Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Webb v Port Stephens Council [2022] NSWCATAD 404 Hearing dates: 31 October 2022 Date of orders: 20 December 2022 Decision date: 20 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J Levine, Senior Member Decision: (1) The Decision under review is affirmed.
(2) Pursuant to section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), disclosure of the material filed by the Respondent on a confidential basis is prohibited. That material is not to be released to the Applicant or the public.
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – access to government information – interested party – request for access to portions of documents – whether disclosure would reveal personal information – whether disclosure would undermine competitive neutrality of an agency or place it at a disadvantage in any market – whether disclosure would diminish competitive commercial value of information – whether disclosure would prejudice a person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests – whether form of access requested would involve an infringement of copyright
Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW)
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)
Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW)
Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Amos v Central Coast Council [2018] NSWCATAD 101
CH Real Estate Pty Limited (t/a Raine & Horne Commercial, Penrith) v Penrith City Council [2005] NSWADT 147
Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Camilleri [2012] NSWADTAP 19
Elf Farm Supplies Pty Ltd v Department of Planning and Environment [2018] NSWCATAD 277
Fisher v Goulburn Mulwaree Council [2019] NSWCATAD 34
Hurst v Wagga Wagga City Council [2011] NSWADT 307
Leech v Sydney Water Corporation [2010] NSWADT 298
McKinnon v Blacktown City Council [2012] NSWADT 44
Sandy v Kiama Municipal Council [2019] NSWCATAD 49
Transport for NSW v Searle [2018] NSWCATAP 93
YG and GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247
Texts Cited: Information and Privacy Commission New South Wales, “Fact Sheet – The GIPA Act and Copyright” (2019)
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Telina Webb (Applicant)
Port Stephens Council (Respondent)
Also heard:
Crown Solicitor (see s104(1), Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009)Representation: Applicant (Self Represented)
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
Crown Solicitor (Self Represented)
File Number(s): 2022/00138219 Publication restriction: Pursuant to section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), disclosure of the material filed by the Respondent on a confidential basis is prohibited. That material is not to be released to either the Applicant or the public.
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
-
Ms Telina Webb (“Applicant”) has applied to the New South Wales Civil and Appeals Tribunal (“Tribunal” or “NCAT”) for administrative review of a decision made on 6 January 2022 (“Decision”) by the Port Stephens Council (“Council” or “Respondent”) under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (“GIPA Act”) refusing her access to some of the information she had requested on 17 November 2021 (“Access Application”).
-
The Access Application was for six categories of…
Continue reading Webb v Port Stephens Council
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Webb v Port Stephens Council [2022] NSWCATAD 404
- Case
- [2022] NSWCATAD 404
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the disclosure of the requested information would reveal personal information, undermine the competitive neutrality of the Council, diminish the commercial value of the information, prejudice the applicant's legitimate business interests, or infringe on copyright. The court had to balance the public's right to access information against the statutory exemptions and exceptions that justified withholding such information.
In determining the matter, the court examined the specific exemptions and exceptions relevant to the withheld information. It found that the requested information, if disclosed, would have compromised the privacy of individuals and could potentially harm the Council's competitive position and commercial interests. The court was satisfied that the respondent had correctly applied the relevant legislative provisions in withholding the information. Consequently, the tribunal affirmed the decision of the Council not to disclose the requested material. Additionally, under section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), the court prohibited the disclosure of the material filed by the respondent on a confidential basis, ensuring it was not released to the applicant or the public.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The Decision under review is affirmed.
(2) Pursuant to section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), disclosure of the material filed by the Respondent on a confidential basis is prohibited. That material is not to be released to the Applicant or the public.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.