Vicinity Funds Re Ltd & Ors v Commissioner of State Revenue

Case [2022] HCASL 220


Vicinity Funds Re Ltd & Ors
v

Commissioner of State Revenue
[2022] HCASL 220
M59/2022

  1. The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria. The application concerns the interpretation of a procedural provision in a Victorian taxing statute and raises no question of interpretive principle. Further, the Court of Appeal's decision is not attended by doubt. The application should be refused.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

S.J. Gageler J.S. Gleeson
15 December 2022

Continue reading Vicinity Funds Re Ltd & Ors v Commissioner of State Revenue

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Vicinity Funds Re Ltd & Ors v Commissioner of State Revenue [2022] HCASL 220
Case
[2022] HCASL 220
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Vicinity Funds Re Ltd & Ors v Commissioner of State Revenue, the applicants sought special leave to appeal a decision made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria. The appeal pertained to the interpretation of a procedural provision in a Victorian taxing statute. The applicants argued that the Court of Appeal had erred in its interpretation of the statutory provision, which they believed led to an unjust outcome in their tax dispute with the Commissioner of State Revenue.

The legal issues before the Court were whether the Court of Appeal's interpretation of the statutory provision was correct and whether there was any doubt surrounding the Court of Appeal's decision. The Court was tasked with determining whether special leave should be granted to the applicants to appeal the decision, given the lack of any question of interpretive principle and the absence of doubt regarding the Court of Appeal's decision.

The Court found that the applicants' argument did not raise any question of interpretive principle and that the Court of Appeal's decision was not attended by doubt. The Court held that, in light of these findings, the application for special leave to appeal should be refused. Consequently, the Court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs. The decision was handed down on 15 December 2022, with S.J. Gageler and J.S. Gleeson participating in the ruling.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.