Triangle Cables (Aust) Pty Ltd v Czuchwicki

Case [2012] FCA 718


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Triangle Cables (Aust) Pty Ltd v Czuchwicki [2012] FCA 718

Citation: Triangle Cables (Aust) Pty Ltd v Czuchwicki [2012] FCA 718
Parties: TRIANGLE CABLES (AUST) PTY LTD (ACN 006 373 824) v STAN CZUCHWICKI
File number: VID 230 of 2011
Judge: GRAY J
Date of judgment: 21 June 2012
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51A
Federal Court Rules 2011 r 16.07(2)
Cases cited: Triangle Cables (Aust) Pty Ltd v Czuchwicki [2011] FCA 1537, cited
Date of hearing: 21 June 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the applicant: Mr G Moore
Solicitor for the applicant: Goldsmiths
Counsel for the respondent: The respondent did not appear

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

VID 230 of 2011

BETWEEN:

TRIANGLE CABLES (AUST) PTY LTD (ACN 006 373 824)
Applicant

AND:

STAN CZUCHWICKI
Respondent

JUDGE:

GRAY J

DATE OF ORDER:

21 JUNE 2012

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The time fixed by paragraph 4 of the order made on 13 December 2011 be extended until 20 February 2012.

2.The applicant’s damages for the purposes of paragraph 1(a) of the order made on 13 December 2011 are assessed at $217,600.

3.The respondent pay to the applicant the sum of $217,600, together with interest on that sum from the date of commencement of the proceeding to the date of this order in the sum of $23,009.39.

4.The respondent pay the applicant’s costs of the proceeding incurred since the order made on 13 December 2011.

Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

VID 230 of 2011

BETWEEN:

TRIANGLE CABLES (AUST) PTY LTD (ACN 006 373 824)
Applicant

AND:

STAN CZUCHWICKI
Respondent

JUDGE:

GRAY J

DATE:

21 JUNE 2012

PLACE:

MELBOURNE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. On 13 December 2011, I gave judgment in this proceeding, consequent upon default of the respondent in complying with orders of the Court for the management of the case and its preparation for trial.  My reasons for judgment given on that day are published as Triangle Cables (Aust) Pty Ltd v Czuchwicki [2011] FCA 1537.

  2. The relevant paragraphs of the order that I made on that day are as follows:

    1.        Judgment be entered for the applicant against the respondent:

    (a)       for damages or equitable compensation to be assessed;

    (b)       for the injunctive relief referred to in paragraph 2 of this order;  and

    (c)       for the costs of the proceeding to date.

    …

    3.        The assessment of damages or equitable compensation be by affidavit         evidence.

    4.        On or before 14 February 2012, the applicant file and serve any affidavit on          which it may seek to rely on the assessment of damages or equitable   compensation.

    5.        On or before 28 February 2012, the respondent file and serve any affidavit on        which he may seek to rely on the assessment of damages…

Continue reading Triangle Cables (Aust) Pty Ltd v Czuchwicki

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Triangle Cables (Aust) Pty Ltd v Czuchwicki [2012] FCA 718
Case
[2012] FCA 718
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Triangle Cables (Aust) Pty Ltd, a company involved in the supply of electrical cables, brought proceedings against Czuchwicki, who was a director of the company. The dispute centred around the company's application for an interlocutory injunction, which was initially granted on 13 December 2011. The court was required to decide several issues, including the extension of the time for the interlocutory injunction, the assessment of damages for the applicant's loss, and the payment of costs and interest.

The court examined the reasons for extending the interlocutory injunction and determined that there was sufficient justification for the extension to 20 February 2012. The assessment of damages for the applicant's loss was based on the loss of profit and the loss of the opportunity to recover the cost of the cables supplied. The court calculated the damages at $217,600. The court also considered the interest on the damages from the date of commencement of the proceeding to the date of the order, which amounted to $23,009.39. Finally, the court ordered the respondent to pay the applicant's costs of the proceeding incurred since the order made on 13 December 2011.

The court made several orders, including extending the time fixed by the interlocutory injunction, assessing the applicant's damages, ordering the respondent to pay the damages, and ordering the respondent to pay the applicant's costs of the proceeding incurred since the interlocutory injunction was granted. The orders were made in accordance with Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The time fixed by paragraph 4 of the order made on 13 December 2011 be extended until 20 February 2012.

2. The applicant’s damages for the purposes of paragraph 1(a) of the order made on 13 December 2011 are assessed at $217,600.

3. The respondent pay to the applicant the sum of $217,600, together with interest on that sum from the date of commencement of the proceeding to the date of this order in the sum of $23,009.39.

4. The respondent pay the applicant’s costs of the proceeding incurred since the order made on 13 December 2011.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.