Waysco Pty Ltd v Danjohn Investments Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2024] ATMO 13
•25 January 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Waysco Pty Ltd v Danjohn Investments Pty Ltd [2024] ATMO 13
[2024] ATMO 13
25 January 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Registrar of Trade Marks considered an application by Waysco Pty Ltd for registration of a trade mark, opposed by Danjohn Investments Pty Ltd. The dispute concerned whether the trade mark should be registered in respect of the goods specified in the application, or if certain goods should be removed from the specification.
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was to decide, pursuant to section 55 of the relevant legislation, whether to register the trade mark or refuse registration, having regard to the grounds of opposition. Specifically, the Registrar had to determine the extent to which the opposition, based on section 58, had been established in relation to the applicant's specified goods.
The Registrar reasoned that the opponent had established the ground of opposition under section 58 in respect of some of the applicant's goods. Consequently, the Registrar proposed to refuse registration unless the applicant agreed to amend the specification of goods by deleting certain items related to solar energy collection and generation. The applicant's attorney subsequently confirmed agreement to this amendment.
As a result, the Registrar ordered that the trade mark may proceed to registration with the agreed amendment, subject to the expiry of the relevant appeal period. The Registrar declined to make an award of costs, noting that both parties had achieved some measure of success in the proceedings.
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was to decide, pursuant to section 55 of the relevant legislation, whether to register the trade mark or refuse registration, having regard to the grounds of opposition. Specifically, the Registrar had to determine the extent to which the opposition, based on section 58, had been established in relation to the applicant's specified goods.
The Registrar reasoned that the opponent had established the ground of opposition under section 58 in respect of some of the applicant's goods. Consequently, the Registrar proposed to refuse registration unless the applicant agreed to amend the specification of goods by deleting certain items related to solar energy collection and generation. The applicant's attorney subsequently confirmed agreement to this amendment.
As a result, the Registrar ordered that the trade mark may proceed to registration with the agreed amendment, subject to the expiry of the relevant appeal period. The Registrar declined to make an award of costs, noting that both parties had achieved some measure of success in the proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
13
Statutory Material Cited
0
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Sartas No 1 Pty Ltd v Koukourou & Partners Pty Ltd
[1994] FCA 936
PDP Capital Pty Ltd v Grasshopper Ventures Pty Ltd
[2020] FCA 1078