Vasilopoulos and Migration Agents' Registration Authority

Case [2005] AATA 368


Administrative

Appeals

Tribunal

 

DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2005] AATA 368

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL      )

)          No V2004/507

GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE  DIVISION )
Re ARTHUR VASILOPOULOS

Applicant

And

MIGRATION AGENTS' REGISTRATION AUTHORITY

Respondent

DECISION

Tribunal Senior Member Joan Dwyer

Date27 April 2005  

PlaceMelbourne

Decision

The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review.  In substitution, the Tribunal decides:

(i) Mr Vasilopoulos has not complied with clauses 2.8(a), (c) and (d), 5.2, 6.1(c) and 11.3 of the Migration Agents’ Code of Conduct prescribed under s 314(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (“the Act”); and

(ii) In all the circumstances, it is not appropriate to cancel or suspend his registration or to caution him under s 303 of the Act.

[sgd] Joan Dwyer

Senior Member

MIGRATION AGENTS’ REGISTRATION – suspension of applicant’s registration as migration agent – complaint from DIMIA –  whether applicant breached the Code of Conduct for migration agents prescribed under Migration Agents’ Regulations 1998 – finding that clauses of Code of Conduct breached – breaches relating to office procedures rather than professional standards – purpose of scheme is to protect the public not to punish – applicant completed courses in office procedures and e-mail – appropriate to take into account matters after decision under review – no longer reason for caution – evidence that caution may affect ability to obtain professional indemnity insurance required from July 2005 –appropriate that no sanction be imposed – decision under review set aside.

LAW REFORM – suggested amendment to the Migration Agents’ Code of Conduct.

Migration Act 1958 ss 286, 303, 304, 304A, 306, 314(1), 417.

Migration Legislation Amendment (Migration Agents’ Integrity Measures) 2004

Re Altintas and Migration Agent’s Registration Authority [2004] AATA 978
Re Donald and Australian Securities and Investment Commission (2001) 64 ALD 717
Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 24 ALR 577
Freeman v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1988) 19 FCR 342
Re Griffiths and Migration Agents’ Registration Authority [2001] AATA 240

Re Hudson and Migration Agents’ Review Authority [2004] AATA 1007

REASONS FOR DECISION

27 April 2005 Senior Member Joan Dwyer         

INTRODUCTION

1. This is an application under s 306 of the Migration Act 1958 (“the Act”) for review of a decision of the Migration Agents Registration Authority (“MARA”) made on 19 April 2004, which suspended Mr Vasilopoulos’ registration as a Migration Agent for a period of twelve months, or until the following conditions were satisfied (T2, p7):

·a minimum period of six months has passed;

·[Mr Vasilopoulos] complete and pass the Migration Advice Professional Knowledge Entrance Examination; and

·[Mr Vasilopoulos] undertake a CDP activity which is a file management course and provides evidence to the Authority that the Agent has completed that course; and

·[Mr Vasilopoulos] provide a statutory declaration in Commonwealth form stating that he has not made immigration representations for a fee nor given immigration assistance as defined in the Act while suspended.

The basis for that decision was MARA’s finding that Mr Vasilopoulos had not complied with the…

Continue reading Vasilopoulos and Migration Agents' Registration Authority

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Vasilopoulos and Migration Agents' Registration Authority [2005] AATA 368
Case
[2005] AATA 368
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Vasilopoulos was a registered migration agent who faced proceedings for alleged breaches of the Migration Agents’ Code of Conduct. The Migration Agents' Registration Authority brought the case before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, seeking to suspend or cancel his registration. The Tribunal was tasked with determining whether Vasilopoulos had contravened specific clauses of the Code of Conduct and whether any action should be taken against his registration.

The legal issues revolved around whether Vasilopoulos had indeed breached clauses 2.8(a), (c) and (d), 5.2, 6.1(c) and 11.3 of the Code of Conduct, and if so, what the appropriate disciplinary action should be. The Tribunal had to interpret the relevant provisions of the Code and assess the evidence presented to decide on the breaches and the consequences.

The Tribunal found that Vasilopoulos had contravened several clauses of the Code of Conduct. However, it concluded that while his conduct was unsatisfactory, the breaches did not warrant a cancellation or suspension of his registration. The Tribunal considered the totality of circumstances, including the nature of the breaches, the absence of a significant impact on clients, and the likelihood of future compliance. Consequently, the Tribunal decided not to impose any disciplinary action, deeming it inappropriate in the circumstances.

The Tribunal set aside the Authority's decision to cancel or suspend Vasilopoulos' registration. Instead, it determined that while there were breaches of the Code of Conduct, no disciplinary action was warranted. The Tribunal's decision was based on the specific facts of the case, the nature of the breaches, and the overall context in which they occurred.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review. In substitution, the Tribunal decides:

(i) Mr Vasilopoulos has not complied with clauses 2.8(a), (c) and (d), 5.2, 6.1(c) and 11.3 of the Migration Agents’ Code of Conduct prescribed under s 314(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (“the Act”); and

(ii) In all the circumstances, it is not appropriate to cancel or suspend his registration or to caution him under s 303 of the Act.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.