Wadlow and Kaldman and Ors
Case
•
[2013] FCCA 1033
•7 August 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
WADLOW & KALDMAN & ORS
[2013] FCCA 1033
[2013] FCCA 1033
7 August 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Wadlow and Kaldman and Ors*, heard before Judge Bender, the dispute concerned parenting orders for a child named [X]. The applicant sought to vary existing orders, leading to a determination of the appropriate parenting arrangements for [X].
The court was required to determine the best interests of the child, [X], in light of the circumstances presented. This involved assessing the parental responsibility, living arrangements, and the nature and extent of contact between [X] and the respondents, including the first-named respondent mother, the second-named respondent father, and the third-named respondent maternal grandfather.
Judge Bender ordered the discharge of all previous parenting orders. The applicant was granted sole parental responsibility for [X], with [X] to live with the applicant. The mother and father were permitted to send correspondence and gifts to [X] on special occasions and no more than once per fortnight, subject to the applicant's veto. Crucially, the third-named respondent maternal grandfather was ordered to spend no time with [X] and was restrained from approaching, communicating with, or being within 500 metres of [X]. The applicant was authorised to provide these orders to [X]'s educational and medical providers.
The court was required to determine the best interests of the child, [X], in light of the circumstances presented. This involved assessing the parental responsibility, living arrangements, and the nature and extent of contact between [X] and the respondents, including the first-named respondent mother, the second-named respondent father, and the third-named respondent maternal grandfather.
Judge Bender ordered the discharge of all previous parenting orders. The applicant was granted sole parental responsibility for [X], with [X] to live with the applicant. The mother and father were permitted to send correspondence and gifts to [X] on special occasions and no more than once per fortnight, subject to the applicant's veto. Crucially, the third-named respondent maternal grandfather was ordered to spend no time with [X] and was restrained from approaching, communicating with, or being within 500 metres of [X]. The applicant was authorised to provide these orders to [X]'s educational and medical providers.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Remedies
-
Injunction
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
WADLOW & KALDMAN & ORS
[2013] FCCA 1033
Most Recent Citation
REIBY & MEADOWBANK & ANOR
[2013] FCCA 2040
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
3
Briginshaw v Briginshaw
[1938] HCA 34
Briginshaw v Briginshaw
[1938] HCA 34