WAN
v
BT FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED & ORS
[2023] HCASL 76
M15/2023
The applicant requires an extension of time in which to seek special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (McEvoy J, Markovic and McElwaine JJ agreeing). The application raises no question of general principle and there is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Full Court. It would therefore be futile to grant an extension of time. The application should be dismissed.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
J.J. Edelman J.S. Gleeson 11 May 2023
Continue reading Wan v BT Funds Management Limited & Ors
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Wan v BT Funds Management Limited & Ors [2023] HCASL 76
- Case
- [2023] HCASL 76
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the circumstances of the case and considered whether the applicant had a valid reason to seek an extension. However, it found that the application raised no question of general principle, and there was no evidence to suggest that the Full Court's decision was incorrect. The court held that granting an extension of time would be futile, as it would not lead to a different outcome. Therefore, the court dismissed the application for an extension of time.
The court's reasoning was based on the fact that the application did not present any question of general principle, and there was no reason to doubt the correctness of the Full Court's decision. The court held that granting an extension of time would be futile, as it would not lead to a different outcome. The court further noted that the application did not present any new evidence or arguments that had not already been considered by the Full Court. Therefore, the court dismissed the application and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application.
In summary, the court dismissed the applicant's application for an extension of time to seek special leave to appeal a decision made by the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia. The court found that the application raised no question of general principle, and there was no reason to doubt the correctness of the Full Court's decision. The court held that granting an extension of time would be futile, as it would not lead to a different outcome. The court's decision was based on the principles of futility and the absence of any new evidence or arguments.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.