Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2005] AATA 368
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No V2004/507
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION ) Re ARTHUR VASILOPOULOS Applicant
And
MIGRATION AGENTS' REGISTRATION AUTHORITY
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Senior Member Joan Dwyer Date27 April 2005
PlaceMelbourne
Decision The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review. In substitution, the Tribunal decides:
(i) Mr Vasilopoulos has not complied with clauses 2.8(a), (c) and (d), 5.2, 6.1(c) and 11.3 of the Migration Agents’ Code of Conduct prescribed under s 314(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (“the Act”); and
(ii) In all the circumstances, it is not appropriate to cancel or suspend his registration or to caution him under s 303 of the Act.
[sgd] Joan Dwyer
Senior Member
MIGRATION AGENTS’ REGISTRATION – suspension of applicant’s registration as migration agent – complaint from DIMIA – whether applicant breached the Code of Conduct for migration agents prescribed under Migration Agents’ Regulations 1998 – finding that clauses of Code of Conduct breached – breaches relating to office procedures rather than professional standards – purpose of scheme is to protect the public not to punish – applicant completed courses in office procedures and e-mail – appropriate to take into account matters after decision under review – no longer reason for caution – evidence that caution may affect ability to obtain professional indemnity insurance required from July 2005 –appropriate that no sanction be imposed – decision under review set aside.
LAW REFORM – suggested amendment to the Migration Agents’ Code of Conduct.
Migration Act 1958 ss 286, 303, 304, 304A, 306, 314(1), 417.
Migration Legislation Amendment (Migration Agents’ Integrity Measures) 2004
Re Altintas and Migration Agent’s Registration Authority [2004] AATA 978
Re Donald and Australian Securities and Investment Commission (2001) 64 ALD 717
Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 24 ALR 577
Freeman v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1988) 19 FCR 342
Re Griffiths and Migration Agents’ Registration Authority [2001] AATA 240Re Hudson and Migration Agents’ Review Authority [2004] AATA 1007
REASONS FOR DECISION
27 April 2005 Senior Member Joan Dwyer INTRODUCTION
1. This is an application under s 306 of the Migration Act 1958 (“the Act”) for review of a decision of the Migration Agents Registration Authority (“MARA”) made on 19 April 2004, which suspended Mr Vasilopoulos’ registration as a Migration Agent for a period of twelve months, or until the following conditions were satisfied (T2, p7):
·a minimum period of six months has passed;
·[Mr Vasilopoulos] complete and pass the Migration Advice Professional Knowledge Entrance Examination; and
·[Mr Vasilopoulos] undertake a CDP activity which is a file management course and provides evidence to the Authority that the Agent has completed that course; and
·[Mr Vasilopoulos] provide a statutory declaration in Commonwealth form stating that he has not made immigration representations for a fee nor given immigration assistance as defined in the Act while suspended.
The basis for that decision was MARA’s finding that Mr Vasilopoulos had not complied with the…
Continue reading Vasilopoulos and Migration Agents' Registration Authority
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Vasilopoulos and Migration Agents' Registration Authority [2005] AATA 368
- Case
- [2005] AATA 368
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues revolved around whether Vasilopoulos had indeed breached clauses 2.8(a), (c) and (d), 5.2, 6.1(c) and 11.3 of the Code of Conduct, and if so, what the appropriate disciplinary action should be. The Tribunal had to interpret the relevant provisions of the Code and assess the evidence presented to decide on the breaches and the consequences.
The Tribunal found that Vasilopoulos had contravened several clauses of the Code of Conduct. However, it concluded that while his conduct was unsatisfactory, the breaches did not warrant a cancellation or suspension of his registration. The Tribunal considered the totality of circumstances, including the nature of the breaches, the absence of a significant impact on clients, and the likelihood of future compliance. Consequently, the Tribunal decided not to impose any disciplinary action, deeming it inappropriate in the circumstances.
The Tribunal set aside the Authority's decision to cancel or suspend Vasilopoulos' registration. Instead, it determined that while there were breaches of the Code of Conduct, no disciplinary action was warranted. The Tribunal's decision was based on the specific facts of the case, the nature of the breaches, and the overall context in which they occurred.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review. In substitution, the Tribunal decides:
(i) Mr Vasilopoulos has not complied with clauses 2.8(a), (c) and (d), 5.2, 6.1(c) and 11.3 of the Migration Agents’ Code of Conduct prescribed under s 314(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (“the Act”); and
(ii) In all the circumstances, it is not appropriate to cancel or suspend his registration or to caution him under s 303 of the Act.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.