Vigor Master Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council

Link copied
Case Copied 28 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Vigor Master Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2025] NSWLEC 1520
Hearing dates: 7 and 10 March 2025
Date of orders: 21 July 2025
Decision date: 21 July 2025
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon SC
Decision:

The Court orders:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Development consent is granted to development application DA2023/1932 for a senior living development located at 72 to 76 Willandra Road, Oxford Falls NSW of Lot 807, Lot 810 and Lot 811 in DP 752038, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A.

(3) The exhibits are to be returned following publication of the judgment except for Exs A and 1.

Catchwords:

APPEAL – development application – senior living – biodiversity impacts – statutory interpretation

Legislation Cited:

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), Pts 4, 5, ss 1.7, 4.15, 7.5, 7.13, 8.7

Biodiversity Conservation Act2016 (NSW), Pts 4, 6, 7, ss 1.3, 6.2, 6.4, 6.7, 6.15, 7.5, 7.7, 7.12, 7.13, 8.4

Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW), s 100B

Water Management Act 2000 (NSW), s 91

Biodiversity Conservation Regulation 2017, ss 1.4, 1.5, 4, 6.31

State Environmental Planning Policy (Koala Habitation Protection) 2021

Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2000, Div 4, Pt 4, cll 12, 14, 56, 58

Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2011

Cases Cited:

Adrenaline Pty ltd v Bathurst Regional Council (2015) 97 NSWLR 207; [2015] NSWCA 123

Altre Partners Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2023] NSWLEC 1145

Goldcoral Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) v Richmond Valley Council [2024] NSWLEC 77

Planners North v Ballina Shire Council [2021] NSWLEC 120

Platform Architects Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2020] NSWLEC 185

Save Sydney’s Koala’s (Southwest) Inc v Lendlease Communities (Figtree Hill) Pty Ltd(No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 102

Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown Council [2020] NSWCA 106

Texts Cited:

Australian Standard for the "Construction of buildings in bushfire-prone areas” AS 3959:2018

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Vigor Master Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
T F Robertson SC (Applicant)
C Rose (Solicitor) (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/122570
Publication restriction: Nil

JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. These proceedings arise following an appeal by Vigor Master Pty Ltd (applicant) pursuant to s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act1979 (NSW) (EPA Act) against Northern Beaches Council’s (Council) refusal of its development application DA2023/1932 for the construction of a seniors’ living development at 72 to 76 Willandra Road, Oxford Falls (Lot 807, Lot 810 and Lot 811 in DP 752038) (site).

  2. As the site and the surrounding privately owned bushland is designated as Category 1 Bushfire Prone Land, the development incorporates the clearing of vegetation to accommodate an Asset Protection Zone (APZ) around the built form. The proposed clearing has triggered an assessment of the biodiversity impacts of the development under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (NSW) (BC Act), and the Biodiversity Development Assessment Report (BDAR) has assessed the need for…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Vigor Master Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2025] NSWLEC 1520
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Vigor Master Pty Ltd, the applicant, appealed to the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales against a decision by the Northern Beaches Council, the respondent, to refuse development consent for a proposed senior living development at 72 to 76 Willandra Road, Oxford Falls, NSW. The applicant sought to develop a site comprising Lot 807, Lot 810 and Lot 811 in DP 752038. The dispute centred on whether the Council's decision to refuse development consent was lawful and whether the applicant's proposal met the criteria set out in the relevant planning and development legislation and policies.

The court had to determine whether the Council's decision to refuse development consent was legally sound and whether it appropriately considered all relevant factors. This included whether the refusal was based on relevant and material considerations, and whether the decision-making process complied with the applicable planning and development laws. Additionally, the court had to assess whether the applicant's proposal met the necessary planning and development standards, including environmental and community impact considerations.

The Court found that the Council's decision to refuse development consent was not based on all relevant considerations and failed to properly apply the criteria in the relevant planning and development laws. The court held that the Council had not appropriately assessed the applicant's proposal against the criteria for development consent, including the environmental and community impact considerations. The Court found that the applicant's proposal was consistent with the relevant planning and development policies and met the necessary standards for development consent. Accordingly, the Court held that the appeal should be upheld, and development consent should be granted subject to the specified conditions in Annexure A.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Development consent is granted to development application DA2023/1932 for a senior living development located at 72 to 76 Willandra Road, Oxford Falls NSW of Lot 807, Lot 810 and Lot 811 in DP 752038, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A.

(3) The exhibits are to be returned following publication of the judgment except for Exs A and 1.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.