Vicinity Funds Re Ltd & Ors
vCommissioner of State Revenue
[2022] HCASL 220
M59/2022
The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria. The application concerns the interpretation of a procedural provision in a Victorian taxing statute and raises no question of interpretive principle. Further, the Court of Appeal's decision is not attended by doubt. The application should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.
S.J. Gageler J.S. Gleeson 15 December 2022
Continue reading Vicinity Funds Re Ltd & Ors v Commissioner of State Revenue
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Vicinity Funds Re Ltd & Ors v Commissioner of State Revenue [2022] HCASL 220
- Case
- [2022] HCASL 220
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court were whether the Court of Appeal's interpretation of the statutory provision was correct and whether there was any doubt surrounding the Court of Appeal's decision. The Court was tasked with determining whether special leave should be granted to the applicants to appeal the decision, given the lack of any question of interpretive principle and the absence of doubt regarding the Court of Appeal's decision.
The Court found that the applicants' argument did not raise any question of interpretive principle and that the Court of Appeal's decision was not attended by doubt. The Court held that, in light of these findings, the application for special leave to appeal should be refused. Consequently, the Court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs. The decision was handed down on 15 December 2022, with S.J. Gageler and J.S. Gleeson participating in the ruling.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.