Tu v Chang

Case [2016] FCA 1567


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Tu v Chang [2016] FCA 1567

File number: NSD 927 of 2016
Judge: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 20 October 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application under r 9.63 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) that the NSW Trustee and Guardian be appointed as the applicant’s litigation representative – consent and certificate filed in compliance with r 9.64 – NSW Trustee and Guardian appointed as applicant’s litigation representative
Legislation:

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 9.61, 9.62, 9.63, 9.64

NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW), ss 3(1), 5, 11(1)(a), 11(1)(b)

Date of hearing: 20 October 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Klooster
Solicitor for the Applicant: Shaw McDonald Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr G McDonald
Solicitor for the Respondent: CCSG Legal Pty Ltd

ORDERS

NSD 927 of 2016
BETWEEN:

DAT QUYEN TU BY HIS LITIGATION REPRESENTATIVE THE NSW TRUSTEE & GUARDIAN

Applicant

AND:

LAI WAH CHANG

Respondent

JUDGE:

BROMWICH J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 OCTOBER 2016

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The NSW Trustee and Guardian be appointed as the applicant’s litigation representative pursuant to rule 9.63 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) with effect from the date of the filing of the application on 10 June 2016.

Note:    Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Revised from transcript)

BROMWICH J:

  1. The following short reasons were delivered ex tempore at the commencement of the hearing of this matter in response to an application that the NSW Trustee and Guardian be appointed as the applicant’s litigation representative pursuant to r 9.63 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). These reasons do not go to the applicant’s substantive application to set aside a bankruptcy notice pursuant to s 41 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).

  2. Rule 9.61 of the Federal Court Rules provides that:

    A person under a legal incapacity may start, or defend, a proceeding only by the person’s litigation representative.  [note omitted]

  3. The Dictionary to the Federal Court Rules defines “litigation representative” as meaning a person who has been appointed for a proceeding as a litigation representative for a person under a legal incapacity, and a “person under a legal incapacity” as meaning a minor or a mentally disabled person. 

  4. Rule 9.62 provides who may be a litigation representative. Rule 9.63 provides for the appointment of a litigation representative by the Court. Rule 9.64 provides that a litigation representative must not take a step in the proceedings unless there has been filed that litigation representative’s consent together with a certificate that the litigation representative has no interest in the proceedings that is adverse to the interest of the person under a legal incapacity, signed by the litigation representative if that person is a lawyer, or, if that person is not a…

Continue reading Tu v Chang

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Tu v Chang [2016] FCA 1567
Case
[2016] FCA 1567
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Tu v Chang, the applicant, Tu, sought an order appointing the NSW Trustee and Guardian as Tu's litigation representative in a proceeding. The application was made under rule 9.63 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). The legal issues for the Court to decide were whether the application was properly filed and whether the consent and certificate filed by Tu and the NSW Trustee and Guardian were in compliance with rule 9.64 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). The Court had to determine if Tu was a person with impaired decision-making capacity and if the appointment of the NSW Trustee and Guardian was in Tu's best interests. The Court found that the application was properly filed and that the consent and certificate were in compliance with rule 9.64. The Court concluded that Tu was a person with impaired decision-making capacity and that the appointment of the NSW Trustee and Guardian was in Tu's best interests. The NSW Trustee and Guardian was therefore appointed as Tu's litigation representative.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The NSW Trustee and Guardian be appointed as the applicant’s litigation representative pursuant to rule 9.63 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) with effect from the date of the filing of the application on 10 June 2016.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.