Legal Research
Cases
Weatherill v Tiakia

Weatherill v Tiakia

Case [2025] WADC 26 6 May 2025

Type to search within this case.

JURISDICTION : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
IN CIVIL

LOCATION:   PERTH
CITATION:   WEATHERILL -v- TIAKIA [2025] WADC 26
CORAM:   CURWOOD DCJ
HEARD:   21 NOVEMBER 2024
DELIVERED          :   6 MAY 2025
FILE NO/S:   APP 2 of 2024
MATTER: IN THE MATTER of Part 7 of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act 2003
BETWEEN:   JARROD CHARLES WEATHERILL
Appellant
AND
TONI NIGEL TIAKIA
Respondent

ON APPEAL FROM:
Jurisdiction              :   CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION ASSESSOR OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Coram:   A V BARTER
File Number            :   CIC 2274/2023

Catchwords:

Criminal injuries compensation - Appeal against Assessor's decision refusing to make a compensation award - Proven offence and alleged offence - Assessor's decision reversed - Compensation assessed - Turns on own facts

Legislation:

Criminal Injuries Compensation Act 2003 (WA), s 3, s 12, s 17, s 30, s 39, s 41, s 48, s 55, s 56

Result:

Appeal allowed, Assessor's decision reversed
Compensation assessed

Representation:

Counsel:

Appellant	:	Mr M A Tedeschi
Respondent	:	No appearance
Amicus Curiae	:	Ms A H Sanchez-Lawson appeared on behalf of the Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Justice

Solicitors:

Appellant	:	SJB Legal
Respondent	:	Not applicable
Amicus Curiae	:	State Solicitor for Western Australia

Case(s) referred to in decision(s):

August v Lynch [2019] WADC 78
Bothma v Hildebrand [2019] WADC 92
Gullelo v Halloran [2008] WADC 145
Guy v Hampson [2019] WADC 19
KMA v DFS [2010] WADC 6
Lloyd v Small (1996) 16 SR (WA) 111
LS v SL [2023] WADC 8
Mangisi v Boehm [2021] WADC 76
Martin v Martin [2015] WADC 138
Nurovic v Nurovic [2019] WADC 28
Re Application of Ann-Maree Hanratty (1984) 14 A Crim R 36
Re Carter (1984) 4 SR (WA) 219
Re Coad [2023] WADC 9
Re Collard [2018] WADC 1
Re Jackamarra [2014] WADC 9
Re Robinson [2017] WADC 18
Re TLJ [2016] WADC 74
Re ZD (pseudonym initials) [2024] WADC 42
S v Neumann (1995) 14 WAR 452
Savic v Duric [2021] WADC 53
Turner v Dinsdale [2023] WADC 153
Underwood v Underwood [2018] WADC 13

CURWOOD DCJ:

Introduction and overview

The appellant (Mr Weatherill) appeals an Assessor's refusal of his application for criminal injuries compensation for injuries he suffered on 15 September 2021. Mr Weatherill's injuries occurred during a physical fight with the respondent (Mr Tiakia). After a trivial traffic dispute, Mr Tiakia followed Mr Weatherill to his home and assaulted him. Though the physical fight was one incident, it can be divided into two parts.
The first part of the incident unfolded when Mr Tiakia followed Mr Weatherill to his home. While Mr Weatherill was parking his car, Mr Tiakia got out of his own car. He walked up to Mr Weatherill's car, reached through the driver's window, grabbed his shirt and shook him, assaulting him. Mr Tiakia pleaded guilty to aggravated common assault for this part of the incident. I will refer to this as the 'proved offence' so as to be consistent with s 12 of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act 2003 (WA)…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading Weatherill v Tiakia

Details

AGLC: Weatherill v Tiakia [2025] WADC 26
Case: [2025] WADC 26
Decision Date: 6 MAY 2025

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Weatherill sought compensation for injuries sustained during an incident where he was assaulted. The claim was based on an offence that was not proven in court, but which he claimed was committed against him. Tiakia opposed the claim, arguing that Weatherill had not been the victim of a crime. The matter was assessed by an appointed Assessor who found that no compensation should be awarded. Weatherill appealed this decision to the court.

The legal issue before the court was whether the Assessor was correct to find that no compensation should be awarded. Weatherill argued that he was a victim of a crime and that the Assessor should have considered the effect of the offence on him. Tiakia maintained that the Assessor's decision was correct and that Weatherill was not entitled to compensation as the offence had not been proven. The court had to determine if the Assessor's decision was legally sound and if the correct test was applied.

The court found that the Assessor had erred in his approach to the decision. The court held that the correct test was whether Weatherill had suffered injuries as a result of a crime, regardless of whether the offence was proven. The court found that Weatherill had suffered injuries as a result of the offence, and that the Assessor should have taken this into account when deciding whether to award compensation. The court held that the Assessor's decision was legally flawed and reversed it, assessing compensation in favour of Weatherill. The court found that the appropriate amount of compensation was $15,000.

Orders