FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tu v Chang [2016] FCA 1567
File number: NSD 927 of 2016 Judge: BROMWICH J Date of judgment: 20 October 2016 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application under r 9.63 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) that the NSW Trustee and Guardian be appointed as the applicant’s litigation representative – consent and certificate filed in compliance with r 9.64 – NSW Trustee and Guardian appointed as applicant’s litigation representative Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 9.61, 9.62, 9.63, 9.64
NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW), ss 3(1), 5, 11(1)(a), 11(1)(b)
Date of hearing: 20 October 2016 Registry: New South Wales Division: General Division National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 13 Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Klooster Solicitor for the Applicant: Shaw McDonald Lawyers Counsel for the Respondent: Mr G McDonald Solicitor for the Respondent: CCSG Legal Pty Ltd ORDERS
NSD 927 of 2016 BETWEEN: DAT QUYEN TU BY HIS LITIGATION REPRESENTATIVE THE NSW TRUSTEE & GUARDIAN
Applicant
AND: LAI WAH CHANG
Respondent
JUDGE:
BROMWICH J
DATE OF ORDER:
20 OCTOBER 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The NSW Trustee and Guardian be appointed as the applicant’s litigation representative pursuant to rule 9.63 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) with effect from the date of the filing of the application on 10 June 2016.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Revised from transcript)BROMWICH J:
The following short reasons were delivered ex tempore at the commencement of the hearing of this matter in response to an application that the NSW Trustee and Guardian be appointed as the applicant’s litigation representative pursuant to r 9.63 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). These reasons do not go to the applicant’s substantive application to set aside a bankruptcy notice pursuant to s 41 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
Rule 9.61 of the Federal Court Rules provides that:
A person under a legal incapacity may start, or defend, a proceeding only by the person’s litigation representative. [note omitted]
The Dictionary to the Federal Court Rules defines “litigation representative” as meaning a person who has been appointed for a proceeding as a litigation representative for a person under a legal incapacity, and a “person under a legal incapacity” as meaning a minor or a mentally disabled person.
Rule 9.62 provides who may be a litigation representative. Rule 9.63 provides for the appointment of a litigation representative by the Court. Rule 9.64 provides that a litigation representative must not take a step in the proceedings unless there has been filed that litigation representative’s consent together with a certificate that the litigation representative has no interest in the proceedings that is adverse to the interest of the person under a legal incapacity, signed by the litigation representative if that person is a lawyer, or, if that person is not a…
Continue reading Tu v Chang
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Tu v Chang [2016] FCA 1567
- Case
- [2016] FCA 1567
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The NSW Trustee and Guardian be appointed as the applicant’s litigation representative pursuant to rule 9.63 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) with effect from the date of the filing of the application on 10 June 2016.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.