Western Areas Exploration Pty Ltd v Streeter [No 2]

Link copied
Case Copied 36 min read

WESTERN AREAS EXPLORATION PTY LTD -v- STREETER [No 2] [2008] WASC 217



SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2008] WASC 217
Case No:CIV:2126/200628 JULY 2008
Coram:LE MIERE J9/10/08
21Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: Leave to use discovered documents and to amend writ and statement of claim granted
Application for security for costs dismissed
B
PDF Version
Parties:WESTERN AREAS EXPLORATION PTY LTD (ACN 076 025 066)
TERRENCE ERNEST JAMES STREETER
DAVID CHARLES COOPERS
JUNGLE CREEK MINES PTY LTD (ACN 008 795 033)

Catchwords:

Civil practice and procedure
Pleadings
Application for leave to amend writ and statement of claim
Application for leave to use documents discovered in this action for the purposes of pleading and prosecuting a new proposed cause of action
Discretion of the court
Turns on own facts
Corporations law
Security for costs
Application that the plaintiff provide security for the defendants' costs
Whether there is credible testimony that there is reason to believe that the plaintiff will be unable to pay the costs of the defendants if they are successful in their defences
Discretion of the court
Turns on own facts
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335

Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1335

Case References:

Allstate Life Insurance Co v ANZ Banking Group (1995) 57 FCR 360
Ariss v Express Interiors Pty Ltd (in liq) [1996] 2 VR 507
Buckley v Bennell Design & Constructions Pty Ltd (1974) 1 ACLR 301
FFE Minerals Australia Pty Ltd v Mining Australia Pty Ltd [2000] WASCA 69; 33 ACSR 739
Gemelle Investments Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1982) 1 ACLC 470
Huang v University of New South Wales (No 3) [2006] FCA 626; (2006) 154 FCR 16
Livingspring Pty Ltd v Kliger Partners [2008] VSCA 93; (2008) 66 ACSR 455
Mann v Medical Defence Union [1997] FCA 45
Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd [1997] HCA 1; (1997) 189 CLR 146
Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver (1942) 1 All ER 378
SEA Food International Pty Ltd v Lam (1998) 16 ACLC 552
Sybron Corporation v Barclays Bank [1985] Ch 299
Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd v Oliver [1999] WASC 212
Wilden Pump Engineering Co v Fusfield [1985] FSR 581
Yandil Holdings Pty Ltd v Insurance Company of North America (1985) 3 ACLC 542


JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
    IN CHAMBERS
CITATION : WESTERN AREAS EXPLORATION PTY LTD -v- STREETER [No 2] [2008] WASC 217 CORAM : LE MIERE J HEARD : 28 JULY 2008 DELIVERED : 9 OCTOBER 2008 FILE NO/S : CIV 2126 of 2006 BETWEEN : WESTERN AREAS EXPLORATION PTY LTD (ACN 076 025 066)
    Plaintiff

    AND

    TERRENCE ERNEST JAMES STREETER
    First Defendant

    DAVID CHARLES COOPERS
    Second Defendant

    JUNGLE CREEK MINES PTY LTD (ACN 008 795 033)
    Third Defendant

(Page 2)


Catchwords:

Civil practice and procedure - Pleadings - Application for leave to amend writ and statement of claim - Application for leave to use documents…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Western Areas Exploration Pty Ltd v Streeter [No 2] and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2008] WASC 217
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Western Areas Exploration Pty Ltd brought proceedings against Mr Streeter and others, seeking various reliefs, including an injunction and damages. The plaintiff sought leave to amend its writ and statement of claim to include a new cause of action based on documents discovered during the course of the litigation. Additionally, the plaintiff sought an order for security for costs. The defendants opposed the applications on various grounds.

The legal issues before the court were whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to amend its writ and statement of claim to include the new cause of action, whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to use the discovered documents for the purposes of pleading and prosecuting the new cause of action, and whether the plaintiff should be ordered to provide security for the defendants' costs. The court had to consider the discretion available to it in each case, and whether the applications met the appropriate threshold.

The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for the new cause of action, and that the discovered documents were relevant and admissible. The court also found that the plaintiff had not demonstrated that it was likely to be unable to pay the defendants' costs if they were successful in their defences. The court exercised its discretion to grant leave to amend the writ and statement of claim, and to use the discovered documents. However, the court dismissed the application for security for costs.

The court made orders granting leave to use discovered documents and to amend writ and statement of claim, and dismissed the application for security for costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Leave to use discovered documents and to amend writ and statement of claim granted

Application for security for costs dismissed

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.