% of this compensation in the interest of the self-insurer, and 50% of the weekly compensation was to be paid by the Council to its insurers, AAI Limited t/as GIO, Allianz Australia Ltd, and Employers Mutual Limited. These orders were made pursuant to sections 22, 22A(4), and 22A(5)(b) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.