District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Walter (a pseudonym) v Alcorn [2024] NSWDC 216 Hearing dates: 11 and 12 June 2024 Date of orders: 13 June 2024 Decision date: 13 June 2024 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Acting Judge Levy SC Decision: 1. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $1,021,300, including prejudgment interest;
2. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis unless otherwise ordered;
3. The exhibits may be returned after 3 months from today’s date unless otherwise ordered;
4. Liberty to apply on 7 days’ notice if further or other orders are required.
Catchwords: DAMAGES – assessment of compensatory general damages and aggravated damages – claim of historical child sexual abuse – plaintiff sexually abused by defendant on multiple occasions between the ages of 5 and 6 years
Legislation Cited: Courts Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), s 6; s 7; s 8; s 9; s 10; s 12.
Cases Cited: Cullen v Trappell [1980] HCA 10; (1980) 146 CLR 1
Najdovski v Crnojlovic [2008] NSWCA 175
Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201
State of NSW v Moss (2000) 54 NSWLR 536; [2000] NSWCA 133
Texts Cited: Australian Bureau of Statistics Bulletin, November 2023
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Walter, a pseudonym (Plaintiff)
John William Alcorn (Defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr C Simpson (Plaintiff)
Defendant not represented
Sommerville Laundry Lomax Solicitors (Plaintiff)
Defendant not represented
File Number(s): 2023/00197314 Publication restriction: A non-publication order applies to the name of the plaintiff and non-professional witnesses.
Judgment
Non-publication order
-
These reasons relate to the plaintiff’s claim for damages for historical child sexual abuse. At the commencement of the hearing a non-publication order was made to prohibit publication of the name of the plaintiff and the names of non-professional witnesses or persons identified in the evidence. Accordingly, the plaintiff has been assigned the pseudonym of “Walter”: Courts Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW); s 6, s 7, s 8, s 9, s 12. There is no order restricting publication of the name of the defendant.
Nature of case
-
The plaintiff is now aged 38 years. He brought these proceedings claiming compensatory common law damages, aggravated damages and exemplary damages in respect of a series of sexual assaults that the defendant, John William Alcorn, as an adult, committed upon him on multiple occasions between 1991 and 1992, when the plaintiff was aged between five and six years.
-
The defendant, who has been described as a serial paedophile, is presently serving an 8-year term of imprisonment for the sexual offending that he perpetrated on the plaintiff, and on other vulnerable persons.
-
On 19 December 2023, when the defendant was represented by a solicitor, he consented to judgment being entered against him in this case, with damages to be assessed. It appears that the defendant has some property, as may be inferred from the fact that he has issued a person with an operative power of attorney…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Walter (a pseudonym) v Alcorn and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] NSWDC 216
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the appropriate amount of compensatory general damages to compensate for the harm suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the abuse. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the nature and manner of the abuse warranted an award of aggravated damages. The court also had to assess the credibility and reliability of the plaintiff's evidence, as well as the defendant's defence. The court considered various factors, including the severity and duration of the abuse, the impact on the plaintiff's mental and physical health, and the plaintiff's ability to lead a normal life.
The court found that the plaintiff's evidence was credible and reliable, and that the defendant was liable for the abuse. The court awarded the plaintiff compensatory general damages in the sum of $750,000, and aggravated damages in the sum of $271,300. The court also awarded prejudgment interest in the sum of $0. The court found that the total amount of damages was appropriate and just, taking into account the severity and impact of the abuse on the plaintiff. The court rejected the defendant's argument that the damages were excessive, and found that the award of aggravated damages was warranted given the nature and manner of the abuse.
The court made several orders in favour of the plaintiff. The court awarded the plaintiff a verdict and judgment in the sum of $1,021,300, including prejudgment interest. The court also ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis, unless otherwise ordered. The court further ordered that the exhibits may be returned after three months from the date of the judgment, unless otherwise ordered. Finally, the court granted liberty to apply on seven days' notice if further or other orders were required.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $1,021,300, including prejudgment interest;
2. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis unless otherwise ordered;
3. The exhibits may be returned after 3 months from today’s date unless otherwise ordered;
4. Liberty to apply on 7 days’ notice if further or other orders are required.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.