Watkins v Queensland Building Services Authority
Case
•
[2013] QCAT 535
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Watkins v Queensland Building Services Authority [2013] QCAT 535
[2013] QCAT 535
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter before the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) is an application by Mr Russell Ian Watkins, a builder holding a licence under the Queensland Building Services Authority Act 1991, to review a decision by the Queensland Building Services Authority (Authority) to approve a statutory insurance claim made by a building owner, Ms Ralph, in relation to residential building work performed by Mr Watkins at Ormiston, Brisbane. Mr Watkins also sought an extension of time to commence the substantive application. The legal issues before the Tribunal were whether section 61 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (QCAT Act) allows the Tribunal to extend the time limits in section 86(2) of the Queensland Building Services Authority Act 1991 (QBSAA), and whether the prohibition in section 86(2) of the QBSAA is substantive or procedural.
Dr J R Forbes, Member, found that the application for review should be read beneficially to refer to at least two categories of decisions that the Tribunal has power to review under the QBSAA. However, the application was filed more than three years after the subject decision was made and must fail unless the Tribunal allows an extraordinarily long extension of time. The Member declined to follow an interlocutory decision of the District Court that section 61 of the QCAT Act enables the Tribunal to extend the time limits in section 86(2) of the QBSAA. The Member held that the prohibition in section 86(2) is substantive and a condition of jurisdiction, and that section 61 of the QCAT Act may not be used to escape it. The application for review was incurably out of time and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain it.
The final orders of the Tribunal were that the application for extension of time and the application for review were dismissed.
Dr J R Forbes, Member, found that the application for review should be read beneficially to refer to at least two categories of decisions that the Tribunal has power to review under the QBSAA. However, the application was filed more than three years after the subject decision was made and must fail unless the Tribunal allows an extraordinarily long extension of time. The Member declined to follow an interlocutory decision of the District Court that section 61 of the QCAT Act enables the Tribunal to extend the time limits in section 86(2) of the QBSAA. The Member held that the prohibition in section 86(2) is substantive and a condition of jurisdiction, and that section 61 of the QCAT Act may not be used to escape it. The application for review was incurably out of time and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain it.
The final orders of the Tribunal were that the application for extension of time and the application for review were dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Limitation Periods
-
Res Judicata
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Allen v TKN Civil Works 2019 Pty Ltd [2023] QCATA 54
Cases Citing This Decision
46
Allen v TKN Civil Works 2019 Pty Ltd
[2023] QCATA 54
SBT v Bernats Lewis Real Estate
[2022] QCATA 71
The Handmade Food Co Pty Ltd v Biotech Laboratories Pty Ltd
[2022] QCATA 47
Cases Cited
25
Statutory Material Cited
0
Marshall v Watson
[1972] HCA 27
Marshall v Watson
[1972] HCA 27
Queensland Building Services Authority v Watkins
[2013] QDC 198