Whiteman v Yates

Case [2024] QCATA 26


QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


CITATION:

Whiteman v Yates [2024] QCATA 26

PARTIES:

KATRINA WHITEMAN

(applicant)

v

ANDREA DANJELO YATES

(respondent)

APPLICATION NO/S:

APL152-22

ORIGINATING APPLICATION NO/S:

MCDT 292/22

MATTER TYPE:

Appeals

DELIVERED ON:

4 January 2024

HEARING DATE:

9 May 2023

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Member Carrigan

ORDERS:

1.     The Tribunal orders that the application filed in the Tribunal by the Applicant on 31 May 2022 for leave to appeal or appeal is dismissed.

2.     In the event that any party to the proceedings seeks an order for costs, then that party is to file in the Tribunal two (2) copies and is to give to the other party one (one) copy of its submissions on costs including submissions relating to:

(a) the various matters in s 102 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld);

(b)     specifying the quantum of costs claimed and the way in which those costs have been calculated, including itemising all costs and saying in respect of each cost item how or why that cost was incurred, the nature of the cost incurred including any rate or scale applicable to the calculation on that cost;

(c)     a copy of any retainer or cost agreement relevant to the claim of costs; and

(d)     any other matters relevant to the claim for costs on or before 4.00 pm on Friday, 19 January 2024;

3.     Any party who receives submissions on costs from the other party may file in the Tribunal two (2) copies and is to give to the other party one (1) copy of their submissions, if any, in reply to the other party’s submissions on all before 4.00 pm on Friday, 9 February 2024;

4. Unless any party files in the Tribunal, and gives to the other party, by 4.00 pm on Friday 9 February 2024 a written request for an oral hearing of any application for costs, the Tribunal will determine the cost issue on the submissions filed by the parties, or either of them, pursuant to section 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) without an oral hearing.

5.     If neither party files in the Tribunal submissions on costs on or before 4.00 pm on Friday, 9 February 2024 then each party to the proceedings must bear that party’s own costs for the proceeding.

6.     The parties have liberty to apply to the Tribunal on fourteen (14) days written notice to the other party in respect for any further order or direction in respect of orders 1 to 4 (inclusive) above.

CATCHWORDS:

APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – RIGHT OF APPEAL – WHEN APPEAL LIES – RESIDENTIAL TENANCY – where dispute about whether the landlord was represented in Tribunal Hearing – whether landlord represented by agent – whether leave given to the agent to represent the landlord – whether Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the dispute – whether the Tribunal erred in fact and in the local – whether the Tribunal…

Continue reading Whiteman v Yates

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Whiteman v Yates [2024] QCATA 26
Case
[2024] QCATA 26
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter in Whiteman v Yates was before the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal, where the dispute centred on the representation of a landlord in a residential tenancy matter. The Applicant contested whether the landlord had been properly represented by an agent in the original Tribunal hearing and questioned the Tribunal's jurisdiction to hear the dispute, particularly regarding the agent's authority to represent the landlord. The Applicant also challenged the Tribunal's factual and legal assessments, as well as the compensation awarded.

The court was required to determine if the landlord was indeed represented by an agent during the Tribunal hearing, whether the agent had been granted leave to represent the landlord, and if the Tribunal had the necessary jurisdiction to hear the dispute. Furthermore, the court had to consider whether the Tribunal made any errors in fact or law and whether the compensation assessment was appropriate. These legal issues were pivotal in resolving the case.

The Tribunal dismissed the Applicant's application for leave to appeal, finding that the landlord had been adequately represented by an agent with proper authorisation. The Tribunal confirmed its jurisdiction over the dispute and found no errors in its factual or legal assessments. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the original decision regarding compensation. This comprehensive decision provided clarity on the representation issue, jurisdictional scope, and the accuracy of the Tribunal's assessments.

The Tribunal ordered that the application for leave to appeal or an appeal filed by the Applicant on 31 May 2022 be dismissed. Additionally, the Tribunal stipulated a procedure for the parties to follow if they wished to seek costs, including detailed submissions and a timeline for filing these submissions. The Tribunal also outlined the process for determining the cost issue and the consequences if no submissions were filed. The parties were granted liberty to apply for further orders or directions if necessary.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The Tribunal orders that the application filed in the Tribunal by the Applicant on 31 May 2022 for leave to appeal or appeal is dismissed.

2. In the event that any party to the proceedings seeks an order for costs, then that party is to file in the Tribunal two (2) copies and is to give to the other party one (one) copy of its submissions on costs including submissions relating to:

(a) the various matters in s 102 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld);

(b) specifying the quantum of costs claimed and the way in which those costs have been calculated, including itemising all costs and saying in respect of each cost item how or why that cost was incurred, the nature of the cost incurred including any rate or scale applicable to the calculation on that cost;

(c) a copy of any retainer or cost agreement relevant to the claim of costs; and

(d) any other matters relevant to the claim for costs on or before 4.00 pm on Friday, 19 January 2024;

3. Any party who receives submissions on costs from the other party may file in the Tribunal two (2) copies and is to give to the other party one (1) copy of their submissions, if any, in reply to the other party’s submissions on all before 4.00 pm on Friday, 9 February 2024;

4. Unless any party files in the Tribunal, and gives to the other party, by 4.00 pm on Friday 9 February 2024 a written request for an oral hearing of any application for costs, the Tribunal will determine the cost issue on the submissions filed by the parties, or either of them, pursuant to section 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) without an oral hearing.

5. If neither party files in the Tribunal submissions on costs on or before 4.00 pm on Friday, 9 February 2024 then each party to the proceedings must bear that party’s own costs for the proceeding.

6. The parties have liberty to apply to the Tribunal on fourteen (14) days written notice to the other party in respect for any further order or direction in respect of orders 1 to 4 (inclusive) above.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.