FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Weinstein (Trustee) v Morris [2016] FCA 993
File number: WAD 145 of 2016 Judge: GILMOUR J Date of judgment: 9 June 2016 Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY - cross-border insolvency – US bankruptcy proceeding – recognition of US bankruptcy proceeding as foreign main proceeding under the Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 (Cth) and the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 416, 601CL
Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 (Cth) s 13
Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth) rr 14.03, 14.07(1)(d)
Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency of the United Nation’s Commission on International Trade Law, Articles 2, 15, 15(1), 17, 21(2), 22(1)
Cases cited: Gainsford and Ors v Tannenbaum [2012] FCA 904
Kapila, Re Edelsten [2014] FCA 1112
Date of hearing: 9 June 2016 Registry: Western Australia Division: General Division National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub Area: General and Personal Insolvency Number of paragraphs: 43 Counsel for the Applicant: Mr L Christensen Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear ORDERS
WAD 145 of 2016 BETWEEN: MARLEEN G WEINSTEIN IN HER CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR THE ESTATE OF LILIAN MORRIS (AKA SHAMS AZAR YOUSEFI TEHRANI) APPOINTED UNDER CHAPTER 7 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE (US)
Applicant
AND: LILIAN MORRIS (AKA SHAMS AZAR YOUSEFI TEHRANI)
Respondent
JUDGE:
GILMOUR J
DATE OF ORDER:
9 JUNE 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The administration and realisation of all of the respondent’s assets located in Australia be entrusted to the applicant in her capacity as trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of Lilian Morris (aka Shams Azar Yousefi Tehrani) appointed under Chapter 7 of the US Bankruptcy Code.
2.The distribution of all of the respondent’s assets located in Australia to be entrusted to the applicant, including the proceeds from the sale of a property, located at 116 Rothesay Heights, Mindarie, in the sum of $459,130.62 AUD and the additional amount of $70.68 AUD, currently being held in the Gadens Account, to be transferred to the applicant for the applicant’s possession and control for administration in connection with the US Proceedings, for the benefit of all creditors of the respondent.
3.The applicant has liberty to apply within 14 days on the question of costs.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
GILMOUR J:
This application concerns the cross-border insolvency of the respondent, traversing Australia and the United States of America. The applicant, as trustee of the bankrupt estate of the respondent, seeks orders, amongst others, for the administration and realisation of the defendant’s assets in Australia to be entrusted to the applicant in her capacity as trustee of the respondent’s bankrupt estate under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.
The applicant, at the outset of the hearing, sought the leave of the Court to amend the…
Continue reading Weinstein (Trustee) v Morris
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Weinstein (Trustee) v Morris [2016] FCA 993
- Case
- [2016] FCA 993
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in this case revolved around the recognition of the US bankruptcy proceeding as a foreign main proceeding in Australia and the distribution of the Mindarie Property sale proceeds to the appropriate parties. The court had to determine whether the US bankruptcy proceeding could be recognised as a foreign main proceeding under the Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 and the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. Additionally, the court had to decide the appropriate distribution of the Mindarie Property sale proceeds.
The court found that the US bankruptcy proceeding was a foreign main proceeding under the Cross-Border Insolvency Act 2008 and the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. Consequently, the administration and realisation of all the respondent's assets located in Australia, including the Mindarie Property sale proceeds, were to be entrusted to the applicant in her capacity as trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of Lilian Morris. The court also ordered the distribution of the Mindarie Property sale proceeds, amounting to $459,130.62 AUD plus an additional $70.68 AUD, to be transferred to the applicant for administration in connection with the US Proceedings, for the benefit of all creditors of the respondent.
In conclusion, the Federal Court of Australia recognised the US bankruptcy proceeding as a foreign main proceeding and entrusted the administration and realisation of Lilian Morris's Australian assets, including the Mindarie Property sale proceeds, to Marlene G Weinstein as the Chapter 7 trustee. The court's decision ensured that the distribution of the Mindarie Property sale proceeds would benefit all creditors of the respondent, in accordance with the US Proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The administration and realisation of all of the respondent’s assets located in Australia be entrusted to the applicant in her capacity as trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of Lilian Morris (aka Shams Azar Yousefi Tehrani) appointed under Chapter 7 of the US Bankruptcy Code.
2. The distribution of all of the respondent’s assets located in Australia to be entrusted to the applicant, including the proceeds from the sale of a property, located at 116 Rothesay Heights, Mindarie, in the sum of $459,130.62 AUD and the additional amount of $70.68 AUD, currently being held in the Gadens Account, to be transferred to the applicant for the applicant’s possession and control for administration in connection with the US Proceedings, for the benefit of all creditors of the respondent.
3. The applicant has liberty to apply within 14 days on the question of costs.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.