Upper Lachlan Shire Council v Rodgers

Link copied
Case Copied 29 min read

Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Upper Lachlan Shire Council v Rodgers [2012] NSWCA 259
Hearing dates:13 August 2012
Decision date: 23 August 2012
Before: Allsop P at [1]
Campbell JA at [52]
Barrett JA at [53]
Decision:

Appeal dismissed with costs.

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

Catchwords:

NEGLIGENCE - duty of care - breach - inadequate lighting in car park - car park user tripped on log in darkness en route to vehicle - reasonable requirement for car park operator to take precautions - no contributory negligence

NEGLIGENCE - damages - past domestic assistance - sufficient evidence to justify conclusion of 1-2 hours per day of gratuitous care
Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Carey v Lake Macquarie City Council [2007] NSWCA 4
Consolidated Broken Hill Ltd v Edwards [2005] NSWCA 380
Harrison v Melhem [2008] NSWCA 67; 72 NSWLR 380
Hill v Forrester [2010] NSWCA 170
Pacific Steel Constructions Pty Ltd v Barahona [2009] NSWCA 406
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Upper Lachlan Shire Council (Appellant)
Terry Rodgers (Respondent)
Representation: R Sheldon SC/G Donnellan (Appellant)
D Campbell SC/A Foel (Respondent)
DLA Piper (Appellant)
Galland Elder Lulham (Respondent)
File Number(s):2009/338667
 Decision under appeal 
Date of Decision:
2011-09-28 00:00:00
Before:
Murrell SC DCJ
File Number(s):
2009/338667

Judgment

  1. ALLSOP P: On the evening of 11 October 2008, the plaintiff (respondent to the appeal), Mr Terry Rodgers, then 65 years of age, fell in the darkened car park adjacent to the corner of Spring and Goulburn Streets in Crookwell. Mr Rodgers and his wife had just had dinner across the road at the "Top Pub Hotel". Mr Rodgers was not affected by alcohol. The car park was owned and operated by the defendant (appellant in the appeal), the Upper Lachlan Shire Council.

  1. Mr Rodgers had parked his car in a north/south direction in the north east corner of the car park during the hours of dusk. Visible at that time, and to Mr Rodgers, was a wooden pole or log lying horizontally in an east/west direction some feet from a brick wall in the same direction. The pole acted as a barrier to further movement by cars in the direction of the wall. The log was at about shin height, somewhat below the knee height of an average adult. Also adjacent to the north east corner of the carpark was a bus shelter. From where Mr Rodgers parked his car there were two ways of reaching the footpath near the corner of Spring and Goulburn Streets, from which one would cross Spring Street to the…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Upper Lachlan Shire Council v Rodgers and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2012] NSWCA 259
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The New South Wales Court of Appeal considered an appeal by Upper Lachlan Shire Council against a judgment awarded to Mr Rodgers. Mr Rodgers had tripped and sustained injuries in a car park owned and operated by the Council. The incident occurred when Mr Rodgers was walking to his vehicle in the dark and encountered a log, which was not visible due to inadequate lighting. Mr Rodgers alleged that the Council had been negligent in its maintenance and lighting of the car park.

The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the Council owed a duty of care to users of its car park, whether that duty had been breached by failing to provide adequate lighting and remove the obstruction, and whether Mr Rodgers had been contributorily negligent. The Court was also required to consider the sufficiency of the evidence presented regarding the claim for past domestic assistance.

The Court of Appeal affirmed the primary judge's findings. It held that the Council, as the operator of the car park, owed a duty of care to its users to take reasonable precautions against foreseeable risks of injury. The Court found that the inadequate lighting in the car park, which rendered a log an unseen hazard, constituted a breach of that duty. The Court also determined that there was no evidence to support a finding of contributory negligence on the part of Mr Rodgers. Furthermore, the Court was satisfied that the evidence presented was sufficient to justify the award for past gratuitous domestic assistance, concluding that Mr Rodgers had required and received approximately one to two hours of such care per day.

The appeal was dismissed, and Upper Lachlan Shire Council was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal dismissed with costs.

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.