NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ullah vs Roads and Maritime Services [2014] NSWCATAD 71 Hearing dates: 22nd April 2014 and 7 May 2014 Decision date: 28 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Scahill, Senior Member Decision: The decision to cancel the Applicant's authority to drive a taxi-cab is affirmed.
Catchwords: fit and proper person" false statutory declarations" Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
Evidence Act 1995 NSW
HYPERLINK " Oaths Act 1900
HYPERLINK " Passenger Transport Act 1990
HYPERLINK " Passenger Transport Regulation 2007Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond HYPERLINK " \o "View Case" [1990] HCA 33; HYPERLINK " \o "View LawCiteRecord" (1990) 170 CLR 321 D
Parvez v. Roads and Maritime Services [2014] NSWCATOD 13
Pillai v Messiter [No.2] (1989) 16 NSWLR 197
R v Einfeld HYPERLINK " \o "View Case" [2009] NSWSC 119
Saadieh v Director-General, Department of Transport HYPERLINK " \o "View Case" [1999] NSWADT 68
Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board [1979] 22 SASR 70rake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs HYPERLINK " \o "View LawCiteRecord" (1979) 46 FLR 409
Hughes & Vale Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127
Lal v Director-General, Department of Transport HYPERLINK " \o "View Case" [2001] NSWADT 74
Loye -v- Director General, Department of Transport [2000] NSWADT 145
Miah v Roads and Maritime Services HYPERLINK " \o "View Case" [2013] NSWADT 264
Naveed v Roads and Maritime Services [2014] NSWCATOD 4Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mujib Ullah (Applicant in person)
Roads and Maritime Services (Respondent)Representation: M Ullah (Applicant in person)
Smythe Wozniak (Respondent)
File Number(s): 1420097
reasons for decision
Background
The Applicant Mr Ullah is seeking review of a decision by the Respondent on 24th December 2013 to cancel his taxi-cab driver authority.
Mr Ullah was born in Bangladesh. He came to Australia and undertook a PhD in Agricultural Research Economics at University of New England. He first obtained a New South Wales taxicab driver authority number GO 2599 in 2002.
Show cause letter
By letter dated 17th October 2013 the Respondent Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) wrote to Mr Ullah asking him to show cause as to why his driver authority should not be cancelled. The reasons provided were that Mr Ullah had been convicted of swearing 4 false statutory declarations attributing responsibility for 4 driving offences he had committed while driving a cab to other people.
Accordingly the RMS considered that the reliance on the 4 false statutory declarations, Mr Ullah's convictions before the Local Court for swearing these false declarations and the 4 traffic offences raised grave doubts about Mr Ullah's aptitude to drive the vehicle, his responsibility and his fitness and propriety. These are qualities in an Applicant to which the Respondent must attest prior to granting a taxi-cab authority. The Respondent also has the power to cancel a taxi driver's authority should…
Continue reading Ullah vs Roads and Maritime Services
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Ullah vs Roads and Maritime Services [2014] NSWCATAD 71
- Case
- [2014] NSWCATAD 71
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to examine whether the decision to cancel the Applicant's taxi-driving authority was lawful, reasonable, and justified. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the Applicant was a "fit and proper person" to hold a taxi-driving authority, and whether the decision to revoke his authority was based on reliable evidence, such as the alleged false statutory declarations. The court also had to consider the proportionality of the penalty imposed, and whether the Applicant had an opportunity to be heard before the decision was made.
The court found that the decision to cancel the Applicant's authority was justified and proportionate, given the seriousness of the allegations against him. The court held that the evidence of the false statutory declarations was reliable and sufficient to support the decision to revoke the Applicant's authority. The court also found that the Applicant had been given an adequate opportunity to respond to the allegations, and that the penalty imposed was not excessive. The Applicant's argument that the decision was flawed due to procedural irregularities was rejected by the court, which held that any errors did not affect the outcome of the case.
The decision to cancel the Applicant's authority to drive a taxi-cab is affirmed. The Applicant's appeal is dismissed, and the costs of the proceeding are awarded to the respondent.
Orders
Orders of the court
The decision to cancel the Applicant's authority to drive a taxi-cab is affirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.