Tulloch v Sambo

Case [2010] QDC 531


DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Tulloch v Sambo  [2010] QDC 531

PARTIES:

DAPHNE ADELE TULLOCH
(Applicant)

AND

LEROY TREVOR SAMBO
(Respondent)

FILE NO:

10/2009

DIVISION:

Civil

PROCEEDING:

Application for criminal compensation

ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court, Mt Isa

DELIVERED ON:

17 December 2010

DELIVERED AT:

Beenleigh

HEARING DATE:

17 December 2010

JUDGE:

Dearden DCJ

ORDER:

The respondent Leroy Trevor Sambo pay the applicant Daphne Adele Tulloch the sum of $24,000.

CATCHWORDS:

LEGISLATION:

CASES:

APPLICATION – Criminal Compensation – enter premises and commit assault occasioning bodily harm while armed – bruising/laceration – fractured finger– mental/nervous shock

Criminal Offence Victims Act1995 (Qld) s. 25(7).

Victims of Crime Assistance Act2009 (Qld) s. 167(2).

Paterson v Chand & Chand [2008] QDC 214.

COUNSEL:

Ms J. Johnsen (Solicitor) for the applicant

No appearance for the respondent

SOLICITORS:

Rod Madsen Solicitors for the applicant

No appearance for the respondent

INTRODUCTION
[1] HIS HONOUR:  The respondent, Leroy Trevor Sambo, pleaded guilty before me at the Mt Isa District Court on 19 November 2007 to an indictment which alleged that he entered premises and committed assault occasioning bodily harm while armed on the applicant, Ms Daphne Adele Tulloch. 

[2] On 20 November 2007 the respondent was sentenced to twelve months imprisonment with parole ordered after serving three months (exhibit DAT-6 affidavit of Daphne Tulloch sworn 3 March 2009).  The circumstances of the offending were outlined by the Prosecutor on sentence at pp 1-2 - 1-3 (Exhibit JCJ-5 affidavit of Jenna Johnsen sworn 5 August 2010). 

FACTS 
[3] "On the 8th of May 2007, the applicant, Daphne Adele Tulloch, a 69 year old woman, was the manager of Tulloch Music World, located at 11 Simpson Street in Mt Isa.  The applicant was working in her store when the respondent entered the premises with a plank of wood.  He entered - he was the only person other than the applicant in the store at the time - and approached the applicant, who was sitting at her desk.  Without speaking to the applicant in any way, he struck her across the back of the head with the plank of wood.  That caused part of the plank to break off.  He then sought to strike her again.  The applicant brought up her left arm to protect herself and she was hit twice in that arm.  The applicant screamed and, in what is a real act of bravery, attempted to fight back.  The respondent ran from the store up Simpson Street.  He was chased by numerous members of the public and he was located by police when members of the public waved them down".

INJURIES
[4] As the applicant's Victim Impact Statement indicates, the broken bone in her left hand required specialist treatment at Townsville Hospital, including the insertion of a wire in the applicant's finger to hold the bone together, lengthy periods with casts and an operation to remove the wire (exhibit DAT-2, affidavit of Daphne Tulloch sworn 3 March 2009).

THE LAW
[5] The application in these proceedings was…

Continue reading Tulloch v Sambo

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Tulloch v Sambo [2010] QDC 531
Case
[2010] QDC 531
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Tulloch v Sambo was heard by the Court where the applicant, Daphne Adele Tulloch, sought criminal injury compensation for an incident where she was assaulted by the respondent, Leroy Trevor Sambo. The assault occurred when Sambo entered Tulloch's premises and attacked her, causing physical injuries that included bruising, lacerations, a fractured finger, as well as mental and nervous shock. Tulloch filed an application under the relevant statutory provisions to claim compensation for the harm suffered.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether Sambo's actions constituted a criminal injury as defined by the applicable legislation and, if so, what amount of compensation Tulloch was entitled to receive. The Court needed to consider the extent of the physical injuries, the impact on Tulloch's mental health, and the proportionality of the compensation awarded. Additionally, the Court had to determine if any mitigating factors should reduce the amount of compensation.

The Court found that the injuries sustained by Tulloch met the criteria for a criminal injury under the statute. The physical harm, including the fractured finger and the extent of bruising and lacerations, were significant. Moreover, the mental and nervous shock experienced by Tulloch was severe enough to warrant compensation. After considering the totality of the circumstances, the Court awarded Tulloch $24,000 in compensation. The Court deemed this amount appropriate given the nature and impact of the injuries suffered.

The final orders of the Court required Sambo to pay Tulloch the sum of $24,000 as criminal injury compensation. This decision reflects the Court's assessment of the severity of the injuries and the impact on Tulloch's well-being.

Orders

Orders of the court

The respondent Leroy Trevor Sambo pay the applicant Daphne Adele Tulloch the sum of $24,000.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.