Wijanto v Metcash Trading Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 78 min read
CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER 

CITATION:

Wijanto v Metcash Trading Ltd [2021] NSWPIC 345

APPLICANT: Jessie Wijanto
RESPONDENT: Metcash Trading Ltd
MEMBER: Kerry Haddock
DATE OF DECISION: 13 September 2021
CATCHWORDS:

WORKERS COMPENSATION - Claim for weekly benefits, medical expenses, permanent impairment compensation and interest on weekly benefits as a result of psychological injury; respondent relied on section 11A of the Workers Compensation Act 1987, being actions with respect to retrenchment or dismissal; applicant accepted redundancy while on maternity leave that had commenced 12 months before; dispute as to main contributing factor; incapacity, including effect of applicant’s maternity leave; claim that respondent contravened sections 278 and 283 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (1998 Act), but no submissions by applicant on this issue; application of AV v AW, Ponnan v George Weston Foods Ltd, Miller v NSW Police Service (No 2), Haidary v Wandella Pet Foods Pty Limited, Dynamix Pty Ltd and Burragong Pet Foods Pty Ltd, and Kaur v Thales Underwater Systems Pty Ltd; Held - employment was main contributing factor to disease injury; the applicant’s injury was not wholly or predominantly caused by the respondent’s actions with respect to retrenchment or dismissal, which were in any event not reasonable; the applicant has had capacity for work since 27 July 2020, working in family business; the applicant’s entitlement to weekly benefits is not affected by maternity leave; award for the applicant for weekly benefits and medical expenses; claim for interest on weekly benefits declined as not possible to ascertain when claim duly made; the respondent did not contravene sections 278 and 283 of the 1998 Act; claim for permanent impairment compensation remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor.

DETERMINATIONS MADE:

1.    That there is an award for the applicant of weekly benefits as follows:

(a) $1,759.87 per week from 4 February 2019 to 6 May 2019, pursuant to section 36 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987;

(b) $1,482 per week from 7 May 2019 to 26 July 2020, pursuant to section 37 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987;

(c) $1,164.56 per week from 27 July 2020 to 30 June 2021, pursuant to section 37 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987, and

(d) $1,156.72 per week from 1 July 2021, pursuant to section 37 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987.

2.    That the respondent is to have credit for weekly benefits paid.

3. That the application for interest on the award of weekly benefits, pursuant to section 109 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 is refused.

4. That there is an award for the applicant pursuant to section 60 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987.

5.    That the claim for permanent impairment is remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor for assessment of permanent impairment as a result of psychiatric/psychological injury deemed to have occurred on 4 February 2019.

6.    That the Medical Assessor is to be provided with the following:

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Wijanto v Metcash Trading Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWPIC 345
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Wijanto v Metcash Trading Ltd, the applicant, Wijanto, sought compensation for weekly benefits, medical expenses, permanent impairment compensation, and interest on weekly benefits due to a psychological injury. The respondent, Metcash Trading Ltd, defended the claim by invoking section 11A of the Workers Compensation Act 1987, which pertains to actions related to retrenchment or dismissal. Wijanto had accepted redundancy while on maternity leave, which began 12 months prior. The primary dispute centred on the main contributing factor to Wijanto's injury and the impact of her maternity leave on her entitlement to compensation.

The court was required to determine whether employment was the primary factor contributing to Wijanto's psychological injury and whether her entitlement to weekly benefits was affected by her maternity leave. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether Metcash Trading Ltd contravened sections 278 and 283 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998. The applicant did not provide submissions on this latter issue. The court considered precedents such as AV v AW, Ponnan v George Weston Foods Ltd, Miller v NSW Police Service (No 2), Haidary v Wandella Pet Foods Pty Limited, Dynamix Pty Ltd and Burragong Pet Foods Pty Ltd, and Kaur v Thales Underwater Systems Pty Ltd in reaching its decision.

The court held that employment was the main contributing factor to Wijanto's disease injury, but the respondent's actions regarding retrenchment or dismissal were not the primary cause, nor were they reasonable. Wijanto had been capable of working since 27 July 2020, evidenced by her employment in a family business. The court also determined that Wijanto's maternity leave did not affect her entitlement to weekly benefits. Wijanto was awarded compensation for weekly benefits and medical expenses, but the claim for interest on weekly benefits was declined due to the inability to ascertain when the claim was duly made. The court found no contravention of sections 278 and 283 of the 1998 Act by Metcash Trading Ltd. The claim for permanent impairment compensation was remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.