Weinstein (Trustee) v Morris

Case [2016] FCA 993


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Weinstein (Trustee) v Morris [2016] FCA 993

File number: WAD 145 of 2016
Judge: GILMOUR  J
Date of judgment: 9 June 2016
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY -  cross-border insolvency – US bankruptcy proceeding – recognition of US bankruptcy proceeding as foreign main proceeding under the Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 (Cth) and the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law
Legislation:

Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 416, 601CL

Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 (Cth) s 13

Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth) rr 14.03, 14.07(1)(d)

Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency of the United Nation’s Commission on International Trade Law, Articles 2, 15, 15(1), 17, 21(2), 22(1)

Cases cited:

Gainsford and Ors v Tannenbaum [2012] FCA 904

Kapila, Re Edelsten [2014] FCA 1112

Moore (as debtor-in-possession of Australian Equity Investors) v Australian Equity Investors [2012] FCA 1002

Date of hearing: 9 June 2016
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub Area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 43
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr L Christensen
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear

ORDERS

WAD 145 of 2016
BETWEEN:

MARLEEN G WEINSTEIN IN HER CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR THE ESTATE OF LILIAN MORRIS (AKA SHAMS AZAR YOUSEFI TEHRANI) APPOINTED UNDER CHAPTER 7 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE (US)

Applicant

AND:

LILIAN MORRIS (AKA SHAMS AZAR YOUSEFI TEHRANI)

Respondent

JUDGE:

GILMOUR  J

DATE OF ORDER:

9 JUNE 2016

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The administration and realisation of all of the respondent’s assets located in Australia be entrusted to the applicant in her capacity as trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of Lilian Morris (aka Shams Azar Yousefi Tehrani) appointed under Chapter 7 of the US Bankruptcy Code.

2.The distribution of all of the respondent’s assets located in Australia to be entrusted to the applicant, including the proceeds from the sale of a property, located at 116 Rothesay Heights, Mindarie, in the sum of $459,130.62 AUD and the additional amount of $70.68 AUD, currently being held in the Gadens Account, to be transferred to the applicant for the applicant’s possession and control for administration in connection with the US Proceedings, for the benefit of all creditors of the respondent.

3.The applicant has liberty to apply within 14 days on the question of costs.

Note:    Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

GILMOUR J:

  1. This application concerns the cross-border insolvency of the respondent, traversing Australia and the United States of America.  The applicant, as trustee of the bankrupt estate of the respondent, seeks orders, amongst others, for the administration and realisation of the defendant’s assets in Australia to be entrusted to the applicant in her capacity as trustee of the respondent’s bankrupt estate under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

  2. The applicant, at the outset of the hearing, sought the leave of the Court to amend the…

Continue reading Weinstein (Trustee) v Morris

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Weinstein (Trustee) v Morris [2016] FCA 993
Case
[2016] FCA 993
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Weinstein (Trustee) v Morris was a case heard in the Federal Court of Australia, concerning the recognition of a United States bankruptcy proceeding as a foreign main proceeding under the Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 and the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. The applicant, Marlene G Weinstein, was appointed as the Chapter 7 trustee of the respondent, Lilian Morris's, bankrupt estate in the United States Bankruptcy Court. The Mindarie Property, a vacant block of land in Western Australia, was owned by the respondent at the time of the US Conversion Order. The applicant consented to the sale of the Mindarie Property, on the condition that the surplus settlement proceeds be paid into Gadens' trust account, the applicant's local agent.

The legal issues in this case revolved around the recognition of the US bankruptcy proceeding as a foreign main proceeding in Australia and the distribution of the Mindarie Property sale proceeds to the appropriate parties. The court had to determine whether the US bankruptcy proceeding could be recognised as a foreign main proceeding under the Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 and the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. Additionally, the court had to decide the appropriate distribution of the Mindarie Property sale proceeds.

The court found that the US bankruptcy proceeding was a foreign main proceeding under the Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 and the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. Consequently, the administration and realisation of all the respondent's assets located in Australia, including the Mindarie Property sale proceeds, were to be entrusted to the applicant in her capacity as trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of Lilian Morris. The court also ordered the distribution of the Mindarie Property sale proceeds, amounting to $459,130.62 AUD plus an additional $70.68 AUD, to be transferred to the applicant for administration in connection with the US Proceedings, for the benefit of all creditors of the respondent.

In conclusion, the Federal Court of Australia recognised the US bankruptcy proceeding as a foreign main proceeding and entrusted the administration and realisation of Lilian Morris's Australian assets, including the Mindarie Property sale proceeds, to Marlene G Weinstein as the Chapter 7 trustee. The court's decision ensured that the distribution of the Mindarie Property sale proceeds would benefit all creditors of the respondent, in accordance with the US Proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The administration and realisation of all of the respondent’s assets located in Australia be entrusted to the applicant in her capacity as trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of Lilian Morris (aka Shams Azar Yousefi Tehrani) appointed under Chapter 7 of the US Bankruptcy Code.

2. The distribution of all of the respondent’s assets located in Australia to be entrusted to the applicant, including the proceeds from the sale of a property, located at 116 Rothesay Heights, Mindarie, in the sum of $459,130.62 AUD and the additional amount of $70.68 AUD, currently being held in the Gadens Account, to be transferred to the applicant for the applicant’s possession and control for administration in connection with the US Proceedings, for the benefit of all creditors of the respondent.

3. The applicant has liberty to apply within 14 days on the question of costs.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

The applicant read the following affidavits in support of the Application:(a)Affidavit of Marlene G Weinstein sworn on 11 April 2016 (First Weinstein Affidavit) with exhibit MGW1 (Exhibit);(b)Affidavit of Courtney Jayne Manzoney affirmed on 9 May 2016 (First Manzoney Affidavit);(c)Affidavit of Charles P Maher sworn on 10 May 2016 (Maher Affidavit);(d)Affidavit of Marlene G Weinstein sworn on 11 May 2016 (Second Weinstein Affidavit);(e)Affidavit of Justin Bates sworn on 24 May 2016 (First Bates Affidavit);(f)Affidavit of Justin Bates sworn on 26 May 2016 (Second Bates Affidavit);(g)Affidavit of Courtney Jayne Manzoney affirmed on 2 June 2016 (Second Manzoney Affidavit).Background The following background is not controversial and is drawn substantially from the applicant’s written submissions.Appointment The applicant was appointed as Chapter 7 trustee of the bankrupt estate of the respondent on 25 February 2016 by the United States Bankruptcy Court in case number 15-42732 CN (US Bankruptcy Proceedings), when the respondent’s Chapter 11 reorganisation case was converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation (US Conversion Order).Local Property At the time of the US Conversion Order, the respondent was the sole registered proprietor of a vacant block of land at 116 Rothesay Heights, Mindarie (Mindarie Property), in the state of Western Australia. On or about 11 March 2016, the applicant received a copy of a contract for sale for the Mindarie Property, between the respondent and Neil and Sophia Dawe. The applicant considered that the respondent did not have standing to enter into the contract at the time that it was executed, in view of the US Conversion Order. Nonetheless, the applicant, in order to allow the sale to proceed, consented to the sale of the Mindarie property on the basis that the respondent would direct that all surplus settlement proceeds be paid to the trust account of Gadens, who were appointed as the applicant’s local agent pursuant to an order made on 4 April 2016 in the United States Bankruptcy Court. The settlement of the sale of the Mindarie Property occurred on 29 April 2016, with the consent of the applicant. At settlement of the sale of the Mindarie Property, a cheque in the amount of $459,130.62 AUD, was paid in favour of the Gaden’s trust account and was deposited into that account. As at 8 June 2016, the sale proceeds remained in Gaden’s trust account, along with an additional amount of $70.68 AUD, being a refund due to the respondent on the sale of the Mindarie Property. Notification to respondent and respondent’s known creditors On 23 May 2016, notification of orders made on 3 May 2016 was given together with a copy of the consent to act as Trustee and Form B20 to the respondent, care of her attorney on the record for her in the US Bankruptcy Proceeding. On 23 May 2016, the attorney for the respondent in the US Bankruptcy Proceedings changed. On 26 May 2016, notification of the orders made on 3 May 2016 was sent to the new attorney for the respondent in the US Bankruptcy Proceedings by way of a letter from Justin Bates dated 25 May 2016.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.