FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| TULLY v CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR & ANOR | [2017] FCCA 218 |
| Catchwords: CHILD SUPPORT – Appeal of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – three grounds of appeal – applicant unsuccessful on all grounds – appeal dismissed. |
| Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, ss.2A, 44AAA Family Law Act 1975, s.76(1) |
| Cases cited: Child Support Registrar & Crabbe and Anor [2014] FamCAFC 10 Haritos v Commission of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 92 Kostas v HIA Insurance [2010] HCA 32 Minister of Immigration v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Penman & Child Support Registrar and Anor [2015] FamCAFC 492 |
| Applicant: | MR TULLY |
| First Respondent: | CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
| Second Respondent: | ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | BRG 522 of 2016 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Cassidy |
| Hearing date: | 18 November 2016 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 18 November 2016 |
| Delivered at: | Brisbane |
| Delivered on: | 16 February 2017 |
REPRESENTATION
| The Applicant appeared in person |
| Special Counsel for the First Respondent: | Ms Rayment |
| Solicitors for the First Respondent: | Mills Oakley Lawyers |
| Counsel for the Second Respondent: | Dr Sayers |
| Solicitors for the Second Respondent: | Rice Naughton |
ORDERS
That the amended notice of appeal filed on 21 August 2016 be dismissed.
That the applicant pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the sum of $6,948.00 within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this Order.
That the second respondent file and serve written submission and any affidavit material in relation to the indemnity costs application by no later than 4.00pm on 16 March 2017.
That the applicant file and serve written submissions in reply and any affidavit material in relation to the indemnity costs application by no later than 4.00pm on 13 April 2017.
That this matter be adjourned for judgment at 9.30am on 4 May 2017 in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia at Brisbane.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Tully v Child Support Registrar & Anor is approved pursuant to s.110X(4)(h) of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE |
BRG 522 of 2016
| MR TULLY |
Applicant
And
| CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
First Respondent
| ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
This is an appeal by Mr Tully from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (‘the AAT’) in relation to an assessment of child support. That decision was made by Ms K Buxton on 4 May 2016. Ms Buxton’s decision was:
“The tribunal sets aside the decision under review and, in substitution, decides that for the period 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017 the annual rate of child support is increased by $15,600 per annum (for private school fees).”
The Child Support Registrar (‘the Registrar’) and the mother, Ms…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Tully v Child Support Registrar and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] FCCA 218
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the Registrar's decision was correct and whether the amended notice of appeal filed by the applicant should be upheld. A secondary issue arose concerning indemnity costs.
Judge Cassidy dismissed the applicant's amended notice of appeal. The court's reasoning and the specific legal principles applied in reaching this decision are not detailed in the provided text. However, the orders indicate that the applicant was ordered to pay the first respondent's costs, with further directions given for submissions regarding an indemnity costs application. The matter was ultimately adjourned for judgment on the indemnity costs application.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the amended notice of appeal filed on 21 August 2016 be dismissed.
2.
That the applicant pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the sum of $6,948.00 within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this Order.
3.
That the second respondent file and serve written submission and any affidavit material in relation to the indemnity costs application by no later than 4.00pm on 16 March 2017.
4.
That the applicant file and serve written submissions in reply and any affidavit material in relation to the indemnity costs application by no later than 4.00pm on 13 April 2017.
5.
That this matter be adjourned for judgment at 9.30am on 4 May 2017 in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia at Brisbane.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.