DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Whittaker v Simpson [2014] QDC 289
PARTIES:
MARK ALAN WHITTAKER
(appellant)
v
CHRISTIAN TIMOTHY SIMPSON
(respondent)FILE NO/S:
APPEAL NO: D75/2014
DIVISION:
Appellate
PROCEEDING:
Appeal
ORIGINATING COURT:
Magistrates Court, Cairns
DELIVERED ON:
17 December 2014
DELIVERED AT:
Cairns
HEARING DATE:
14 November 2014
JUDGE:
MORZONE QC DCJ
ORDER:
1. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS:
CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - 8 counts of failing to give to the Commissioner of Taxation income tax returns for eight financial years when required to do so under the taxation law – mode of hearing of appeal – particulars of complaint – disclosure – elements of offence - whether a “person” within the meaning of s 162 Income Tax Assessment Act – purported withdrawal of authority to use of tax file number – “in the approved form” – conviction
Legislation
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 162
Justices Act 1886 (Qld) s 222, s 223(1), 227
Taxation Administration Act 1958 (Cth), s 8C(1)
Cases
R v Rollason & Jenkins, ex parte A-G (Qld) [2007] QCA 65COUNSEL:
Appellant appeared in person
Mr G Lynham for the Respondent
SOLICITORS:
The Office of The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions for the respondent
On 3 April 2014, after a summary trial in the Magistrates Court held in Cairns, the appellant was convicted of eight charges under s 8C(1)(a) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (“TAA”) relating to his failure to give to the Commissioner of Taxation income tax returns for eight financial years.
The appellant now appeals his convictions.
The appellant was self-represented at the appeal hearing. Both parties provided outlines of argument, and made further submissions on the hearing of the appeal.
Background
On 15 June 2012, the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation issued to the appellant a final notice under s 162 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ("ITAA"), which required the appellant to furnish to the Commissioner of Taxation income tax returns for the eight financial years ending 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 by 10 August 2012.
The appellant was charged with eight offences contrary to s 8C(1)(a) TAA relating to his failure to give to the Commissioner of Taxation income tax returns for the financial years ending 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010.
The appellant pleaded not guilty to all eight charges, and the matter proceeded by way of summary hearing on 19 March 2014. The appellant elected to testify and was cross-examined. During the hearing, the appellant admitted that he received the final notice[1] and that he did not lodge any of the income tax returns alleged in each of the eight charges.[2] These were not disputed on appeal.
[1]T.1-95 ll.27-29; T.107
[2]T.101 ll.44-46; T.105 l.37 – T.106 l.14
The prosecution case against the appellant was that:
1. The final notice was valid;
2. The appellant received the final notice;
3. The appellant failed to comply with the final notice in that he did not furnish the income tax…
Continue reading Whittaker v Simpson
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Whittaker v Simpson [2014] QDC 289
- Case
- [2014] QDC 289
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court held that the appellant was indeed a "person" within the meaning of section 162 of the Income Tax Assessment Act. It was established that the appellant had failed to give the Commissioner of Taxation income tax returns for the relevant financial years. The court found that the appellant's argument that he had withdrawn his authority for the use of his tax file number was without merit. The court was satisfied that the appellant was required to give the Commissioner of Taxation income tax returns for the relevant financial years. The mode of hearing of the appeal and the particulars of complaint were also considered, and the court found that the disclosure was adequate for the purposes of the appeal. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, and the conviction upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Appeal dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.